Justification by an Infinity of Conditional Probabilities

Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 50 (2):183-193 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Today it is generally assumed that epistemic justification comes in degrees. The consequences, however, have not been adequately appreciated. In this paper we show that the assumption invalidates some venerable attacks on infinitism: once we accept that epistemic justification is gradual, an infinitist stance makes perfect sense. It is only without the assumption that infinitism runs into difficulties

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,150

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Justification by Infinite Loops.David Atkinson & Jeanne Peijnenburg - 2010 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 51 (4):407-416.
Foundationalism for Modest Infinitists.John Turri - 2010 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 40 (2):275-283.
Infinitism redux? A response to Klein.Carl Gillett - 2003 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66 (3):709–717.
On Degrees of Justification.Gregor Betz - 2012 - Erkenntnis 77 (2):237-272.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
152 (#124,963)

6 months
10 (#272,956)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jeanne Peijnenburg
University of Groningen

References found in this work

The structure of empirical knowledge.Laurence BonJour - 1985 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Is coherence truth conducive?T. Shogenji - 1999 - Analysis 59 (4):338-345.
Measuring confirmation.David Christensen - 1999 - Journal of Philosophy 96 (9):437-461.
Measuring coherence.Igor Douven & Wouter Meijs - 2007 - Synthese 156 (3):405 - 425.

View all 12 references / Add more references