Trans porting the Burden of Justification: The Unethicality of Transgender Conversion Practices

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 50 (3):425-442 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Transgender conversion practices involve attempts to alter, discourage, or suppress a person’s gender identity and/or desired gender presentation, including by delaying or preventing gender transition. Proponents of the practices have argued that they should be allowed until proven to be harmful. Drawing on the notion of expressive equality, I argue that conversion practices are prima facie unethical because they do not fulfill a legitimate clinical purpose and conflict with the self-understanding of trans communities.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,783

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Clarifying Key Issues around Conversion Therapy.James McTavish & Tadeusz Pacholczyk - 2021 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 21 (4):571-586.
Across and Beyond.Gunnar Lund - 2012 - Stance 5 (1):7-18.
Trans Theorizing.Andrzej Klimczuk & Małgorzata Bieńkowska - 2016 - In Nancy Naples, Renee Hoogland, Wickramasinghe C., Wong Maithree & Wai Ching Angela (eds.), The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Gender and Sexuality Studies, 5 Volume Set. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 1--3.
Affectional Conversion.Bernard J. Tyrrell - 1996 - Method 14 (1):1-35.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-01-06

Downloads
4 (#1,621,857)

6 months
2 (#1,192,898)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references