Husserl and Putnam on the Human Sciences versus the Natural Sciences

Southern Journal of Philosophy 32 (4):355-366 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,610

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Husserl, Weber, Freud, and the method of the human sciences.Donald McIntosh - 1997 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 27 (3):328-353.
Truth, method, and objectivity Husserl and Gadamer on scientific method.A. T. Nuyen - 1990 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 20 (4):437-452.
Two cultures revisited: New widening gaps.Ladislav Kovác - 2002 - World Futures 58 (1):1 – 11.
Toward a Theory of Human History.Joseph Margolis - 2010 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 4 (3-4):245-273.
Why did Husserl not become the Galileo of the science of consciousness?Andrzej Klawiter - 2004 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 82 (1):253-271.
What is Wrong with Husserl's Scientific Anti-Realism?Harald A. Wiltsche - 2012 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 55 (2):105-130.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-15

Downloads
76 (#217,013)

6 months
9 (#300,492)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Kristana Arp
Long Island University, C.W. Post

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references