Reply to Efird and Stoneham

Australasian Journal of Philosophy 84 (2):281 – 283 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This Article does not have an abstract

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/00048400600759142

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,611

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Truthmakers and possible worlds.David Efird & Tom Stoneham - 2005 - Analysis 65 (4):290–294.
Combinatorialism and the possibility of nothing.David Efird & Tom Stoneham - 2006 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 84 (2):269 – 280.
Justifying metaphysical nihilism: A response to Cameron.David Efird & Tom Stoneham - 2009 - Philosophical Quarterly 59 (234):132-137.
Berkeley's world: an examination of the Three dialogues.Tom Stoneham - 2002 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Is metaphysical nihilism interesting?David Efird & Tom Stoneham - 2009 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 90 (2):210-231.
A case of confusing probability and confirmation.Jeanne Peijnenburg - 2012 - Synthese 184 (1):101-107.
Lewis's Principle of Recombination: Reply to Efird and Stoneham.George Darby & Duncan Watson - 2010 - Dialectica 64 (3):435-445.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
39 (#412,276)

6 months
1 (#1,478,830)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Mereology, modality and magic.Katherine Hawley - 2010 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (1):117 – 133.
The Possibility Principle and the Truthmakers for Modal Truths.Timothy Pawl - 2010 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (3):417-428.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Truth and truthmakers.D. M. Armstrong - 2004 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
A Combinatorial Theory of Possibility.David Malet Armstrong - 1989 - Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
A Combinatorial Theory of Possibility.Graeme Forbes - 1991 - Philosophical Quarterly 41 (164):350-352.

Add more references