A set of axioms for the propositional calculus with implication and converse non-implication

Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 6 (2):123-128 (1965)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,100

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Propositional calculus in implication and non-equivalence.A. N. Prior - 1969 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 10 (3):271-272.
From if to bi.Samson Abramsky & Jouko Väänänen - 2009 - Synthese 167 (2):207 - 230.
Defining relevant implication in a propositionally quantified S.Philip Kremer - 1997 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 62 (4):1057-1069.
Implication with possible exceptions.Herman Jurjus & Harrie de Swart - 2001 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (2):517-535.
Eliminating “converse” from converse PDL.Giuseppe Giacomo - 1996 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 5 (2):193-208.
On the role of implication in formal logic.Jonathan P. Seldin - 2000 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 65 (3):1076-1114.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
33 (#485,976)

6 months
19 (#136,521)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Handbook of Logical Thought in India.Sundar Sarukkai & Mihir Chakraborty (eds.) - 2018 - New Delhi, India: Springer.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references