The Aftermath of Baby M: Proposed State Laws on Surrogate Motherhood

Hastings Center Report 17 (5):31-40 (1987)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

New Jersey's Baby M case has thrust the issue of surrogate motherhood on state legislatures throughout the country. Like artificial insemination in the 1950s and 1960s, this new reproductive technology is evoking legislative responses ranging from horrified prohibition to cautious facilitation.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

2012

DOI

10.2307/3562669

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,998

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Control and compensation: Laws governing extracorporeal generative materials.Lori B. Andrews - 1989 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 14 (5):541-560.
Babies, Child Bearers and Commodification: Anderson, Brazier et al., and the Political Economy of Commercial Surrogate Motherhood. [REVIEW]Hugh V. McLachlan & J. K. Swales - 2000 - Health Care Analysis 8 (1):1-18.
Surrogate Motherhood: The Challenge for Feminists.Lori B. Andrews - 1988 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 16 (1-2):72-80.
Defending commercial surrogate motherhood against Van Niekerk and Van Zyl.H. V. McLachlan - 1997 - Journal of Medical Ethics 23 (6):344-348.
Exploitation and commercial surrogate motherhood.Hugh V. McLachlan & J. K. Swales - 2001 - Human Reproduction and Genetic Ethics 7 (1):8--14.
Gender, Infertility, Motherhood, and Assisted Reproductive Technology in Turkey.Serap Sahinoglu & Nuket Buken - 2010 - Human Reproduction and Genetic Ethics 16 (2):218-232.
The Contract Motherhood Debate. [REVIEW]Joan C. Callahan - 1993 - Journal of Clinical Ethics 4 (1):82-91.
Why Commercial Surrogate Motherhood Unethically Commodifies Women and Children: Reply to McLachlan and Swales. [REVIEW]Elizabeth S. Anderson - 2000 - Health Care Analysis 8 (1):19-26.
Intentional Parenthood: Responsibilities in Surrogate Motherhood.Liezl van Zyl - 2002 - Health Care Analysis 10 (2):165-175.
Iran's experience with surrogate motherhood: an Islamic view and ethical concerns.K. Aramesh - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (5):320-322.
Surrogacy in Australia: New Legal Developments.Renate Klein - 2011 - Bioethics Research Notes 23 (2):23.
Beyond altruistic and commercial contract motherhood: The professional model.Liezl van Zyl & Ruth Walker - 2012 - Bioethics 27 (7):373-381.
Enhancing autonomy in paid surrogacy.Jennifer Damelio & Kelly Sorensen - 2008 - Bioethics 22 (5):269–277.
Commercial Agencies and Surrogate Motherhood: A Transaction Cost Approach.Mhairi Galbraith, Hugh V. McLachlan & J. Kim Swales - 2005 - Health Care Analysis 13 (1):11-31.
Surrogate Motherhood, Rights and Duties: A Reply to Campbell. [REVIEW]Hugh V. McLachlan & J. K. Swales - 2001 - Health Care Analysis 9 (1):101-107.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
13 (#1,037,628)

6 months
5 (#641,095)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Surrogate Motherhood: The Challenge for Feminists.Lori B. Andrews - 1988 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 16 (1-2):72-80.
Surrogate Motherhood: The Challenge for Feminists.Lori B. Andrews - 1988 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 16 (1-2):72-80.
Is There Anything Wrong with Surrogate Motherhood? An Ethical Analysis.Ruth Macklin - 1988 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 16 (1-2):57-64.
Is Commercial Surrogacy Baby‐selling?R. Jo Kornegay - 2008 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 7 (1):45-50.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references