Filling-in models of completion: Rejoinder to Kellman, Garrigan, Shipley, and Keane (2007) and Albert (2007)

Psychological Review 114 (2):509-525 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1037/0033-295x.114.2.509

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,907

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Postscript: Identity and constraints in models of object formation.Philip J. Kellman, Patrick Garrigan, Thomas F. Shipley & Brian P. Keane - 2007 - Psychological Review 114 (2):502-508.
Interpolation processes in object perception: Reply to Anderson (2007).Philip J. Kellman, Patrick Garrigan, Thomas F. Shipley & Brian P. Keane - 2007 - Psychological Review 114 (2):488-502.
The demise of the identity hypothesis and the insufficiency and nonnecessity of contour relatability in predicting object interpolation: Comment on Kellman, Garrigan, and Shipley (2005).Barton L. Anderson - 2007 - Psychological Review 114 (2):470-487.
Object Interpolation in Three Dimensions.Philip J. Kellman, Patrick Garrigan & Thomas F. Shipley - 2005 - Psychological Review 112 (3):586-609.
Postscript: Filling-in models of completion.Barton L. Anderson - 2007 - Psychological Review 114 (2):525-527.
Visual interpolation in the 3rd and 4th dimensions.Tf Shipley & Pj Kellman - 1989 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 27 (6):487-487.
Discontinuity theory and the perception of illusory figures.T. F. Shipley & P. J. Kellman - 1988 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 26 (6):516-516.
Representations, computation, and inverse ecological optics.Heiko Neumann - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (6):766-767.
Interpolation processes in visual object perception-evidence for a discontinuity theory.P. J. Kellman & T. F. Shipley - 1987 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 25 (5):334-334.
Area, surface, and contour: Psychophysical correlates of three classes of pictorial completion.Birgitta Dresp - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (6):755-756.
Filling-in as a within-level propagation may be an illusion.Talis Bachmann - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (6):749-750.
Is interpolation cognitively encapsulated? Measuring the effects of belief on Kanizsa shape discrimination and illusory contour formation.Brian P. Keane, Hongjing Lu, Thomas V. Papathomas, Steven M. Silverstein & Philip J. Kellman - 2012 - Cognition 123 (3):404-418.
Filling-in: One or many?Luiz Pessoa, Evan Thompson & Alva Noë - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (6):1137-1139.
The functional effects of modal versus amodal filling-in.Greg Davis & Jon Driver - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (6):752-753.
Filling-in the forms.Stephen Grossberg - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (6):758-759.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
18 (#855,749)

6 months
14 (#199,860)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Mental imagery and the varieties of amodal perception.Robert Eamon Briscoe - 2011 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 92 (2):153-173.
Can Computational Goals Inform Theories of Vision?Barton L. Anderson - 2015 - Topics in Cognitive Science 7 (2):274-286.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references