Community Engagement: Critical to Continued Public Trust in Research

&
American Journal of Bioethics 13 (12):44-46 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

No abstract

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/15265161.2013.851296

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,261

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Trust and the collection, selection, analysis and interpretation of data: A scientist’s view.Stephanie J. Bird & David E. Housman - 1995 - Science and Engineering Ethics 1 (4):371-382.
Scientific Research and the Public Trust.David B. Resnik - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (3):399-409.
Hype and Public Trust in Science.Zubin Master & David B. Resnik - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (2):321-335.
Avoiding the trust deficit: Public engagement, values, the precautionary principle and the future of nanotechnology. [REVIEW]Margaret Stebbing - 2009 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6 (1):37-48.
Community Members' Engagement with and Involvement in Genomic Research: Lessons to Learn from the Field.Morenike O. Folayan, Kolawole S. Oyedeji & Olawunmi A. Fatusi - 2013 - Developing World Bioethics 15 (1):1-7.
Working with Concepts: The Role of Community in International Collaborative Biomedical Research.V. M. Marsh, D. K. Kamuya, M. J. Parker & C. S. Molyneux - 2011 - Public Health Ethics 4 (1):26-39.
Gaining Legitimacy and Losing Trust: Stakeholder Participation in Ecological Risk Assessment for Marine Protected Area Management.Raphael Treffny & Ruth Beilin - 2011 - Environmental Values 20 (3):417-438.
When Suits Meet Roots: The Antecedents and Consequences of Community Engagement Strategy. [REVIEW]Frances Bowen, Aloysius Newenham-Kahindi & Irene Herremans - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 95 (2):297 - 318.
On nanotechnology and ambivalence: The politics of enthusiasm. [REVIEW]Matthew Kearnes & Brian Wynne - 2007 - NanoEthics 1 (2):131-142.
Research, engagement and public bioethics: promoting socially robust science.M. D. Pickersgill - 2011 - Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (11):698-701.
Community engagement to facilitate, legitimize and accelerate the advancement of nanotechnologies in australia.Kristen Lyons & James Whelan - 2010 - NanoEthics 4 (1):53-66.
Trust in Nanotechnology? On Trust as Analytical Tool in Social Research on Emerging Technologies.Trond Grønli Åm - 2011 - NanoEthics 5 (1):15-28.
Alston’s Practical Rationality Argument.Michael B. Wakoff - 1999 - Journal of Philosophical Research 24:247-284.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-21

Downloads
26 (#614,101)

6 months
7 (#439,760)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Emily Anderson
Hope College

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Quality Improvement Ethics: Lessons From the SUPPORT Study.Benjamin S. Wilfond - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (12):14-19.

Add more references