Book Review : Surely You Are Joking, Monsieur Latour!Science in Action, by Bruno Latour. Milton Keynes: Open University Press: 1987, 274 pp. $25.00. Also available in paper from Harvard University Press, $12.95 [Book Review]

Science, Technology and Human Values 15 (4):495-504 (1990)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1177/016224399001500407

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,674

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society Bruno Latour Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1987, 274 p. [REVIEW]André Rocque - 1992 - Dialogue 31 (1):129-.
Metaphysical déjà vu.Martin Kusch - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 33 (3):639-647.
Metaphysical deja vu: Hacking and Latour on science studies and metaphysics - the social construction of what? Ian Hacking; Harvard university press, cambridge, mass. And London, England, 1999, pp. X+261, price £18.50 hardback, ISBN 0-674-81200-X.Pandora's hope: Essays on the reality of science studies Bruno Latour; Harvard university press, cambridge, mass. And London, England, 1999, pp. X+324, price £12.50, $19.95 paperback, ISBN 0-67-465336-X, £27.95, $45.00 hardback, ISBN 0-67-465335-. [REVIEW]M. Kusch - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 33 (3):639-647.
Review Articles : Have we never been modern? Towards a demontage of Latour's modern constitution: B. Latour, We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993.Dick Pels - 1995 - History of the Human Sciences 8 (3):129-141.
Review Articles : Have we never been modern? Towards a demontage of Latour's modern constitution: B. Latour, We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993. [REVIEW]Pels Dick - 1995 - History of the Human Sciences 8 (3):129-141.
Bruno Latour. The Pasteurization of France. London: Harvard University Press, 1988. Trans Alan Sheridan and John Law. Pp. 273. ISBN 0-674-65760-8. £23.95. [REVIEW]Keith Vernon - 1990 - British Journal for the History of Science 23 (3):344-346.
Bruno Latour: Politics of nature. How to bring the sciences into democracy. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 2004.Iñaki Martínez de Albéniz - 2006 - Foro Interno. Anuario de Teoría Política 6:203-206.
Bruno Latour. An Inquiry into Modes of Existence: An Anthropology of the Moderns. Translated by, Catherine Porter. xxvii + 486 pp. Cambridge, Mass./London: Harvard University Press, 2013. $39.95. [REVIEW]Henning Schmidgen - 2014 - Isis 105 (3):673-675.
General Science and Belief: from Copernicus to Darwin. Open University course AMST 283. 6 volumes. By C. A. Russell, D. C. Goodman, and J. H. Brooke. Milton Keynes: Open University Press, 1974. Pp. 123; 95; 110; 87; 126; 69. Total price £11.00. [REVIEW]Lorna E. Duffin - 1975 - British Journal for the History of Science 8 (3):250-251.
Book Review: Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press: Verbeek, P. (2005). What Things Do: Philosophical Reflections on Technology, Agency, and Design. Trans. R. P. Crease. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press. [REVIEW]Wyatt James Galusky - 2008 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 33 (1):142-150.
Book Review: Bruno Latour: Reassembling the Political, by Graham HarmanBruno Latour: Reassembling the Political, by HarmanGraham. Modern European Thinkers Series. London: Pluto Press, 2014. 216 pp. [REVIEW]Eve Seguin - 2017 - Political Theory 45 (5):727-731.
Science in action: how to follow scientists and engineers through society.Bruno Latour - 1987 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Ontology in Heidegger and Deleuze: a comparative analysis.Gavin Rae - 2014 - Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave MacMillan, an imprint of Macmillan Publishers.
John H. Zammito. A Nice Derangement of Epistemes: Postpositivism in the Study of Science from Quine to Latour. x + 390 pp., bibl., index. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004. [REVIEW]David Stump - 2005 - Isis 96 (1):159-160.
A Strong Distinction between Humans and Non-Humans is no Longer Required for Research Purposes: A Debate Between Bruno Latour and Steve Fuller.Colin Barron - 2003 - History of the Human Sciences 16 (2):77-99.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-11-26

Downloads
24 (#672,664)

6 months
9 (#349,017)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Anti-Latour.David Bloor - 1999 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 30 (1):81-112.
Actants and enframing: Heidegger and Latour on technology.Lynnette Khong - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 34 (4):693-704.

View all 14 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references