The constitutive rule of a round table: On Searle on Conversation

Pragmatics and Cognition 2 (1):167-190 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

'What is the dialogical way to episteme?' and 'What chances has a commentary to approach correctly this question? ' constitute the author's problems in presenting and discussing the collective volume Searle on Conversation. The contributors — along with Searle and the author of this essay — are involved in a discussion about discussion, whose constitutive norms are examined. In order to reduce the 'staging' distance between the critical act and the object of criticism, some of the analyzed concepts are transformed into analytical instruments.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Collective Acceptance and the Is-Ought Argument.Frank Hindriks - 2013 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (3):465-480.
Constitutive Rules in Context.Corrado Roversi - 2010 - Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 96 (2):223-238.
Restructuring Searle’s Making the Social World.Frank Hindriks - 2013 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 43 (3):373-389.
Restructuring Searle’s Making the Social World.Frank Hindriks - 2013 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 43 (3):373-389.
Deconstructing Searle’s Making the Social World.Frank Hindriks - 2015 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 45 (3):363-369.
Rule following and the background.Jeffrey Hershfield - 2004 - Linguistics and Philosophy 28 (3):269 - 280.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-18

Downloads
40 (#396,692)

6 months
4 (#778,909)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Introduction.Marcelo Dascal - 2012 - Pragmatics and Cognition 20 (2):233-240.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references