Non enim corpus sentit, sed anima per corpus. Tommaso d’Aquino lettore di Agostino

In Fabrizio Amerini & Stefano Caroti (eds.), Ipsum verum non videbis nisi in philosophiam totus intraveris. Studi in onore di Franco De Capitani. Parma: E-theca OnLineOpenAccess Edizioni. pp. 
25-76 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The aim of this study is to illustrate the role played by Augustine’s Commentary on the Genesis in the writings of Thomas Aquinas. This work is of great importance for Aquinas, not only because it is the work where Augustine clarifies his interpretation of creation, but also because creation is, among the theological topics, perhaps the most philosophical, insofar as it gives the opportunity of elaborating on many philosophical issues. In particular, the goal of the study is to rethink the positions of Aquinas and Augustine on one of these issues, that is the relationship between soul and body. I mean to call into question two historiographical theses: first, that Augustine and Aquinas formulate positions that are irreconcilable with each other, and second, that they in no way address that which we today call the Mind-Body Problem.

Similar books and articles

The Nous-Body Problem in Aristotle.Deborah K. W. Modrak - 1991 - Review of Metaphysics 44 (4):755 - 774.
Nous in Aristotle's De Anima.Caleb Murray Cohoe - 2014 - Philosophy Compass 9 (9):594-604.
Commentary on Aristotle’s de Anima.Thomas Aquinas - 1951 - Yale University Press. Edited by O. P. Kenny & Joseph.
Averroës' Middle commentary on Aristotle's De anima: a critical edition of the Arabic text. Averroës - 2002 - Provo, Utah: Brigham Young University Press. Edited by Alfred L. Ivry.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-10-31

Downloads
260 (#77,984)

6 months
134 (#27,329)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Fabrizio Amerini
University of Parma

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references