Facing Disruptive Changes With Informal Workplace Learning Strategies: The Experience of European Companies

Frontiers in Psychology 13 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Industries are currently experiencing several kinds of disruptive changes, including digital transformation and environmental and health emergencies. Despite intense discussion about disruptive changes in companies, the impact of such changes on workplace learning is still underexplored. In this study, we investigated the impact of disruptive changes on informal learning practices according to the perspectives of employers, employees and adult educators. Informal learning was operationalised along a continuum between organised informal learning and everyday informal learning. Fifty-five companies’ representatives from three European countries and four industrial fields were interviewed. The interviews were further triangulated with questionnaires collected by employees from the same companies. Questionnaire data were used to collect detailed information on individual informal workplace learning strategies and digital technologies adopted in organised informal learning. The interview data were analysed using qualitative content analysis. A coding scheme was developed with five macro-categories organised into 23 sub-categories. Occurrence and co-occurrence analysis were performed to identify which individual and organisational factors and approaches support most learning, according to interviewees. Interviewees reported the possibility of interacting with colleagues and being autonomous as the main sources of everyday informal learning processes. Employees from the same companies reported model learning, vicarious feedback, and applying someone’s own ideas as the most frequent IWL strategies. Organised informal learning was mainly based on knowledge transfer, which reflects passive cognitive engagement by employees. Specifically, digital technologies in organised informal learning were poorly used for supporting reflection, constructive processes, and collaborative knowledge construction. The results suggest that participants believed that higher forms of cognitive engagement are possible only within face-to-face organised informal training or in everyday informal learning. Possible explanations of the results and practical implications are discussed.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,283

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Know-how and workplace practical judgement.Paul Hager - 2000 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 34 (2):281–296.
Know-How and Workplace Practical Judgement.Paul Hager - 2000 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 34 (2):281-296.
Workplace Pedagogic Practices: Co–participation and Learning.Stephen Billett - 2002 - British Journal of Educational Studies 50 (4):457-481.
Towards a Phenomenology of Harassment (Mobbing) at the Company.Moisés del Pino Peña - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 7:35-41.
Towards a Phenomenology of Harassment (mobbing) at the Company.del Pino Pe - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 7:35-41.
Informal Home Education: Philosophical Aspirations put into Practice.Alan Thomas & Harriet Pattison - 2012 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 32 (2):141-154.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-05-27

Downloads
3 (#1,715,951)

6 months
2 (#1,206,802)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?