Refuting Van Inwagen's 'refutation': Evidentialism again

International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 44 (1):23 - 29 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

2004

DOI

10.1023/a:1003260802150

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Does free will remain a mystery? A response to Van Inwagen.Meghan Elizabeth Griffith - 2005 - Philosophical Studies 124 (3):261-269.
Van Inwagen’s Consequence Argument.Michael Huemer - 2000 - Philosophical Review 109 (4):525-544.
Reply to Van Inwagen.Richard Foley - 1980 - Analysis 40 (March):101-103.
Van Inwagen, P.; Zimmerman, D. Metaphysics: The Big Questions.Peter van Inwagen - 1998
Nihilism without Self-Contradiction.David Liggins - 2008 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 62:177-196.
Why free will remains a mystery.Seth Shabo - 2011 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 92 (1):105-125.
Van Inwagen’s modal skepticism.Peter Hawke - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 153 (3):351-364.
Van Inwagen on free will.Peter Van Inwagen - 2001 - In Joseph K. Campbell (ed.), Freedom and Determinism. Cambridge MA: Bradford Book/MIT Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
242 (#85,840)

6 months
46 (#93,869)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mike Almeida
University of Texas at San Antonio

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references