Reconstruction or deconstruction?: A reply to Johanna Meehan

Philosophy and Social Criticism 26 (3):53-60 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I argue that Johanna Meehan's call to examine the extra-linguistic psychic, affective and biological dimensions of gender identity is extremely important both for feminist theory in particular and for contemporary Continental philosophy in general. However, I suspect that such an examination might necessitate more than a mere expansion or reconstruction of Habermas' views; on the contrary, I suggest that Meehan's line of argument might lead instead toward a radical deconstruction of Habermasian critical theory. Key Words: feminism • Habermas • identity • moral vs ethical.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,440

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Review essay: Feminism, critical theory, and power.Johanna Meehan - 2004 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 30 (3):375-382.
Feminism and Habermas' discourse ethics.Johanna Meehan - 2000 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 26 (3):39-52.
Interpretation and social science. [REVIEW]Johanna Meehan - 1997 - Human Studies 20 (4):429-440.
Reconstructing reason in the aftermath of deconstruction.Calvin O. Schrag - 1991 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 5 (2):247-260.
Higher-order consciousness and phenomenal space: Reply to Meehan.Barry F. Dainton - 2004 - PSYCHE: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Research On Consciousness 10.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
36 (#447,330)

6 months
2 (#1,206,545)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Amy Allen
Pennsylvania State University

References found in this work

Feminism and Habermas' discourse ethics.Johanna Meehan - 2000 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 26 (3):39-52.

Add more references