Laudan, Stein, and the Limits of Theorizing About Juridical Proof [Book Review]

Law and Philosophy 29 (2):195 - 230 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,707

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Explanationism all the way down.Ronald J. Allen - 2008 - Episteme 5 (3):pp. 320-328.
Counterfactual logic and the Hardy paradox: Remarks on Shimony and Stein's criticism of Stapp's proof.Tomasz Bigaj - unknown
Juridical proof and the best explanation.Michael S. Pardo & Ronald J. Allen - 2008 - Law and Philosophy 27 (3):223 - 268.
The definability of objective becoming in Minkowski spacetime.Rob Clifton & Mark Hogarth - 1995 - Synthese 103 (3):355 - 387.
Are there logical limits for science?E. M. Zemach - 1987 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 38 (4):527-532.
Evidence and proof.William Twining & Alex Stein (eds.) - 1992 - New York, NY: New York University Press.
Husserl and Stein.Richard Feist & William Sweet (eds.) - 2003 - The Council for Research in Values and Philosophy.
Normative naturalism and the challenge of relativism: Laudan versus Worrall on the justification of methodological principles.Howard Sankey - 1996 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 10 (1):37 – 51.
Laudan's naturalistic axiology.Karyn Freedman - 1999 - Philosophy of Science 66 (3):537.
The rules of trial, political morality and the costs of error: or, Is proof beyond a reasonable doubt doing more harm than good?Larry Laudan - 2011 - In Leslie Green & Brian Leiter (eds.), Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Law. New York: Oxford University Press.
A model of juridical acts: part 2: the operation of juridical acts. [REVIEW]Jaap Hage - 2011 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 19 (1):49-73.
Reading Stein—some guidelines for the perplexed: A review of Edith Stein by Sarah Borden and of Edith Stein: A philosophical prologue, 1913–1922 by Alasdair Macintyre. [REVIEW]Mette Lebech - 2007 - International Philosophical Quarterly 47 (1):103-112.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-09-30

Downloads
37 (#441,556)

6 months
4 (#846,927)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references