Encapsulation, inference and utterance interpretation

Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

1. People standardly communicate by uttering phrases or sentences with certain intonation patterns, accompanied by facial expressions, eye contact and often a variety of gestures. If all goes well...

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/0020174x.2023.2267084

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,497

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The explanatory project of Gricean pragmatics.Lars Dänzer - 2021 - Mind and Language 36 (5):683-706.
Does linguistic communication rest on inference?François Recanati - 2002 - Mind and Language 17 (1-2):105–126.
Speaker’s meaning and non-cancellability.Guangwu Feng - 2013 - Pragmatics and Cognition 21 (1):117-138.
Speaker’s meaning and non-cancellability.Guangwu Feng - 2013 - Pragmatics and Cognition 21 (1):117-138.
The indefeasibility of the inference that if not-A, then not-C.Ingrid van Canegem-Ardijns - 2010 - Journal of Pragmatics 42 (1):1-15.
Interpreting the Everyday.Robert Stecker - 2003 - In Interpretation and Construction. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. pp. 1–28.
Speaker meaning, utterance meaning and radical interpretation in Davidson’s ‘A nice derangement of epitaphs’.Imogen Smith - 2017 - Empedocles European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication 8 (2):205-219.
The Alleged Priority of Literal Interpretation.François Récanati - 1995 - Cognitive Science 19 (2):207-232.
Relevance Theory and the Saying/Implicating Distinction.Robyn Carston - 2004 - In . pp. 155--181.
I. Linguistic-pragmatic approaches to inference in law. Telling it slant : toward a taxonomy of deception / Laurence R. Horn ; Cooperation in Chinese courtroom discourse / Meizhen Liao and Yadi Sun ; Inference and intention in legal interpretation / Nicholas Allott and Benjamin Shaer ; Pragmatics and legal texts : how best to account for the gaps between literal meaning and communicative meaning / Brian G. Slocum ; One ambiguity, three legal approaches. [REVIEW]Lawrence M. Solan - 2017 - In Janet Giltrow & Dieter Stein (eds.), The pragmatic turn in law: inference and interpretation in legal discourse. De Gruyter Mouton.
Utterance Interpretation and Actual Intentions.Palle Leth - 2021 - Axiomathes 31 (3):279-298.
Utterance Interpretation and Actual Intentions.Palle Leth - 2019 - Axiomathes 31 (3):1-20.
Theory of mind in utterance interpretation: the case from clinical pragmatics.Louise Cummings - 2015 - Frontiers in Psychology 6.
From justification to modulation.Takahiro Otsu - 2018 - Pragmatics and Cognition 25 (2):337-362.
Modus tollens, modus shmollens: Contrapositive reasoning and the pragmatics of negation. Jean-Fran - 2007 - Thinking and Reasoning 13 (2):207 – 222.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-10-15

Downloads
31 (#520,333)

6 months
14 (#188,120)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Nicholas Allott
University of Oslo

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Meaning.Herbert Paul Grice - 1957 - Philosophical Review 66 (3):377-388.
What is inference?Paul Boghossian - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 169 (1):1-18.

View all 55 references / Add more references