Politics of the Body and Eugenic Discourse in Early Republican Turkey

Body and Society 11 (3):61-76 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the 1930s, the two primary goals of the Turkish state were to establish national unity and to modernize the country. The achievement of these goals was linked to the transformation of the human body in line with modern, rational and scientific values. The body politics of the new regime aspired to discipline society in order to create modern, healthy and dutiful citizens by regulating the human body in many spheres of life, including clothing, aesthetics, health, reproduction, childcare and housekeeping. Eugenics emerged as a part of the state’s hygienic and ethical regulation of the human body. The state abolished abortion, mandated pre-marital examinations of couples, established childcare institutions, educated mothers, and aimed to prevent epidemics and alcoholism. The Turkish eugenicists were a small group of medical doctors who were influential in shaping these public policies. In accordance with the general Republican discourse, the eugenicists were critical of both traditional society and the Ottoman regime. The eugenicists founded their criticism on the old regime’s ignorance of modern hygienic and reproductive practices. Although Turkish eugenic discourse was influenced by Western eugenics literature, it was also shaped by the particular concerns of the Kemalist regime such as natalism, childcare and social hygiene policies. The collectivist discourse of the Kemalist regime was so dominant that, in contrast to their European and American counterparts, the Turkish eugenicists were not at all concerned with ethnic and class diversity within society.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,654

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Republican Human Rights?Duncan Ivison - 2010 - European Journal of Political Theory 9 (1):31-47.
L'idealisation Kantienne de la république : Kant contre Rousseau.B. Bourgeois - 1993 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 55 (2):293 - 306.
The Tension between Law and Politics in the Modern Republican Tradition.Marco Geuna - 2013 - In Andreas Niederberger & Philipp Schink (eds.), Republican democracy: liberty, law and politics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Turkish Politics: Between Europe and Islam.Kyle Wallace - 2011 - Constellations (University of Alberta Student Journal) 2 (2):108-117.
Politics in the Early Years of Republican China.Chün-tu Hsüeh - 1974 - Chinese Studies in History 7 (3):3-18.
Two Republican Traditions.Philip Pettit - 2013 - In Andreas Niederberger & Philipp Schink (eds.), Republican democracy: liberty, law and politics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
A Kantian Republican Conception of Justice as Nondomination.Rainer Forst - 2013 - In Andreas Niederberger & Philipp Schink (eds.), Republican democracy: liberty, law and politics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Legal Modes and Democratic Citizens in Republican Theory.Galya Benarieh Ruffer - 2013 - In Andreas Niederberger & Philipp Schink (eds.), Republican democracy: liberty, law and politics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-18

Downloads
18 (#849,366)

6 months
5 (#686,768)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?