The ‘three domains of reality’: do we need them? A reply

Journal of Critical Realism 22 (5):924-927 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This is a brief reply to the roundtable entitled ‘Does critical realism need the concept of three domains of reality?’ in which Dave Elder-Vass, Tom Fryer, Ruth Porter Groff, Cristián Navarrete and...

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/14767430.2023.2261299

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,503

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Does critical realism need the concept of three domains of reality? A roundtable.Dave Elder-Vass, Tom Fryer, Ruth Porter Groff, Cristián Navarrete & Tobin Nellhaus - 2023 - Journal of Critical Realism 22 (2):222-239.
Replies.Noam Chomsky - 2003 - In Louise M. Antony & Norbert Hornstein (eds.), Chomsky and His Critics. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. pp. 255–328.
Evolutionary debunking arguments in three domains: Fact, value, and religion.S. Wilkins John & E. Griffiths Paul - 2012 - In James Maclaurin Greg Dawes (ed.), A New Science of Religion. Routledge.
Explaining the Quest and its prospects: Reply to Boghossian and Byrne.Barry Stroud - 2002 - Philosophical Studies 108 (1-2):239-247.
Bhikkhu Ñ??ananda’s Concept and Reality : A Reply to Stephen Evans.Bhikkhuni Dhammadinnā - 2018 - Buddhist Studies Review 34 (2):151-180.
Actions, Norms and Representations: Foundations of Anthropological Enquiry.Ladislav Holy & Milan Stuchlik - 1983 - Cambridge University Press.
A reply to Hilary Lawson.Anthony Smith - 1999 - In Alan Montefiore & David Vines (eds.), Integrity in the Public and Private Domains. Routledge. pp. 140.
A reply to Anthony Smith.Hilary Lawson - 1999 - In Alan Montefiore & David Vines (eds.), Integrity in the Public and Private Domains. Routledge. pp. 149.
Oriented domains in a thin film of La 0.8 Sr 0.2 MnO 3 --Reply to the comment by Dr I. MacLaren.X. Ma - 2003 - Philosophical Magazine 83 (7):933-934.
Reconstructing Bohr’s Reply to EPR in Algebraic Quantum Theory.Ozawa Masanao & Yuichiro Kitajima - 2012 - Foundations of Physics 42 (4):475-487.
Domains of discourse and the semantics of ambiguous utterances: a reply to Gauker.Kees Van Deemter - 1998 - Mind 107 (426):433-445.
A Reply to J. Patrick Mohr's 'Ultimate Reality and Symbol' "Ultimate Reality and Meaning" 3: 316-329.Albert C. Heinrich - 1981 - Ultimate Reality and Meaning 4 (4):316.
A response to lawson's reply,‚constructivism and domains of scientific knowledge'︁.J. Lythcott & R. Duschl - 1992 - Science Education 76 (1):119-120.
Constructivism and domains of scientific knowledge: A reply to Lythcott and Duschl.Anton E. Lawson - 1991 - Science Education 75 (4):481-488.
Mathematical models and reality: A constructivist perspective. [REVIEW]Christian Hennig - 2010 - Foundations of Science 15 (1):29-48.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-10-05

Downloads
12 (#1,077,002)

6 months
11 (#230,695)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Enlightened Common Sense: The Philosophy of Critical Realism.Roy Bhaskar & Mervyn Hartwig - 2016 - New York: Routledge. Edited by Mervyn Hartwig.

Add more references