Abstract

The subject of the shrines and those responsible for reviewing the Constitution is a necessary legitimate means in various constitutional systems, accompanied by changes in different societies and at all economic, social, cultural and political levels, Hence, we find that the Constitution may be confused by some material and linguistic mistakes and the survival of these leads to the arrangement of some effects that were not intended by the Constitution, and the difference of words and meanings may lead to different terms, and the change of names leads to the different names and different terms leads to different considerations Accordingly, the iraqi constitution in force made the authorities responsible for amending the Constitution in articles and, on the other hand, we note that the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran in 1979, when discussing the draft constitution, did not The Council of Experts mentions the principle that refers in time to the way the Constitution is amended only after the 1989 amendment, Chapter 14 and the 77th Principle were enshrined in the 100th, not usually the constitution, and the establishments and forces responsible for the review were specified, and we are trying to make a comparative vision between the Iraqi and Iranian constitutions on the shrines and those responsible for reviewing the constitution.