The myth of genetic determinism – again

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):885-886 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Lifelines mounts a vigorous attack on sociobiology on the utterly mistaken grounds that sociobiologists believe that genes single-handedly determine social behavior. The many previously published rebuttals to this pernicious criticism are conveniently ignored by the author.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,497

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Genetic disease, genetic testing and the clinician.Kelly C. Smith - 2001 - Journal of the American Medical Association 285 (1):91.
Behavioral neurogenetics beyond determinism.Wim E. Crusio - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):890-891.
A Logical Structure for Human Sociobiology.Steven J. C. Gaulin - 1986 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:75 - 86.
The fearless vampire conservator: Phillip Kitcher and genetic determinism.Paul E. Griffiths - 2006 - In Christoph Rehmann-Sutter & Eva M. Neumann-Held (eds.), Genes in Development: Rethinking the Molecular Paradigm. Duke University Press. pp. 175-198.
How to alienate your natural allies and attract your enemies.J. Richard Udry - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):911-911.
Genetic prediction: What are the limits?M. O. - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 32 (4):619-633.
Gene talk in sociobiology.Henry Howe & John Lyne - 1992 - Social Epistemology 6 (2):109-163.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
146 (#129,966)

6 months
10 (#280,381)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references