Argument in mixed company: Mom's Maxim vs. mill's principle: Aikin and Talisse argument in mixed company

Think 10 (27):31-43 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is impolite to discuss matters of religion or politics in mixed company. So goes the popular adage which all of us were supposed to have learned as children from our mothers. Let's call it Mom's Maxim. We tend to accept Mom's Maxim. But is it philosophically sound? In this short essay, we raise some objections to Mom's Maxim and make a case for an alternative which we call Mill's Principle.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,923

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Conceivability and modal knowledge.René van Woudenberg - 2006 - Metaphilosophy 37 (2):210–221.
Reasonable atheism: a moral case for respectful disbelief.Scott F. Aikin - 2011 - Amherst, N.Y.: Prometheus Books. Edited by Robert B. Talisse.
Gricean Quality.Matthew A. Benton - 2016 - Noûs 50 (4):689-703.
Mill's Antirealism.Christopher Macleod - 2016 - Philosophical Quarterly 66 (263):261-279.
Still Searching for a Pragmatist Pluralism.Robert B. Talisse & Scott F. Aikin - 2005 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 41 (1):145 - 160.
On the Enhanced Obligations of the Financial Holding Company in Chinese Law.Wei Sui & Jun Liu - 2008 - Nankai University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 6:121-127.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-23

Downloads
77 (#220,326)

6 months
14 (#200,610)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Scott Aikin
Vanderbilt University

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references