Islamic contradictory theology

Abstract

There are two overarching aims of the five collated papers that make up my thesis. The first is to demonstrate that making sense of an ineffable Islamic God in virtue of classical logic and various truth theories (under the purview of analytic philosophy) motivates a theological contradiction. The second is to offer a solution to this problem. I spend a substantial part of my thesis establishing the first of these aims. The reason for this is twofold. Firstly, it is to illustrate the incompatibility between an ineffable God of Islam and various modes of logical and metaphysical inquiry that fall under the purview of analytic philosophy. Although, it becomes increasingly evident that we cannot philosophically make sense of an absolute ineffable God, my inquiry still bears relevance. It offers a comprehensive insight into the logical and metaphysical perspectives that are responsible for motivating the theological contradiction in question. Secondly, fleshing out the various logical and metaphysical perspectives helps lay the theoretical groundwork for the solution. It is not my aim to establish the ineffability of God within the Islamic tradition. That is, I do not engage with Islamic theology beyond referring to, and teasing out, an ineffable view of God from selected Islamic theological sources. The primary focus of my work is to establish that theological contradictions are motivated when assessing them against certain (analytic) philosophical modes. This brings me to the second aim of my thesis, namely, the solution. After having established how an Islamic theological contradiction is motivated, it begs a solution. Prior to offering my solution, I evaluate the recent work on Christian contradictory theology by Jc Beall (2019, 2021). Beall’s proposed solution to the fundamental problem of Christology is what he calls ‘Contradictory Christology’. Although this may seem like a plausible solution for an Islamic theological contradiction, I argue to the contrary. Finally, I propose my own solution to the problem. I call this ‘Islamic Mystical Dialetheism’.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,150

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Religion in Modern Islamic Discourse.Abdulkader Tayob - 2009 - Columbia University Press.
The foundations of Islam and Islamic thought.Ariana Wolff (ed.) - 2018 - New York, NY: Britannica Educational Publishing.
Texts and studies on the development and history of Kalām.Richard M. Frank - 2005 - Burlington, VT: Ashgate. Edited by Dimitri Gutas.
Islam ist Barmherzigkeit: Grundzüge einer modernen Religion.Mouhanad Khorchide - 2012 - Bonn: BPB, Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung.
God and logic in Islam: the caliphate of reason.John Walbridge - 2011 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
al-Kufr al-mubāḥ.Zakarīyā Awzūn - 2020 - ʻĀbdīn, al-Qāhirah, Miṣr: Ruʼyah lil-Nashr wa-al-Tawzīʻ.
From Logic in Islam to Islamic Logic.Musa Akrami - 2017 - Logica Universalis 11 (1):61-83.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-01-10

Downloads
10 (#1,196,922)

6 months
4 (#796,002)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references