A Critique of Expertise for Health Law

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 50 (4):682-686 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A health justice approach requires a progressive critique of expertise. This article considers two recent high-profile cases – the mask mandate and medication abortion -- to understand how we should think the mobilization of expertise in the context of public health law. Following from this, the article offers news ways to better understand how to think of the relationship between health law, expertise, and politics.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,991

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ethical expertise revisited.Bert Gordijn & Wim Dekkers - 2008 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 11 (2):125-126.
Employing patient expertise: Introduction to the theme. [REVIEW]David Badcott - 2005 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 8 (2):147-148.
Is ethical expertise possible?Jukka Varelius - 2008 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 11 (2):127-132.
INTRODUCTION: What is Health Justice?Lindsay F. Wiley, Ruqaiijah Yearby, Brietta R. Clark & Seema Mohapatra - 2022 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 50 (4):636-640.
The Impact of Dobbs on Health Care Beyond Wanted Abortion Care.Maya Manian - 2023 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 51 (3):592-600.
Is Ethical Expertise Possible?Jukka Varelius - 2008 - Medicine Health Care and Philosophy 11 (2):127-132.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-03-10

Downloads
6 (#1,483,069)

6 months
3 (#1,045,430)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references