British industrial relations paradigm: A critical outline history and prognosis

Abstract

This article reflects critically on the history of the British pluralist industrial relations (IR) paradigm, from its foundation by Flanders and Clegg at Oxford in the 1950s, through its development and consolidation in both public policy and academic circles. No sooner was the paradigm firmly established with the 1968 Donovan Report and 1970 foundation of the Industrial Relations Research Unit at Warwick University (among other markers), than it faced new challenges and, arguably breakdown. These challenges came, first, from 1970s New Left Marxism, riding on a tide of industrial and student unrest, and then from 1980s Thatcherism and the destruction of workplace industrial relations. The article concludes by outlining six main strengths of the British IR paradigm and looking forward to how IR can regain its relevance in the very different world of work that lies ahead.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,813

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Technology and prognostic predicaments.Don Ihde - 1999 - AI and Society 13 (1-2):44-51.
Behind clio's mask: Philosophic history and its uses today.Ralph Buultjens - 1993 - Ethics and International Affairs 7:153–169.
The implications of the thinking paradigms of British neo-Marxism.Ji Xue & Zhongfang Tong - 2022 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 54 (11):1796-1802.
The Hermes Effect. An Analytical Study in Theoretical Semiotics.Michał R. Węsierski - 2016 - Studia Semiotyczne—English Supplement 28:150-172.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
13 (#1,060,385)

6 months
3 (#1,036,110)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references