A Critical Approach to Plantinga’s Felix Culpa Argument

The Catholic Philosophy 28:5-38 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.16895/cathp.2017.28.1.005

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,347

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Are Sin and Evil Necessary for a Really Good World?Kevin Diller - 2008 - Faith and Philosophy 25 (1):87-101.
Plantinga's Defence and His Theodicy are Incompatible.Richard Brian Davis & W. Paul Franks - 2017 - In Klaas J. Kraay (ed.), Does God Matter?: Essays on the Axiological Consequences of Theism. Routledge. pp. 203–223.
Plantinga on “Felix Culpa”.Marilyn McCord Adams - 2008 - Faith and Philosophy 25 (2):123-140.
Where the conflict really lies: Plantinga, the challenge of evil, and religious naturalism.Elizabeth D. Burns - 2014 - Philosophia Reformata 79 (1):66-82.
Atonement’s Axiological Boundaries.Yishai Cohen - 2017 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 9 (3):177-195.
The Primigenius Felix Culpa.Harvey Cawdron - 2022 - Heythrop Journal 63 (6):1071-1088.
The Primigenius Felix Culpa.Harvey Cawdron - 2022 - Heythrop Journal 63 (6):1071-1088.
Super Mario Strikes Back: Another Molinist Reply to Welty’s Gunslingers Argument.Tyler Dalton McNabb - 2018 - Perichoresis 16 (2):45-53.
In Defense of Classical Foundationalism: A Critical Evaluation of Plantinga’s Argument that Classical Foundationalism is Self-Refuting.John M. DePoe - 2007 - South African Journal of Philosophy 26 (3):245-251.
Plantinga, God, and (yet) other minds.Robert J. Richman - 1972 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 50 (1):40 – 54.
Response to Churchland.Aaron Segal & Alvin Plantinga - 2010 - Philo 13 (2):201-207.
What kind of Classical Foundationalism has Plantinga refuted?Ralf-Thomas Klein - 2009 - South African Journal of Philosophy 28 (3):304-311.
Plantinga, hartshorne, and the ontological argument.Patrick Grim - 1981 - Sophia 20 (2):12-16.
What kind of Classical Foundationalism has Plantinga refuted?R.-T. Klein - 2009 - South African Journal of Philosophy 28 (3).
Interpreting the probabilities in Plantinga’s evolutionary argument against naturalism.Gary Neels - forthcoming - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion:1-13.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-01-17

Downloads
7 (#1,392,801)

6 months
5 (#648,315)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references