Análisis estructuralista de la teoría de la anomia

Metatheoria 4 (2):09-22 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Although we may find the concept of anomie in Greek thought, it is since Durkheim that the concept begins to be used specifically as a sociological concept. However, a theory of anomie only becomes consolidated since “Social Structure and Anomie” by Robert K. Merton (Merton 1938). The theory becomes important and conquers its space in the rest of the century as one of the most productive theories about deviance. In this study, based on a contemporary conception of scientific theory, that of the structuralist metatheory, a reconstruction of Merton’s approach is proposed, allowing to make explicit the deep structure of the theory.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Creating and Maintaining Ethical Work Climates.Deborah Vidaver Cohen - 1993 - Business Ethics Quarterly 3 (4):343-358.
Creating and Maintaining Ethical Work Climates.Deborah Vidaver Cohen - 1993 - Business Ethics Quarterly 3 (4):343-358.
Turner on Merton.Joseph Agassi - 2009 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 39 (2):284-293.
An Exploration of Factors Affecting Work Anomia.Eva E. Tsahuridu - 2011 - Journal of Business Ethics 99 (2):297 - 305.
A more sophisticated Merton.Harold Kincaid - 2009 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 39 (2):266-271.
Defending Liberalism Against the Anomie Challenge.Andrew J. Cohen - 2004 - Social Theory and Practice 30 (3):391-427.
The assault badly misses the mark: (Comment on Stephen turner).Piotr Sztompka - 2009 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 39 (2):260-265.
Anomie and Ethics at Work.Eva E. Tsahuridu - 2006 - Journal of Business Ethics 69 (2):163-174.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-03-27

Downloads
412 (#48,549)

6 months
61 (#77,691)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

An Architectonic for Science.Wolfgang Balzer, C. Ulises Moulines & Joseph D. Sneed - 1990 - Philosophy of Science 57 (2):349-350.

Add more references