In Defense of Routine Recovery of Cadaveric Organs: A Response to Walter Glannon

&
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 17 (3):337-343 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Walter Glannon argues that our proposal for routine recovery of transplantable cadaveric organs is unacceptable After carefully reviewing his counterarguments, we conclude that, although some of them have merit, none are sufficiently strong to warrant abandoning this plan. Below we respond to each of Glannon's concerns

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1017/s0963180108080419

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,829

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Conscription of Cadaveric Organs for Transplantation: Neglected Again.Aaron Spital - 2003 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 13 (2):169-174.
The Case against Conscription of Cadaveric Organs for Transplantation.Walter Glannon - 2008 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 17 (3):330-336.
Do the sick have a right to cadaveric organs?W. Glannon - 2003 - Journal of Medical Ethics 29 (3):153-156.
Conscription of Cadaveric Organs for Transplantation: A Stimulating Idea Whose Time Has Not Yet Come.Aaron Spital - 2005 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 14 (1):107-112.
Review of T. M. Wilkinson, Ethics and the Acquisition of Organs: Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2011, x 209 pp. ISBN 978-0-19-960786-0, US$65 Hb. [REVIEW]Walter Glannon - 2012 - Journal of Value Inquiry 46 (3):379-382.
Response to “Intrafamilial Organ Donation Is Often an Altruistic Act” by Aaron Spital and “Donor Benefit Is the Key to Justified Living Organ Donation,” by Aaron Spital : Motivation, Risk, and Benefit in Living Organ Donation: A Reply to Aaron Spital. [REVIEW]Walter Glannon & Lainie Friedman Ross - 2005 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 14 (2):191-194.
A response to Walter Glannon.John Harris - 2002 - Bioethics 16 (3):284–291.
Response to “Intrafamilial Organ Donation Is Often an Altruistic Act” by Aaron Spital and “Donor Benefit Is the Key to Justified Living Organ Donation,” by Aaron Spital : Reply to Glannon and Ross. [REVIEW]Aaron Spital - 2005 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 14 (2):195-198.
Routine Retrieval of Organs as an Alternative to Xenografts: Moral Considerations of Communitarian Ethics.Buffalo Hilton - unknown
Of community, organs and obligations: Routine salvage with a twist.Erich H. Loewy - 1996 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 17 (1).
Presumed consent, autonomy, and organ donation.Michael B. Gill - 2004 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 29 (1):37 – 59.
Neuroethics.Walter Glannon - 2005 - Bioethics 20 (1):37–52.
Reply to Harris.Walter Glannon - 2002 - Bioethics 16 (3):292–297.
Epicureanism and Death.Walter Glannon - 1993 - The Monist 76 (2):222-234.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
57 (#280,725)

6 months
6 (#518,648)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

The Organ Conscription Trolley Problem.Adam Kolber - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (8):13-14.
Pardon My Asking: What's New?D. Micah Hester & Toby Schonfeld - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (8):11-13.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Organ procurement: dead interests, living needs.J. Harris - 2003 - Journal of Medical Ethics 29 (3):130-134.
Are organs personal property or a societal resource?Robert D. Truog - 2005 - American Journal of Bioethics 5 (4):14 – 16.
The Case against Conscription of Cadaveric Organs for Transplantation.Walter Glannon - 2008 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 17 (3):330-336.

Add more references