Results for 'response bias'

999 found
Order:
  1.  19
    On Response Bias in the Face Congruency Effect for Internal and External Features.Günter Meinhardt, Bozana Meinhardt-Injac & Malte Persike - 2017 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 11:276024.
    Some years ago Cheung et al. (2008) proposed the complete design (CD) for measuring the failure of selective attention in composite objects. Since the CD is a fully balanced design, analysis of response bias may reveal potential effects of the experimental manipulation, the stimulus material, and/or attributes of the observers. Here we used the CD to prove whether external features modulate perception of internal features with the context congruency paradigm (Meinhardt-Injac et al., 2010; Nachson et al., 1995) in (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2.  9
    Confirmational Response Bias Among Social Work Journals.William M. Epstein - 1990 - Science, Technology and Human Values 15 (1):9-38.
    This article reports the results of a study of confirmational response bias among social work journals. A contrived research paper with positive findings and its negative mirror image were submitted to two different groups of social work journals and to two comparison groups of journals outside social work. The quantitative results, suggesting bias, are tentative; but the qualitative findings based upon an analysis of the referee comments are clear and consistent. Few referees from prestigious or nonprestcgrous social (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   44 citations  
  3.  42
    Response Bias Correction in the Process Dissociation Procedure: A Reevaluation?Eyal Reingold - 1995 - Consciousness and Cognition 5 (4):595-603.
    A Buchner and E. Erdfelder (this volume) provide a commentary on our analysis of response bias correction in the process dissociation procedure. Unfortunately, this commentary fails to address the substantive issues that were raised in M. J. Wainwright and E. M. Reingold (1996). In the present article, we attempt to clarify some of their misrepresentations and the inconsistency inherent in their position. ©1996 Academic Press..
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  4.  49
    Response Bias Correction in the Process Dissociation Procedure: Approaches, Assumptions, and Evaluation.Eyal Reingold - 1995 - Consciousness and Cognition 5 (1-2):232-254.
    Buchner, Erdfelder, and Vaterrodt-Plunnecke (1995) advocated an exposition of the process dissociation procedure within the framework of multinomial modeling. Among the misleading aspects of this exposition is its tendency to obscure the overlap between processes. In contrast, clarifying these crucial interactions leads to a general classification of response bias corrections to the process dissociation procedure. This scheme, in which corrective models are classified on the basis of process interactions, clarifies the assumptions underlying previously proposed corrections. As an illustration (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  5. The social desirability response bias in ethics research.Donna M. Randall & Maria F. Fernandes - 1991 - Journal of Business Ethics 10 (11):805 - 817.
    This study examines the impact of a social desirability response bias as a personality characteristic (self-deception and impression management) and as an item characteristic (perceived desirability of the behavior) on self-reported ethical conduct. Findings from a sample of college students revealed that self-reported ethical conduct is associated with both personality and item characteristics, with perceived desirability of behavior having the greatest influence on self-reported conduct. Implications for research in business ethics are drawn, and suggestions are offered for reducing (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   224 citations  
  6.  33
    Response bias explanation of conservative human inference.Wesley M. DuCharme - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 85 (1):66.
  7.  16
    Response bias and perception.Charles D. Smock & Frederick H. Kanfer - 1961 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 62 (2):158.
  8.  14
    Response bias in the recognition of pictures and names by children.Bill Jones - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 103 (6):1214.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9.  16
    Response bias modulates the speech motor system during syllable discrimination.Jonathan Venezia - 2012 - Frontiers in Psychology 3.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  10.  79
    Social Desirability Response Bias, Gender, and Factors Influencing Organizational Commitment: An International Study.Richard A. Bernardi & Steven T. Guptill - 2008 - Journal of Business Ethics 81 (4):797-809.
    This research is an extension of Walker Information’s (Business Ethics: Ethical Decision Making and Cases, pp. 235–255, 1999) study on employees’ job attitudes that was conducted exclusively in the United States. Walker Information found that the reputation of the organization, fairness at work, care, and concern for employees, trust in employees, and resources available at work were important factors in an employee’s decision to remain with his or her company. Our sample includes 713 students from seven countries: Canada, Colombia, Ecuador, (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  11.  12
    Response bias, criteria settings, and the fast-same phenomenon: A reply to Ratcliff.Robert W. Proctor - 1986 - Psychological Review 93 (4):473-477.
  12.  10
    Response bias in relational reasoning.Stephen E. Newstead, Paul Pollard & Richard A. Griggs - 1986 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 24 (2):95-98.
  13.  10
    Response-bias interpretation of "Perceptual Defense." A selective review and an evaluation of recent research.James G. Minard - 1965 - Psychological Review 72 (1):74-88.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  14.  21
    Response bias patterns in young children.Michael Siegal & Luca Surian - 2004 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8 (12):534-538.
  15. Separating response bias from judgment in statement verification.Ts Wallsten, Cg Gonzalez & O. Strickland - 1991 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 29 (6):530-530.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  16.  16
    Response bias in the yoked control procedure.Edward A. Wasserman - 1988 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11 (3):477.
  17.  10
    Sensitivity and response bias effects in the learning of familiar and unfamiliar associations by rote or with a mnemonic.D. Mcnicol & L. A. Ryder - 1971 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 90 (1):81.
  18.  21
    Word-frequency effect and response bias.D. E. Broadbent - 1967 - Psychological Review 74 (1):1-15.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   34 citations  
  19.  36
    Social Conformity and Response Bias Revisited: The Influence of "Others" on Japanese Respondents.Chisuzu Kondo, Chiaki Saito, Ayaka Deguchi, Miki Hirayama & Adam Acar - 2010 - Human Affairs 20 (4):356-363.
    Social Conformity and Response Bias Revisited: The Influence of "Others" on Japanese Respondents This study was undertaken to investigate the impact of other respondents' answers on individual responses in survey studies. The study employed four different conditions and manipulated the direction and the level of social pressure. The results have confirmed that social desirability bias hugely impacts individual answers. It was found that respondents are seven times more likely to choose a socially unacceptable option if majority of (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  20.  15
    Sensitivity and response bias in fear of spiders.Eni Becker & Mike Rinck - 2004 - Cognition and Emotion 18 (7):961-976.
  21.  54
    Associations between Hofstede’s Cultural Constructs and Social Desirability Response Bias.Richard A. Bernardi - 2006 - Journal of Business Ethics 65 (1):43 - 53.
    This paper examines the associations among social desirability response bias, cultural constructs and gender. The study includes the responses of 1537 students from 12 countries including Australia, Canada, China, Colombia, Ecuador, Hong Kong, Ireland, Japan, Nepal, South Africa, Spain, and the United States. The results of the analysis indicate that, on average, social desirability response bias decreases (increases) as a country’s Individualism (Uncertainty Avoidance) increases. The analysis also indicates that women scored significantly higher on Paulhus’ Image (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   28 citations  
  22.  33
    Perceptual versus response bias in discrete choice reaction time.Harold L. Hawkins, Gerald B. Thomas & Kenneth B. Drury - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 84 (3):514.
  23.  16
    Reward motivation influences response bias on a recognition memory task.Holly J. Bowen, Michelle L. Marchesi & Elizabeth A. Kensinger - 2020 - Cognition 203:104337.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  24.  18
    Genuine memory bias versus response bias in anxiety.Margaret Dowens & Manuel Calvo - 2003 - Cognition and Emotion 17 (6):843-857.
  25.  25
    Differential discriminability of response bias? A signal detection analysis for categorical perception.James Kopp & James Livermore - 1973 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 101 (1):179.
  26.  9
    Comments on Broadbent's response bias model for stimulus recognition.Lloyd H. Nakatani - 1970 - Psychological Review 77 (6):574-576.
  27.  25
    The Dark Triad and the PID-5 Maladaptive Personality Traits: Accuracy, Confidence and Response Bias in Judgments of Veracity.Benno G. Wissing & Marc-André Reinhard - 2017 - Frontiers in Psychology 8:273619.
    The Dark Triad traits – narcissism, Machiavellianism and psychopathy – have been found to be associated with intra- or interpersonal deception production frequency. This cross-sectional study (N = 207) investigated if the Dark Triad traits are also associated with deception detection accuracy, as implicated by the recent conception of a deception-general ability. To investigate associations between maladaptive personality space and deception, the PID-5 maladaptive personality traits were included to investigate if besides Machiavellianism, Detachment is negatively associated with response (...). Finally, associations between the Dark Triad traits, Antagonism, Negative Affectivity and confidence judgments were investigated. Participants watched videos of lying vs. truth-telling senders and judged the truthfulness of the statements. None of the Dark Triad traits was found to be associated with the ability to detect deception. Detachment was negatively associated with response bias. Psychopathy was associated with global confidence judgments. The results provide additional support that dark and maladaptive personality traits are associated with judgmental biases but not with accuracy in deception detection. The internal consistencies of 4 of the 8 subscales of the used personality short scales were only low and nearly sufficient (αs =.65–.69). (shrink)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  28.  20
    Associations between Hofstede’s Cultural Constructs and Social Desirability Response Bias.Richard A. Bernardi - 2006 - Journal of Business Ethics 65 (1):43-53.
    This paper examines the associations among social desirability response bias, cultural constructs and gender. The study includes the responses of 1537 students from 12 countries including Australia, Canada, China, Colombia, Ecuador, Hong Kong, Ireland, Japan, Nepal, South Africa, Spain, and the United States. The results of the analysis indicate that, on average, social desirability response bias decreases as a country's Individualism increases. The analysis also indicates that women scored significantly higher on Paulhus' Image Management Subscale on (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   25 citations  
  29.  1
    Reflections on "Confirmational Response Bias Among Social Work Journals".June Gary Hopps - 1990 - Science, Technology and Human Values 15 (1):39-45.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  30.  30
    Implicit Bias and Philosophy, Volumes 2: Moral Responsibility, Structural Injustice, and Ethics.Michael S. Brownstein & Jennifer Mather Saul (eds.) - 2016 - Oxford University Press UK.
    At the University of Sheffield between 2011 and 2012, a leading group of philosophers, psychologists, and others gathered to explore the nature and significance of implicit bias. The two volumes of Implicit Bias and Philosophy emerge from these workshops. Each volume philosophically examines core areas of psychological research on implicit bias as well as the ramifications of implicit bias for core areas of philosophy. Volume II: Moral Responsibility, Structural Injustice, and Ethics is comprised of three parts. (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   18 citations  
  31.  95
    Gender Differences in Ethics Research: The Importance of Controlling for the Social Desirability Response Bias[REVIEW]Derek Dalton & Marc Ortegren - 2011 - Journal of Business Ethics 103 (1):73-93.
    Gender is one of the most frequently studied variables within the ethics literature. In prior studies that find gender differences, females consistently report more ethical responses than males. However, prior research also indicates that females are more prone to responding in a socially desirable fashion. Consequently, it is uncertain whether gender differences in ethical decision-making exist because females are more ethical or perhaps because females are more prone to the social desirability response bias. Using a sample of 30 (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   35 citations  
  32.  26
    Machiavellianism, Moral Orientation, Social Desirability Response Bias, and Anti-intellectualism: A Profile of Canadian Accountants.Anis Triki, Gail Lynn Cook & Darlene Bay - 2017 - Journal of Business Ethics 144 (3):623-635.
    Prior research has demonstrated that accountants differ from the general population on many personality traits. Understanding accountants’ personality traits is important when these characteristics may impact professional behavior or ability to work with members of the business community. Our study investigates the relationship between Machiavellianism, ethical orientation, anti-intellectualism, and social desirability response bias in Canadian accountants. We find that Canadian accountants score much higher on the Machiavellianism scale than U.S. accountants. Additionally, our results show a significant relationship between (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  33.  11
    The importance and efficacy of controlling for social desirability response bias.Richard A. Bernardi & Jonathan Nash - 2023 - Ethics and Behavior 33 (5):413-429.
    The extant literature acknowledges social desirability response bias (SDRB) is a pervasive issue for research that uses survey data and proposes several approaches to mitigating the issue, including: self-administered questionnaires, indirect questioning, and direct measurement. The objective of this study is to provide empirical evidence related to the importance of controlling for SDRB and the efficacy of these approaches. Using a primary sample of 365 business majors, we find the most common methodologies used to control for SDRB, self-administered (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  34.  10
    Perception as a function of association value with response bias controlled.Stephanie Portnoy, Maurice Portnoy & Kurt Salzinger - 1964 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 68 (3):316.
  35. The precision of experienced action video-game players: Line bisection reveals reduced leftward response bias.Andrew J. Latham, Lucy L. M. Patston & Lynette J. Tippett - 2014 - Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics 76 (8):2193-2198.
    Twenty-two experienced action video-game players (AVGPs) and 18 non-VGPs were tested on a pen-and-paper line bisection task that was untimed. Typically, right-handers bisect lines 2 % to the left of true centre, a bias thought to reflect the dominance of the right-hemisphere for visuospatial attention. Expertise may affect this bias, with expert musicians showing no bias in line bisection performance. Our results show that experienced-AVGPs also bisect lines with no bias with their right hand and a (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  36.  34
    Subconscious detection of threat as reflected by an enhanced response bias.Sabine Windmann & Thomas Krüger - 1998 - Consciousness and Cognition 7 (4):603-633.
    Neurobiological and cognitive models of unconscious information processing suggest that subconscious threat detection can lead to cognitive misinterpretations and false alarms, while conscious processing is assumed to be perceptually and conceptually accurate and unambiguous. Furthermore, clinical theories suggest that pathological anxiety results from a crude preattentive warning system predominating over more sophisticated and controlled modes of processing. We investigated the hypothesis that subconscious detection of threat in a cognitive task is reflected by enhanced ''false signal'' detection rather than by selectively (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  37.  49
    Individual differences in metacontrast masking regarding sensitivity and response bias.Thorsten Albrecht & Uwe Mattler - 2012 - Consciousness and Cognition 21 (3):1222-1231.
    In metacontrast masking target visibility is modulated by the time until a masking stimulus appears. The effect of this temporal delay differs across participants in such a way that individual human observers’ performance shows distinguishable types of masking functions which remain largely unchanged for months. Here we examined whether individual differences in masking functions depend on different response criteria in addition to differences in discrimination sensitivity. To this end we reanalyzed previously published data and conducted a new experiment for (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  38.  14
    Effects of delay of knowledge of results and subject response bias on extinction of a simple motor skill.James A. Dyal - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 71 (4):559.
  39.  26
    Assessing the belief bias effect with ROCs: It's a response bias effect.Chad Dube, Caren M. Rotello & Evan Heit - 2010 - Psychological Review 117 (3):831-863.
  40.  14
    Relationship between word frequency and recognition: Perceptual process or response bias?Robert B. Zajonc & B. Nieuwenhuyse - 1964 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 67 (3):276.
  41. Epistemic Responsibility and Implicit Bias.Nancy McHugh & Lacey J. Davidson - 2020 - In Erin Beeghly & Alex Madva (eds.), An Introduction to Implicit Bias: Knowledge, Justice, and the Social Mind. New York, NY, USA: Routledge. pp. 174-190.
    A topic of special importance when it comes to responsibility and implicit bias is responsibility for knowledge. Are there strategies for becoming more responsible and respectful knowers? How might we work together, not just as individuals but members of collectives, to reduce the negative effects of bias on what we see and believe, as well as the wrongs associated with epistemic injustice? To explore these questions, Chapter 9 introduces the concept of epistemic responsibility, a set of practices developed (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  42.  22
    Reaction time as a function of perceptual bias, response bias, and stimulus discriminability.Howard B. Orenstein - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 86 (1):38.
  43. Implicit Bias, Moods, and Moral Responsibility.Alex Madva - 2017 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 99 (S1):53-78.
    Are individuals morally responsible for their implicit biases? One reason to think not is that implicit biases are often advertised as unconscious, ‘introspectively inaccessible’ attitudes. However, recent empirical evidence consistently suggests that individuals are aware of their implicit biases, although often in partial and inarticulate ways. Here I explore the implications of this evidence of partial awareness for individuals’ moral responsibility. First, I argue that responsibility comes in degrees. Second, I argue that individuals’ partial awareness of their implicit biases makes (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  44. Stem completion versus cued-recall-the role of response bias.Em Reingold & Pm Merikle - 1991 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 29 (6):521-521.
  45.  2
    Improving the Quality of Social Welfare Scholarship: Response to "Confirmational Response Bias".John R. Schuerman - 1990 - Science, Technology and Human Values 15 (1):56-61.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  46.  64
    Is the emotional modulation of the attentional blink driven by response bias?Helen Tibboel, Bram Van Bockstaele & Jan De Houwer - 2011 - Cognition and Emotion 25 (7):1176-1183.
  47.  13
    Emotion-induced modulation of recognition memory decisions in a Go/NoGo task: Response bias or memory bias?Sabine Windmann & Adam Chmielewski - 2008 - Cognition and Emotion 22 (5):761-776.
  48.  17
    Implicit and explicit memory and response bias.J. Anthony Deutsch - 1992 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 30 (6):505-508.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  49.  22
    Emotional processing in Parkinson’s disease and schizophrenia: evidence for response bias deficits in PD.Ilona P. Laskowska, Ludwika Gawryś, Szymon Łęski & Dariusz Koziorowski - 2015 - Frontiers in Psychology 6.
  50.  4
    Journals Have Obligations, Too: Commentary on "Confirmational Response Bias".Rachelle D. Hollander - 1990 - Science, Technology and Human Values 15 (1):46-49.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
1 — 50 / 999