Results for 'incomparability'

510 found
Order:
  1. Vagueness, Incomparability, and the Collapsing Principle.Erik Carlson - 2013 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (3):449-463.
    John Broome has argued that incomparability and vagueness cannot coexist in a given betterness order. His argument essentially hinges on an assumption he calls the ‘collapsing principle’. In an earlier article I criticized this principle, but Broome has recently expressed doubts about the cogency of my criticism. Moreover, Cristian Constantinescu has defended Broome’s view from my objection. In this paper, I present further arguments against the collapsing principle, and try to show that Constantinescu’s defence of Broome’s position fails.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations  
  2. Seeming incomparability and rational choice.Leo Yan - 2022 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 21 (4):347-371.
    Politics, Philosophy & Economics, Volume 21, Issue 4, Page 347-371, November 2022. We sometimes have to choose between options that are seemingly incomparable insofar as they seem to be neither better than, worse than, nor equal to each other. This often happens when the available options are quite different from one another. For instance, consider a choice between prioritizing either criminal justice reform or healthcare reform as a public policy goal. Even after the relevant details of the goals and possible (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  3. Value Incomparability and Incommensurability.Ruth Chang - 2015 - In Iwao Hirose & Jonas Olson (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Value Theory. Oxford University Press.
    This introductory article describes the phenomena of incommensurability and incomparability, how they are related, and why they are important. Since incomparability is the more significant phenomenon, the paper takes that as its focus. It gives a detailed account of what incomparability is, investigates the relation between the incomparability of values and the incomparability of alternatives for choice, distinguishes incomparability from the related phenomena of parity, indeterminacy, and noncomparability, and, finally, defends a view about practical (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   25 citations  
  4. Value Incomparability and Indeterminacy.Cristian Constantinescu - 2012 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (1):57-70.
    Two competing accounts of value incomparability have been put forward in the recent literature. According to the standard account, developed most famously by Joseph Raz, ‘incomparability’ means determinate failure of the three classic value relations ( better than , worse than , and equally good ): two value-bearers are incomparable with respect to a value V if and only if (i) it is false that x is better than y with respect to V , (ii) it is false (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   24 citations  
  5. Parity, incomparability and rationally justified choice.Martijn Boot - 2009 - Philosophical Studies 146 (1):75 - 92.
    This article discusses the possibility of a rationally justified choice between two options neither of which is better than the other while they are not equally good either (‘3NT’). Joseph Raz regards such options as incomparable and argues that reason cannot guide the choice between them. Ruth Chang, by contrast, tries to show that many cases of putative incomparability are instead cases of parity—a fourth value relation of comparability, in addition to the three standard value relations ‘better than’, ‘worse (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  6. Incomparable numbers.Kenneth Walden - 2020 - Oxford Studies in Normative Ethics 10.
    This chapter presents arguments for two slightly different versions of the thesis that the value of persons is incomparable. Both arguments allege an incompatibility between the demands of a certain kind of practical reasoning and the presuppositions of value comparisons. The significance of these claims is assessed in the context of the “Numbers problem”—the question of whether one morally ought to benefit one group of potential aid recipients rather than another simply because they are greater in number. It is argued (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  7. Incommensurability, incomparability, and practical reason.Ruth Chang (ed.) - 1997 - Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard.
    Can quite different values be rationally weighed against one another? Can the value of one thing always be ranked as greater than, equal to, or less than the value of something else? If the answer to these questions is no, then in what areas do we find commensurability and comparability unavailable? And what are the implications for moral and legal decision making? This book struggles with these questions, and arrives at distinctly different answers.".
  8.  83
    Is incomparability a problem for anyone?Nien-hê Hsieh - 2007 - Economics and Philosophy 23 (1):65-80.
    The incomparability of alternatives is thought to pose a problem for justified choice, particularly for proponents of comparativism better than,worse than,equally good,roughly equalon a par. namely, rejection of the transitivity of the relation In this paper, I argue that proponents of comparativism need not incur this cost. I defend the possibility of justified choice between incomparable alternatives on grounds that comparativists can accept. The possibility of incomparability has been met with resistance, in part because of the intuitive appeal (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  9. Evidential Incomparability and the Principle of Indifference.Martin Smith - 2015 - Erkenntnis 80 (3):605-616.
    The _Principle of Indifference_ was once regarded as a linchpin of probabilistic reasoning, but has now fallen into disrepute as a result of the so-called _problem of multiple of partitions_. In ‘Evidential symmetry and mushy credence’ Roger White suggests that we have been too quick to jettison this principle and argues that the problem of multiple partitions rests on a mistake. In this paper I will criticise White’s attempt to revive POI. In so doing, I will argue that what underlies (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  10.  49
    Is Incomparability a Problem for Anyone?Nien-hê Hsieh - 2007 - Economics and Philosophy 23 (1):65-80.
    The incomparability of alternatives is thought to pose a problem for justified choice, particularly for proponents ofcomparativism– the view that comparative facts about alternatives determine what one rationally ought to choose. As a solution, it has been argued that alternatives judged incomparable by one of the three standard comparative relations, “better than,” “worse than,” and “equally good,” are comparable by some fourth relation, such as “roughly equal” or “on a par.” This solution, however, comes at what many would regard (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  11.  15
    Incomparable Values: Analysis, Axiomatics and Applications.John Nolt - 2021 - New York, NY: Routledge.
    People tend to rank values of all kinds linearly from good to bad, but there is little reason to think that this is reasonable or correct. This book argues, to the contrary, that values are often partially ordered and hence frequently incomparable. Proceeding logically from a small set of axioms, John Nolt examines the great variety of partially ordered value structures, exposing fallacies that arise from overlooking them. He reveals various ways in which incomparability is obscured: using linear indices (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  12.  18
    Incomparable prime ideals of recursively enumerable degrees.William C. Calhoun - 1993 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 63 (1):39-56.
    Calhoun, W.C., Incomparable prime ideals of recursively enumerable degrees, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 63 39–56. We show that there is a countably infinite antichain of prime ideals of recursively enumerable degrees. This solves a generalized form of Post's problem.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  13.  93
    Theories incomparable with respect to relative interpretability.Richard Montague - 1962 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 27 (2):195-211.
  14. Epistemic entrenchment with incomparabilities and relational belief revision.Sten Lindström & Wlodek Rabinowicz - 1991 - In André Fuhrmann & Michael Morreau (eds.), The Logic of Theory Change. Springer. pp. 93--126.
    In earlier papers (Lindström & Rabinowicz, 1989. 1990), we proposed a generalization of the AGM approach to belief revision. Our proposal was to view belief revision as a relation rather thanas a function on theories (or belief sets). The idea was to allow for there being several equally reasonable revisions of a theory with a given proposition. In the present paper, we show that the relational approach is the natural result of generalizing in a certain way an approach to belief (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   48 citations  
  15. Comparing Incomparability: The Functional Distinction between Operation and Identity.T. G. K. Meitz - 2012 - Constructivist Foundations 8 (1):76-78.
    Open peer commentary on the article “Making Sense and Meaning: On the Role of Communication and Culture in the Reproduction of Social Systems” by Raivo Palmaru. Upshot: The author addresses implications arising from socializing observer-dependent heuristics. Above all, Palmaru’s terminology is called into question since its conceptual deficiencies with regard to the relation between an observing system and its environments cause naturalistic fallacy. The author’s reply espouses a concise reanalysis of the complementary relations of fundamentally incomparable domains, namely the observer (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  16. Incommensurability, Incomparability, and God’s Choice of a World.Klaas J. Kraay - 2011 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 69 (2):91 - 102.
    Anselmian theism holds that there necessarily exists a being, God, who is essentially unsurpassable in power, knowledge, goodness, and wisdom. This being is also understood to be the creator and sustainer of all that is. In contemporary analytic philosophy of religion, this role is generally understood as follows: God surveys the array of possible worlds, and in his wisdom selects exactly one for actualization, based on its axiological properties. In this paper, I discuss an under-appreciated challenge for this account of (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  17.  16
    Incomparable ω 1 ‐like models of set theory.Gunter Fuchs, Victoria Gitman & Joel David Hamkins - 2017 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 63 (1-2):66-76.
    We show that the analogues of the embedding theorems of [3], proved for the countable models of set theory, do not hold when extended to the uncountable realm of ω1‐like models of set theory. Specifically, under the ⋄ hypothesis and suitable consistency assumptions, we show that there is a family of many ω1‐like models of, all with the same ordinals, that are pairwise incomparable under embeddability; there can be a transitive ω1‐like model of that does not embed into its own (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  18. Generic incomparability of infinite-dimensional entangled states.P. R. Holland - unknown
    In support of a recent conjecture by Nielsen (1999), we prove that the phenomena of ‘incomparable entanglement’— whereby, neither member of a pair of pure entangled states can be transformed into the other via local operations and classical communication (LOCC)—is a generic feature when the states at issue live in an infinite-dimensional Hilbert space.  2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  19.  31
    Incomparable treeable equivalence relations.Benjamin Miller - 2012 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 12 (1):1250004-.
    We establish Hjorth's theorem that there is a family of continuum-many pairwise strongly incomparable free actions of free groups, and therefore a family of continuum-many pairwise incomparable treeable equivalence relations.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  20. Incomparability in Epistemology.Mark Emerson Wunderlich - 2001 - Dissertation, The University of Arizona
    Epistemologists are interested in what makes beliefs well justified. Even before considering competing theories of epistemic justification, however, we should ask what sort of valuational structure we are trying to explain. If, as far as epistemic justification is concerned, beliefs are like bank accounts, then all beliefs are comparable: just as in any bank account there must be more, less, or as much money as in any other, one belief must be better, worse, or as good as any other. Contemporary (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  21.  8
    Incomparable Vγ$V_\gamma$‐degrees.Teng Zhang - 2023 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 69 (1):58-62.
    In [3], Shi proved that there exist incomparable Zermelo degrees at γ if there exists an ω‐sequence of measurable cardinals, whose limit is γ. He asked whether there is a size antichain of Zermelo degrees. We consider this question for the ‐degree structure. We use a kind of Prikry‐type forcing to show that if there is an ω‐sequence of measurable cardinals, then there are ‐many pairwise incomparable ‐degrees, where γ is the limit of the ω‐sequence of measurable cardinals.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  22.  9
    Theories Incomparable with Respect to Relative Interpretability.Richard Montague - 1971 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 36 (4):688-688.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  23. Incommensurability (and incomparability).Ruth Chang - 2013 - In Hugh LaFollette (ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Ethics. Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell. pp. 2591-2604.
    This encyclopedia entry urges what it takes to be correctives to common (mis)understandings concerning the phenomenon of incommensurability and incomparability and briefly outlines some of their philosophical upshots.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   19 citations  
  24.  18
    Incomparability and the huge-improvement arguments.Chrisoula Andreou - 2021 - American Philosophical Quarterly 58 (4):307-318.
    This paper explores the possibility of incomparability. It first focuses on a challenge to the small-improvement argument for incomparability and then turns to some seemingly more promising, “huge-improvement” variations on the argument. After considering an important complication, it is argued that, whether or not options can be strictly incomparable, there is room for cases beyond not just classic cases of trichotomous comparability but even beyond cases involving options that, though not trichotomously comparable, are still comparable as both positive, (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  25.  11
    Incomparability in local structures of s -degrees and Q -degrees.Irakli Chitaia, Keng Meng Ng, Andrea Sorbi & Yue Yang - 2020 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 59 (7-8):777-791.
    We show that for every intermediate \ s-degree there exists an incomparable \ s-degree. As a consequence, for every intermediate \ Q-degree there exists an incomparable \ Q-degree. We also show how these results can be applied to provide proofs or new proofs of upper density results in local structures of s-degrees and Q-degrees.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  26.  84
    Incommensurability, incomparability, and rational world-choice.Myron Arthur Penner - 2014 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 75 (1):13-25.
    Klaas J. Kraay argues that the rational choice model for divine creation—according to which God chooses to actualize one world among possible alternatives based on its axiological properties—cannot succeed given failures of comparability across possible worlds. I argue that failure of comparability across worlds would not undermine the rationality of choosing one world to create among possible alternatives.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  27.  9
    Incomparable risks, values and preferences.Nicolas Espinoza - 2006 - Dissertation, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm
    . Consistent valuation and societal prioritization of risks presupposes comparability among risks, that is, in order to rank risks in order of severity, and allocate risk preventative resources accordingly, we must be able to determine whether one risk is better or worse than another, and by how much. It is often claimed, however, that some risks are not amenable to this kind of comparison because they are incommensurable, which roughly means that they are not comparable with respect to a common (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  28.  31
    Incommensurability, incomparability, and God’s choice of a world.Klaas J. Kraay - 2011 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 69 (2):91-102.
    Anselmian theism holds that there necessarily exists a being, God, who is essentially unsurpassable in power, knowledge, goodness, and wisdom. This being is also understood to be the creator and sustainer of all that is. In contemporary analytic philosophy of religion, this role is generally understood as follows: God surveys the array of possible worlds, and in his wisdom selects exactly one for actualization, based on its axiological properties. In this paper, I discuss an under-appreciated challenge for this account of (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  29. Generic incomparability of infinite-dimensional entangled states.Christian Wüthrich, Rob Clifton & Brian Hepburn - 2002 - Physics Letters A 303:121-124.
    In support of a recent conjecture by Nielsen (1999), we prove that the phenomena of ‘incomparable entanglement’— whereby, neither member of a pair of pure entangled states can be transformed into the other via local operations and classical communication (LOCC)—is a generic feature when the states at issue live in an infinite-dimensional Hilbert space.  2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  30. Moral Dilemmas and Incomparability.Walter Sinnott-Armstrong - 1985 - American Philosophical Quarterly 22 (4):321 - 329.
    The author defines moral dilemmas as situations where there is a moral requirement for an agent to adopt each of two alternatives, And the agent cannot adopt both, But neither moral requirement overrides the other. The author then argues that moral dilemmas are possible because conflicting moral requirements can be either symmetrical or incomparable in a way that is limited enough to be plausible but still strong enough to yield moral dilemmas.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   34 citations  
  31.  40
    Maximization, Incomparability, and Managerial Choice.Nien-hê Hsieh - 2007 - Business Ethics Quarterly 17 (3):497-513.
    According to one prominent view of rationality, for the choice of alternative to be justified, it must be at least as good as other alternatives. Michael Jensen has recently invoked this view to argue that managers should act exclusively to maximize the long-run market value of economic enterprises. According to Jensen, alternative accounts of managerial responsibility, such as stakeholder theory, are to be rejected because they lack a single measure to compare alternatives as better or worse. Against Jensen’s account, this (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  32. Equality, clumpiness and incomparability.Nien-hê Hsieh - 2005 - Utilitas 17 (2):180-204.
    The incomparability of two items is thought to pose a problem for making justified choices and for consequentialist theories that rely on comparing states of the world to judge the goodness of a particular course of action. In response, it has been argued that items thought incomparable by one of the three standard relations, ‘better than’, ‘worse than’ and ‘equally good’, are instead comparable by some fourth relation, such as ‘roughly equal’ or ‘on a par’. Against such accounts, this (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   29 citations  
  33. On the Treatment of Incomparability in Ordering Semantics and Premise Semantics.Eric Swanson - 2011 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 40 (6):693-713.
    In his original semantics for counterfactuals, David Lewis presupposed that the ordering of worlds relevant to the evaluation of a counterfactual admitted no incomparability between worlds. He later came to abandon this assumption. But the approach to incomparability he endorsed makes counterintuitive predictions about a class of examples circumscribed in this paper. The same underlying problem is present in the theories of modals and conditionals developed by Bas van Fraassen, Frank Veltman, and Angelika Kratzer. I show how to (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  34.  15
    : The Incomparable Monsignor: Francesco Bianchini’s World of Science, History, and Court Intrigue.Elena Taddei - 2024 - Isis 115 (1):182-183.
  35.  24
    That Incomparable Poem the 'Ille Ego'?E. J. Kenney - 1970 - The Classical Review 20 (03):290-.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  36.  26
    Reconstructing an incomparable organism: the Chalicothere in nineteenth and early-twentieth century palaeontology.Chris Manias - 2018 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 40 (1):22.
    Palaeontology developed as a field dependent upon comparison. Not only did reconstructing the fragmentary records of fossil organisms and placing them within taxonomic systems and evolutionary lineages require detailed anatomical comparisons with living and fossil animals, but the field also required thinking in terms of behavioural, biological and ecological analogies with modern organisms to understand how prehistoric animals lived and behaved. Yet palaeontological material often worked against making easy linkages, bringing a sense of mystery and doubt. This paper will look (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  37. Incompatible And Incomparable Perfections: A New Argument Against Perfect Being Theism.Jashiel Resto Quiñones - 2024 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion:1-19.
    Perfect being theism is the view that the perfect being exists and the property being-perfect is the property being-God. According to the strong analysis of perfection, a being is perfect just in case it exemplifies all perfections. On the other hand, the weak analysis of perfection claims that a being is perfect just in case it exemplifies the best possible combination of compatible perfections. Strong perfect being theism accepts the former analysis while weak perfect being theism accepts the latter. In (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  38. Incommensurability, incomparability, Irrationality.Vasso Kindi - 1994 - Methodology and Science 27:41-55.
  39.  49
    Incomparable Worth, Steven E. Rhoads. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993, 334 + xi pages.J. Donald Moon - 1994 - Economics and Philosophy 10 (1):133.
  40.  34
    Comparing incomparable Kleene degrees.Philip Welch - 1985 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 50 (1):55-58.
  41. Incommensurability, incomparability, and practical reason, Ruth Chang (ed.), Harvard university press, 1998, 303 pages. [REVIEW]Adam Morton - 2000 - Economics and Philosophy 16 (1):147-174.
    review of Ruth Chang's collection in which I argue that the apparent agreements between the authors disguise underlying important differences.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  42.  7
    Psychoanalysis Comparable and Incomparable: The Evolution of a Method to Describe and Compare Psychoanalytic Approaches.David Tuckett - 2008 - Routledge.
    How do we know when what is happening between two people should be called psychoanalysis? What is a psychoanalytic process and how do we know when one is taking place? _Psychoanalysis Comparable and Incomparable_ describes the rationale and ongoing development of a six year programme of highly original meetings conducted by the European Psychoanalytic Federation Working Party on Comparative Clinical Methods. The project comprises over seventy cases discussed by more than five hundred experienced psychoanalysts over the course of sixty workshops. (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  43.  21
    Incommensurables and Incomparables: On the Conceptual Status and the Philosophical Use of Hyperreal Numbers.Michael White - 1999 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 40 (3):420-446.
    After briefly considering the ancient Greek and nineteenth-century history of incommensurables (magnitudes that do not have a common aliquot part) and incomparables (magnitudes such that the larger can never be surpassed by any finite number of additions of the smaller to itself), this paper undertakes two tasks. The first task is to consider whether the numerical accommodation of incommensurables by means of the extension of the ordered field of rational numbers to the field of reals is `similar' or analogous to (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  44. Comparing the incomparable: trade-offs and sacrifices.Steven Lukes - 1997 - In Ruth Chang (ed.), Incommensurability, incomparability, and practical reason. Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard. pp. 184--195.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   23 citations  
  45.  9
    Moral Dilemmas and Incomparability.Walter Sinnott-Armstrong - 1985 - American Philosophical Quarterly 22 (4):321-329.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations  
  46.  41
    Measure-theoretic construction of incomparable hyperdegrees.Clifford Spector - 1958 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 23 (3):280-288.
  47. Are hard choices cases of incomparability?Ruth Chang - 2012 - Philosophical Issues 22 (1):106-126.
    This paper presents an argument against the widespread view that ‘hard choices’ are hard because of the incomparability of the alternatives. The argument has two parts. First, I argue that any plausible theory of practical reason must be ‘comparativist’ in form, that is, it must hold that a comparative relation between the alternatives with respect to what matters in the choice determines a justified choice in that situation. If comparativist views of practical reason are correct, however, the incomparabilist view (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   32 citations  
  48. The Case for Incomparability.Benjamin Eva - manuscript
    According to influential arguments from several branches of philosophy, there exist some gradable natural language expressions that violate the following principle: if x and y are both F to some degree, then either x is at least as F as y or y is at least as F as x. Dorr, Nebel and Zuehl (2022) (DNZ), who refer to this principle as ‘Comparability’, respond to these arguments and offer a systematic case in support of Comparability. In this paper, I respond (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  49.  5
    Lady Ranelagh: the incomparable life of Robert Boyle’s sister.Carol Pal - forthcoming - Annals of Science.
    For almost 400 years, it has been a struggle to find the right words to describe Katherine Jones, Lady Ranelagh. When she died in 1691, followed a week later by her youngest brother, Sir Robert Boy...
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  50. Twenty-Five Years of Incomparable Research.Financial Performance Debate - forthcoming - Business and Society.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
1 — 50 / 510