Results for 'free recall of responses following paired-associate learning, degree of stimulus imagery'

994 found
Order:
  1.  6
    Manipulated retrievability in free recall.Robert K. Young & A. Keith Barton - 1972 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 93 (1):143.
  2.  18
    Stimulus recall following paired-associate learning.Samuel M. Feldman & Benton J. Underwood - 1957 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 53 (1):11.
  3.  16
    Differential recall of stimuli and responses following paired-associate learning.Sandra S. Merryman & Coleman T. Merryman - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 77 (2):345.
  4.  14
    Stimulus-recognition and response-recall dependency in paired-associate learning.Mary E. Grunke & James V. Hinrichs - 1975 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 5 (6):453-455.
  5.  20
    Total time and stimulus-response imagery in paired-associate learning.John H. Mueller & Frank L. Slaymaker - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 85 (2):288.
  6.  11
    Effect of stimulus-response meaningfulness on paired-associate learning and retention.V. K. Kothurkar - 1963 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 65 (3):305.
  7.  13
    Meaningfulness and articulation of stimulus and response in paired-associate learning and recall.Raymond G. Hunt - 1959 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 57 (4):262.
  8.  12
    Clustering in free recall following paired-associate learning.Peggy A. Runquist - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 83 (2p1):260.
  9.  15
    Percentage of occurrence of stimulus members and meaningfulness as related to forward and backward recall of paired associates.L. R. Goulet & Robert L. Solso - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 71 (4):494.
  10.  14
    Paired-associate learning as a function of similarity: Common stimulus and response items within the list.Takao Umemoto & Ernest R. Hilgard - 1961 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 62 (2):97.
  11.  13
    Erratum to: The effects of natural language mediation on response recognition following paired-associate learning.Philip H. Marshall, Douglas C. Chatfield & Erwin J. Janek - 1975 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 6 (6):644-644.
  12.  14
    The effects of natural language mediation on response recognition following paired-associate learning.Philip H. Marshall, Douglas C. Chatfield & Erwin J. Janek - 1975 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 5 (5):411-412.
  13.  15
    Supplementary Report: Recognition responses to ambiguous cues following paired-associate learning.Arnold Binder - 1961 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 61 (3):263.
  14.  23
    Tachistoscopic recognition thresholds, paired-associate learning, and free recall as a function of abstractness-concreteness and word frequency.Wilma A. Winnick & Kenneth Kressel - 1965 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 70 (2):163.
  15.  19
    The interaction of ability and amount of practice with stimulus and response meaningfulness (m, m') in paired-associate learning.Victor J. Cieutat, Fredric E. Stockwell & Clyde E. Noble - 1958 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 56 (3):193.
  16.  9
    Imagery effects in continuous paired-associate learning.Edward J. Rowe & Shannon K. Smith - 1973 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 99 (2):290.
  17.  7
    Supplementary Report: Stimulus and response meaningfulness (ḿ) in paired-associate learning by hospitalized mental patients.Victor J. Cieutat - 1959 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 58 (6):490.
  18.  26
    Acquired pleasantness as a stimulus and a response variable in paired-associate learning.Albert Silverstein - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 102 (3):534.
  19.  12
    Paired-associate learning when the same items occur as stimuli and responses.Robert K. Young - 1961 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 61 (4):315.
  20.  26
    Effect of amount of prior free recall learning on paired-associate transfer.James L. Rogers & William F. Battig - 1972 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 92 (3):373.
  21.  23
    Effects of word frequency and acoustic similarity on free-recall and paired-associate-recognition learning.Stephen W. Holborn, Karen L. Gross & Pamela A. Catlin - 1973 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 101 (1):169.
  22.  12
    Effect of variation in associative frequency of stimulus and response members on paired-associate learning.George Mandler & Enid H. Campbell - 1957 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 54 (4):269.
  23.  18
    Temporal variables in paired-associates learning: The roles of repetition and number tracking during stimulus intervals.Calvin F. Nodine, Barbara F. Nodine & Rex C. Thomas - 1967 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 73 (3):439.
  24.  22
    Prerecall and postrecall imagery ratings with pictorial and verbal stimuli in paired-associate learning.Frank W. Wicker & Carolyn M. Evertson - 1972 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 92 (1):75.
  25.  13
    Effects of associative reaction time and spaced presentations of stimulus-test items, response-test items, and stimulus-response repetitions on retention in paired associate learning.Edward C. C. McAllister - 1976 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 7 (2):205-207.
  26.  21
    Transfer of implicit associative responses between free-recall learning and verbal discrimination learning tasks.Lawrence E. Cole & N. Jack Kanak - 1972 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 95 (1):110.
  27.  13
    Utilization of stimulus elements in paired-associate learning.Eugene A. Lovelace & Elliott M. Blass - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 76 (4p1):596.
  28.  12
    Differential effects of stimulus and response isolation in paired associate learning.Raymond L. Erickson - 1965 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 69 (3):317.
  29.  24
    Imagery, mediational instructions, and noun position in free recall of noun-verb pairs.Tec Gupton & Gerald Frincke - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 86 (3):461.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  30.  20
    Response latencies produced by massed and spaced learning of a paired-associates list.John Brown & M. Huda - 1961 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 61 (5):360.
  31.  24
    Transfer from free-recall to paired-associate learning.A. Keith Barton & Robert K. Young - 1972 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 95 (1):240.
  32.  7
    Paired-associate response latencies as a function of free association strength.S. I. Shapiro - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 77 (2):223.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  33.  13
    Effects of stimulus meaningfulness, method of presentation, and list design on the learning of paired associates.John H. Wright - 1967 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 73 (1):72.
  34.  15
    Whole-part transfer from paired-associate to free recall learning.Gordon Wood - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 82 (3):532.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  35.  38
    The locus of the retention differences associated with degree of hierarchical conceptual structure.Benton J. Underwood, John J. Shaughnessy & Joel Zimmerman - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 102 (5):850.
  36.  28
    An empirical analysis of free-recall to paired-associate transfer.A. Keith Barton - 1973 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 97 (1):79.
  37.  17
    Frustration phenomena in paired-associate learning.R. A. Champion, T. E. McCann & J. A. Ruffels - 1972 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 95 (1):123.
  38.  13
    Anxiety (drive) level and degree of competition in paired-associates learning.K. W. Spence, John Taylor & Rhoda Ketchel - 1956 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 52 (5):306.
  39.  35
    Latency of imaginal and verbal mediators as a function of stimulus and response concreteness-imagery.John C. Yuille & Allan Paivio - 1967 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 75 (4):540.
  40.  16
    Biologically primed acquisition of aversions and association of expected stimulus pairs: Two different forms of learning.Alfons Hamm - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (2):301-302.
    The present commentary emphasizes that the acquisition of fear always involves complex changes in several quasi-independent response systems. Stimulus-specific electrodermal response differentiation as well as the bias to overestimate the belongingness of certain stimulus pairs mainly indicates cognitive processes of selective orienting and attention. Emotion, however, also involves the activation of subcortical motivational circuits. Why certain stimuli acquire rapid access to these basic motivational systems is not explained by the expectancy bias model.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  41.  28
    Cued and uncued free recall of unrelated words following interpolated learning.David R. Basden - 1973 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 98 (2):429.
  42.  28
    Interaction of arousal and recall interval in nonsense syllable paired-associate learning.Lewis J. Kleinsmith & Stephen Kaplan - 1964 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 67 (2):124.
  43.  11
    Influence of pronounceability, articulation, and test mode on paired-associate learning by the study-recall procedure.Francis J. DiVesta & Gary M. Ingersoll - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 79 (1p1):104.
  44.  15
    Effects of component emphasis on stimulus selection in paired-associate learning.Allen L. Harrington - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 79 (3p1):412.
  45.  15
    Stimulus Selection and Meaningfulness in Paired-Associate Learning with Stimulus Items of High Formal Similarity.R. S. Lockhart - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 78 (2p1):242.
  46.  23
    Stimulus selection and meaningfulness at different stages of paired-associate learning.Franklin M. Berry, Charles E. Joubert & Alfred A. Baumeister - 1972 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 95 (1):189.
  47.  13
    Effects of blank versus noninformative feedback and "right" and "wrong" on response repetition in paired-associate learning.David Rimm, Ronald Roesch, Ronald Perry & Chris Peebles - 1971 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 88 (1):26.
  48.  17
    Stimulus selection and the redundant-trigram model of paired-associate learning.Franklin M. Berry, Edward M. Duncan & Steven R. Cole - 1974 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 3 (2):142-144.
  49.  15
    Comparison of anticipation and recall methods in paired-associate learning.Charles N. Cofer, Florence Diamond, Richard A. Olsen, Judith S. Stein & Howard Walker - 1967 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 75 (4):545.
  50.  11
    Effects of blank versus noninformative feedback and "right" and "wrong" on response repetition in paired-associate learning: A reanalysis and reinterpretation.Janet T. Spence - 1972 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 94 (2):146.
1 — 50 / 994