The purpose of this study is to examine the topic of older people in the world from the perspective of the Social Teaching of the Church. As explained in Christifideles Laici , the Catholic Church believes that the laity is summoned to pave the way for the arrival of God’s Kingdom, and people who are at an advanced age should still respond to God’s calling through their own unique way of contribution. In Familiaris Consortio it is emphasized that the Church (...) should help older people manifest their roles both in families and religious groups. Although it is mentioned in these two apostolic exhortations that older people are blessed with wisdom, it is not explained as they actually acquire such a blessing. In order to address this issue and elaborate on the meaning of older people’s wisdom, Grün’s theory on the nature of older people’s wisdom and where such a blessing comes from is made reference to in this study. Moreover, it is emphasized in the apostolic exhortation of Familiaris Consortio that older people are often marginalized in today’s industrialized and urbanized society and neglected in their families, while also enduring psychological and/or physical pain. Addressing this issue, the value of older people’s work and their unshirkable missions and duties are explained in the present study by examining the nature and value of man’s work as mentioned in Laborem Exercens . Sen’s “capability approach” is also utilized in the present study as a way to examine older people’s values and the deprivation of their capability, allowing an in-depth analysis of this topic. The findings of this study reveal that Grün’s theory of older people’s wisdom being shaped by their life-experiences is significantly complementary to the messages on older people in Christifideles Laici and Familiaris Consortio . While Sen’s capability approach does not offer a complete set of values or cultural system that solves this problem, the approach of “civilization of love” proposed in the Social Teaching of the Church is very useful in helping one contemplate on the problems faced by older people around the world. (shrink)

ObjectiveTo investigate the characteristics of response inhibition of overweight/obese people, using behavior experiments combine with neural electrophysiological technology and discussing the difference in impulse level between obesity/overweight and normal-weight people through EEG data, questionnaire, and behavior experiment.Method All participants completed the Go/Nogo task; meanwhile, behavior data and 64 channel EEG data were recorded. Participants completed the Stop-Signal task and behavior date was recorded.Results During Go/Nogo task, no significant differences were found in reaction time, omission errors of the Go task between (...) the two groups, while commission errors of the Nogo task of the control group were significantly greater than the overweight/obesity group. About SSRT during the Stop-Signal Task, the interaction of stimulus type and group was significant. No significant differences were found between the two groups in amplitude and latency of N2. About the amplitude of P3, the interaction of task type, electrode point, and groups were significant, the control group P3 amplitude was significantly greater than overweight/obesity group during the Nogo task. Regarding about latency of P3, the interaction of group and electrode point were not significant, but the main effect of task type was significant.Conclusion In terms of behavioral outcomes, overweight–obese subjects had lower dominant response inhibition and response cessation compared to normal-weight subjects. In terms of EEG results, overweight–obese subjects showed no difference in processing speed and level of conflict monitoring for early inhibitory processing compared to normal-weight subjects, but there was a deficit in behavioral control for late inhibitory processing. (shrink)

The articles in this collection were all selected from the first five volumes of the Journal of Dialectics of Nature published by the Chinese Academy of Sciences between 1979 and 1985. The Journal was established in 1979 as a comprehensive theoretical publication concerning the history, philosophy and sociology of the natural sciences. It began publication as a response to China's reform, particularly the policy of opening to the outside world. Chinese scholars began to undertake distinctive, original research in these fields. (...) This collection provides a cross-section of their efforts during the initial phase. To enable western scholars to understand the historical process of this change in Chinese academics, Yu Guangyuan's `On the Emancipation of the Mind' and Xu Liangying's `Essay on the Role of Science and Democracy in Society' have been included in this collection. Three of the papers included on the philosophy of science are discussions of philosophical issues in cosmology and biology by scientists themselves. The remaining four are written by philosophers of science and discuss information and cognition, homeostasis and Chinese traditional medicine, the I Ching (Yi Jing) and mathematics, etc. Papers have been selected on the history of both classical and modern science and technology, the most distinctive of which are macro-comparisons of the development of science in China and the west. Some papers discuss the issue of the demarcation of periods in the history of science, the history of ancient Chinese mathematics, astronomy, metallurgy, machinery, medicine, etc. Others discuss the history of modern physics and biology, the history of historiography of science in China and the history of regional development of Chinese science and technology. Also included are biographies of three post-eighteenth-century Chinese scholars, Li Shanlan (1811-1882), Hua Hengfang (1833–1902), and Cai Yuanpei (1868–1940), who contributed greatly to the introduction of western science and scholarship to China. In addition, three short papers have been included introducing the interactions between Chinese scholars and three great western scientists, Niels Bohr, Norbert Wiener, and Robert A. Millikan. (shrink)

本书是关于新意识形态批评的论文集,本书要论述的意图是:以理论与社会生活的密切关系而言,中国文论家可以创造出自己的“本位话语”,其具体问题集中为两个,即文化转型中的当代中国的精神建构和建立文学理论的本位 话语。.

本书从意识形态的概念、不同意识形态的内涵、意识形态与权力的获取、分配、消费等方面研究意识形态.

本书从唐君毅先生提出的“中国艺术精神”开始论述,分析了中国艺术精神的多层面向进而深入分析其阐释的意义;继而,本书对徐复观先生深入的研究进行了解读和探索,一直延续到今日学界的研究和探索,并对“中国艺术精 神”在世纪之交时发生的转向给出了结论.

本书从生态文艺的基本观念到历史扫描,进而比较宏观地把握中国美学中的生态思想及中国古代艺术中生态性体验的特点,并由此通过对中国古代美学与艺术的生态特点的认识,通过对其理论及审美转换性的把握而引申至现代, 着力挖掘其现代意义及价值。.

本书总体上对生态学马克思主义的定义域、逻辑前提、哲学方法论基础及其核心观点进行了分析。.

本书从多个不同的角度介绍和分析了20多位西方马克思主义者在意识形态方面的基本思想,揭示了意识形态和种类、存在形式、特征、功能等,对不同流派的意识形态理论进行了分类和归纳,梳理了各个思想家的意识形态理论 的脉络,全面展现西方马克思主义意识形态理论的复杂画卷。.

本書從多維度研究了國外意識形態新變化，即從傳統意識形態的新變化、當代新出現的意識形態、社會主義意識形態的新發展、蘇共意識形態的終結及其原因等維度，對當代國外意識形態從實踐到理論、從宏觀到微觀、從內容到 形式、從類型到結構、從特徵到功能、從存在方式到傳播方式、從形成機制到作用機制、從研究視角到研究方法等方面進行較全面的研究，分析了國外意識形態新變化對我國主流意識形態建設的影響、挑戰與啟迪，並對我國社會 主義意識形態建設策略提出建議。.

本书通过对马克思意识形态理论的创立过程的基本梳理、对马克思的意识形态理论基本观点的综合阐述以及对马克思意识形态批判的向度和问题域的初步探讨,对马克思意识形态理论做一基本理解,对其做出当代性的阐释。.

Detailed summary in vernacular field only.

本书以20世纪德国美学的重要理论为对象,对叔本华,尼采,弗洛伊德,克尔凯郭尔,海德格尔,马克思,本杰明,阿多诺等对20世纪西方文化产生重要影响的"美学思想家"的理论作了深入的意识形态剖析,对于深化意识 形态的批评方法,反思阿尔都塞学派研究思路的局限性,都作出了非常富于启发性的分析论证.

陈伟(1957- ),浙江宁波人,上海师范大学文学研究所从事文艺学、美学研究工作.

本書以習近平關於意識形態安全問題的一系列重要論述為指導，按照從一般到特殊、從理論到現實的邏輯脈絡，以理論闡述為基礎，以現實問題為參照，準確界定意識形態安全概念，重點把握國家意識形態安全風險演變特點，全 面分析互聯網時代影響中國意識形態安全的複雜因素，提出牢牢掌握互聯網時代維護中國意識形態安全戰略主動權的對策措施，試圖建構研究互聯網時代中國意識形態安全問題的完整理論框架，具有一定理論價值和現實意義。.