Background:Doctors should disclose the diagnosis to patients according to the principle of autonomy. However, not disclosing the diagnosis and prognosis to cancer patients remains common in mainland China.Objective:The study explored the experiences and attitudes of patients with cancer, family members, and the medical staff in truth-telling.Research design:A quantitative survey with three closed-ended questionnaires was conducted.Participants:In all, 137 patients with cancer, 134 family members caring for cancer cases, and 54 medical staff were surveyed. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize all characteristics, (...) and the chi-square test was performed to analyze group differences in attitudes toward cancer disclosure.Ethical considerations:This study was approved by the Committee on Ethics of Biomedicine Research, at the Second Military Medical University (HJEC-2018-YF-001). Informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to study commencement.Findings:A total of 59.8% of patients were informed about their diagnosis within 1 week, and 19.7% inferred theirs. The medical staff preferred to prioritize family members in informing about patient diagnosis while 77.4% of patients preferred to be told the whole truth at the time of initial diagnosis. More patients than family members and medical staff wanted the patients to be informed about the diagnosis ( p < 0.001). A significant difference was found between the patients and family members regarding who should tell the patients.Discussion:The willingness of patients in knowing the truth was underestimated by their family members as well as the medical staff. Guessing the truth indirectly may exert negative effects on the patients, and not telling the truth is inappropriate in patients who want to be informed.Conclusion:Disclosure of a cancer diagnosis is a complex process involving medical practice, as well as a range of cultural, ethical, and legal factors. The medical staff should first assess each patient’s willingness in truth-telling and inform about disease diagnosis with respect. Emotional support and comfort from family members are encouraged. Anyone in the patient’s care team, especially nurses, could be integrated in the process of truth-telling. (shrink)

本书内容包括:导言、生态学,生态思想和道教生态思想、道教生态思想的原生性、道教生态宇宙观等。.

本书共辑道教格言1800余条,以《道藏》内外的道家和道教的经籍为主,将其中的格言名句之精华进行分类归纳,并加以简明注解。.

本书通过分析陈景元生平,著作及所处时代背景,阐述了陈景元思想中三教融通的特点,并从道论,性命理论,修道治国等方面分析了陈景元思想与三教关系.

本书以道教神仙思想的演变为中心, 发掘不同时期相对突出的道教社会伦理思想, 回答了道教在面对世俗社会时有什么样的伦理思考和规范, 旨在对道教深层价值作重新认识和评价, 向人们展示一种更全面的道教.本书结合时代, 融入了当今时代理念, 更具有现代意义.

本书收录《基督教与道教比较论纲》、《天主教成圣观的天人合一幅度》、《论早期基督宗教的性爱伦理观》等20篇论文。.

Ben shu yi dong zhong shu zi ran guan wei shi jiao,Chan shu le dong zhong shu de"tian ren gan ying"lun,"wu lei lei bi"he"xun ming de li"de fang fa lun,Yi tian wei yuan ben de yu zhou lun,"bian er you chang"de bian zheng tian dao guan,Yi ji dong zhong shu you guan yuan qi,Yin yang,Wu xing de zi ran ke xue si xiang,Zai zong ti shang ken ding le dong zhong shu zai jie shi he ren shi zi ran (...) gui lü shang de jin bu xing,Ken ding le dong zhong shu dui zhong guo gu dai zi ran ke xue de gong xian,Bing pi ping le yi wang dui dong zhong shu bu gong zheng di ping pan.Ben shu tong shi ye zhi chu le dong zhong shu de mou xie si xiang dui hou shi de fu mian ying xiang. (shrink)

本书内容包括:教育的实证研究、历史的比较的教育研究、教育行动研究、马克思主义教育文献研究、“元教育学”研究.

本书围绕四大主题展开:以天人之际为真奠立终极依据,以人性善恶为其提供德性凭借,以内圣外王描摹政治思想,以德主刑辅作为制度精神。从而,在伦理政治理论上,形成了一个完整体系的雏形。.

Ben shu li zu yu si xiang zheng zhi jiao yu de xue ke shi jiao, ba xian Qin ru jia jiao hua si xiang shi wei yi ge guo cheng he xi tong, jiang yi ge xiang dui wan zheng de, xi tong de xian Qin ru jia "jiao hua" si xiang li ti shi de cheng xian chu lai; bing li zu yu dang dai she hui de xian dai xing jiao hua kun (...) jing wen ti, ji ji cong xian Qin ru jia jiao hua si xiang zhe yi "chuan tong" zhong xun qiu jie jue zhi dao, li tu chan fa xian Qin ru jia jiao hua si xiang de dang dai zhuan hua wen ti. (shrink)

本书内容包括:比例原则之界定,比例原则的回溯与前瞻,比例原则的理论基础,比例原则的功能与局限,比例原则于我国公法中适用的若干探讨.

魏晋时期玄学、佛教盛行，但是以儒家思想作为治国理念的价值观依然占据重要地位。以往学术界对魏晋南北朝时期的政治、经济、社会、思想文化与民族关系等的研究较多，而对儒家教化涉及较少；本书在吸收前人研究成果的 基础上，对魏晋时期的儒家教化做了比较全面系统的深入考察，弥补了以往研究的不足，也是对以往研究的重要推进，具有重要的学术意义。.