60 found
Order:
Disambiguations
William A. Rottschaefer [58]William Andrew Rottschaefer [3]
  1.  22
    The Biology and Psychology of Moral Agency.William Andrew Rottschaefer - 1997 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
    This important book brings findings and theories in biology and psychology to bear on the fundamental question in ethics of what it means to behave morally. It explains how we acquire and put to work our capacities to act morally and how these capacities are reliable means to achieving true moral beliefs, proper moral motivations, and successful moral actions. By presenting a complete model of moral agency based on contemporary evolutionary theory, developmental biology and psychology, and social cognitive theory, the (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  2.  95
    Why Wilfrid Sellars Is Right (and Right-Wing).William A. Rottschaefer - 2011 - Journal of Philosophical Research 36:291-325.
    Scholars of Wilfrid Sellars’s thought split into Right- and Left-wing Sellarsians. Right-wing Sellarsians urge Sellars’s scientific realism and the prominence of the scientific image of man in the synoptic vision. Left-wing Sellarsians emphasize the prominence of the logical space of reasons over that of causes, rejecting Sellars’s scientism. In his recent book James O’Shea attempts to reconcile these Sellarsian images, arguing that one best understands the Sellarsian synoptic image in terms of a norm/nature meta-principle that endorses the conceptual irreducibility and (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  3.  48
    Affording Affordance Moral Realism.William A. Rottschaefer - 2020 - Biological Theory 16 (1):30-48.
    In this article I elaborate a scientifically based moral realism that I call affordance moral realism, and I offer a promissory note that affordance moral realism is the best current explanation of morality. Affordance moral realism maintains that morality is constituted by the interaction of moral agents and moral affordances. The latter are the natural and social environments in which moral agents’ activities take place and contain the objects of moral agents’ activities whose actualizations are the manifestation of substantive moral (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  4.  64
    Naturalizing Ethics: the Biology and Psychology of Moral Agency.William A. Rottschaefer - 2000 - Zygon 35 (2):253-286.
    Moral agency is a central feature of both religious and secular conceptions of human beings. In this paper I outline a scientific naturalistic model of moral agency making use of current findings and theories in sociobiology,developmental psychology, and social cognitive theory. The model provides answers to four central questions about moral agency: what it is, how it is acquired, how it is put to work, and how it is justified. I suggest that this model can provide religious and secular moral (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  5.  48
    Moral Learning and Moral Realism: How Empirical Psychology Illuminates Issues in Moral Ontology.William A. Rottschaefer - 1999 - Behavior and Philosophy 27 (1):19 - 49.
    Although scientific naturalistic philosophers have been concerned with the role of scientific psychology in illuminating problems in moral psychology, they have paid less attention to the contributions that it might make to issues of moral ontology. In this paper, I illustrate how findings in moral developmental psychology illuminate and advance the discussion of a long-standing issue in moral ontology, that of moral realism. To do this, I examine Gilbert Harman and Nicholas Sturgeon's discussion of that issue. I contend that their (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  6.  40
    Social Learning Theories of Moral Agency.William A. Rottschaefer - 1991 - Behavior and Philosophy 19 (1):61 - 76.
    An important question for a naturalized philosophical psychology is what constitutes moral agency (MA). The two prominent scientific theories to which such a philosophical approach might appeal, those of cognitive developmental theory (CDT) and social learning theory (SLT), currently face an investigative dilemma: The better theories of the acquisition of beliefs and the performance of action based on them, the SLTs, seem to be irrelevant to the phenomenon of MA and the theories that seem to be relevant, the CDTs, are (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  7.  57
    Assessing the Role of Non-Epistemic Feminist Values in Scientific Inquiry.William A. Rottschaefer - 2003 - Behavior and Philosophy 31:225 - 249.
    In this paper I examine the feminist claim that non-epistemic values ought to play a role in scientific inquiry. I examine four holist arguments that non-epistemic values ought to play a role not only in the external aspects of scientific inquiry such as problem selection and the ethics of experimentation but also in its internal aspects, those that have to do with epistemic justification. In supporting their conclusion, I argue that they establish that the traditional external/internal distinction has served as (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  8.  42
    Ordinary Knowledge and Scientific Realism.William A. Rottschaefer - 1978 - In Joseph C. Pitt (ed.), The Philosophy of Wilfrid Sellars: Queries and Extensions: Papers Deriving from and Related to a Workshop on the Philosophy of Wilfrid Sellars held at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University 1976. D. Reidel. pp. 135--161.
  9.  53
    Psychological foundations of value theory: B. F. skinners science of values.William A. Rottschaefer - 1982 - Zygon 17 (3):293-301.
    Abstract.The thesis that the sciences are value neutral has recently been criticized severely. However, both the critics of the value‐neutrality thesis and its upholders share the separatist position that there is a fundamental dichotomy between fact and value, differing only on the degree to which science is impregnated with values. Skinner's claim that the science of operant behavior is the science of values rejects this dichotomy and is opposed to both the value‐neutrality thesis and criticisms of it. I examine Skinner's (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  10.  60
    Verbal behaviorism and theoretical mentalism: An assessment of Marras-Sellars dialogue.William A. Rottschaefer - 1983 - Philosophy Research Archives 9:511-534.
    Sellars’ verbal behaviorism demands that linguistic episodes be conceptual in an underivative sense and his theoretical mentalism that thoughts as postulated theoretical entities be modelled on linguistic behaviors. Marras has contended that Sellars’ own methodology requires that semantic categories be theoretical. Thus linguistic behaviors can be conceptual in only a derivative sense. Further he claims that overt linguistic behaviors cannot serve as a model for all thought because thought is primarily symbolic. I support verbal behaviorism by showing that semantic categories (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  11. Observation.William A. Rottschaefer - 1976 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 14 (4):499-509.
  12. John Leslie, Universes Reviewed by.William A. Rottschaefer - 1991 - Philosophy in Review 11 (3):204-207.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  13. Robert Richards, Darwin and the Emergence of Evolutionary Theories of Mind and Behavior Reviewed by.William A. Rottschaefer - 1988 - Philosophy in Review 8 (7):285-287.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  14. How to Make Naturalism Safe for Supernaturalism: An Evaluation of Willem Drees's Supernaturalistic Naturalism.William A. Rottschaefer - 2001 - Zygon 36 (3):407-453.
    Naturalism is often considered to be antithetical to theology and genuine religion. However, in a series of recent books and articles, Willem Drees has proposed a scientifically informed naturalistic account of religion, which, he contends, is not only compatible with supernaturalistic religion and theology but provides a better account of both than either purely naturalistic or purely supernaturalistic accounts. While rejecting both epistemological and methodological naturalism, Drees maintains that ontological naturalism offers the best philosophical account of the natural world and (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  15. Willard A. Young, Fallacies of Creationism Reviewed by.William A. Rottschaefer - 1986 - Philosophy in Review 6 (8):411-412.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  16.  19
    Adaptational functional ascriptions in evolutionary biology: A critique of Schaffner's views.William A. Rottschaefer - 1997 - Philosophy of Science 64 (4):698-713.
    Kenneth Schaffner has argued that evolutionary theory, strictly understood, cannot support the functional ascriptions used in adaptational functional explanations. Although the causal ascription clause in these ascriptions is supported, the goal-ascription clause cannot be, since it imports anthropocentric features deriving from a vulgar understanding of evolutionary theory. I argue that an etiological interpretation of selectional explanations sanctions both the causal and goal-ascription clauses of functional ascriptions and provides a way to understand teleological explanation within evolutionary biology.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  17.  65
    Is the science of positive intentional change a science of objective moral values?William Andrew Rottschaefer - 2014 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 37 (4):435-436.
    I examine whether Wilson et al.'s argument for a science of positive intentional change constitutes an argument for a science of objective moral values. Drawing from their discussion, I present four reasons for thinking that it may be and some considerations on why it may not be. Concluding, I seek help from the authors. [Open Peer Commentary on a BBS article.].
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  18.  50
    Philosophical and religious implications of cognitive social learning theories of personality.William A. Rottschaefer - 1991 - Zygon 26 (1):137-148.
    This paper sketches an alternative answer to James Jones's recent attempt to explore the implications of cognitive social learning theories of personality for issues in epistemology, philosophy of science, and religious studies. Since the 1960s, two cognitive revolutions have taken place in scientific psychology: the first made cognition central to theories of perception, memory, problem solving, and so on; the second made cognition central to theories of learning and behavior, among others. Cognitive social learning theories find their place in the (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  19. Skinner's science of value.William A. Rottschaefer - 1980 - Behaviorism 8 (2):99-112.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  20. David L. Hull, The Metaphysics of Evolution Reviewed by.William A. Rottschaefer - 1990 - Philosophy in Review 10 (8):319-321.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  21. What can history tell us about founding ethics on biology?William A. Rottschaefer - 2001 - Biology and Philosophy 16 (1):131-144.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  22. Biology and philosophy in fruitful.William A. Rottschaefer - 1985 - Behaviorism 13 (2):187-190.
  23. Operant Learning and the Scientific and Philosophical Foundations of Behavior Therapy.William A. Rottschaefer - 1983 - Behaviorism 11 (2):155-161.
    The continuing and expanding successes of behavior therapy in the treatment of psychological problems raise important questions about their scientific and philosophical bases. In this paper I examine the claims of Edward Erwin that behaviorism cannot provide an adequate philosophical basis for behavior therapy, contemporary learning theories which exclude cognitive factors as causes of behavior cannot provide an adequate empirical basis for behavior therapy; and learning theories have played only a heuristic role in the development of behavior therapy. And I (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  24.  46
    The Image of God of Neurotheology: Reflections of Culturally Based Religious Commitments or Evolutionarily Based Neuroscientific Theories?William A. Rottschaefer - 1999 - Zygon 34 (1):57-65.
    In Augustinian fashion, James B. Ashbrook and Carol Rausch Albright develop a neurotheology that finds evolutionarily based correlations between the functions of the human mind‐brain and the roles God plays in human life. I argue that their assumptions of anthropomorphism, that the human mind‐brain must conceptualize its environment in human terms, and realism, that anthropomorphism is correct, are evolutionarily unlikely. I conclude that the image of God (imago dei) the authors find reflected in the human mind‐brain appears to derive from (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  25.  14
    Verbal Behaviorism and Theoretical Mentalism.William A. Rottschaefer - 1983 - Philosophy Research Archives 9:511-533.
    Sellars’ verbal behaviorism demands that linguistic episodes be conceptual in an underivative sense and his theoretical mentalism that thoughts as postulated theoretical entities be modelled on linguistic behaviors. Marras has contended that Sellars’ own methodology requires that semantic categories be theoretical. Thus linguistic behaviors can be conceptual in only a derivative sense. Further he claims that overt linguistic behaviors cannot serve as a model for all thought because thought is primarily symbolic. I support verbal behaviorism by showing that semantic categories (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  26.  49
    A Course in the History and Philosophy of Mathematics from a Naturalistic Perspective.William A. Rottschaefer - 1991 - Teaching Philosophy 14 (4):375-388.
    This article describes .a course in the philosophy of mathematics that compares various metaphysical and epistemological theories of mathematics with portions of the history of the development of mathematics, in particular, the history of calculus.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  27.  38
    Biological and Physicochemical Explanations in Experimental Biology.William A. Rottschaefer - 2008 - Biological Theory 3 (4):380-390.
  28.  16
    Believing Is Seeing — Sometimes.William A. Rottschaefer - 1975 - New Scholasticism 49 (4):503-509.
  29. Book reviews-the biology and psychology of moral agency.William A. Rottschaefer & Stefano Poggi - 2000 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 22 (3):445-445.
  30.  60
    B.f. Skinner and the grand inquisitor.William A. Rottschaefer - 1995 - Zygon 30 (3):407-433.
    B.F. Skinner allures us with the possibilities of turning the stones of materialistic rewards into the bread of human values. He tempts us by assuring success in achieving our goals through behavioral science, if only we give up our autonomy. He offers the power of complete control over our behaviors, on condition that we relinquish responsibility for our lives to a technological elite. Is B. F. Skinner a flesh‐and‐blood Grand Inquisitor? This essay tries to persuade the reader that Skinner's offers (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  31.  57
    Discerning the Limits of Religious Naturalism.William A. Rottschaefer - 2001 - Zygon 36 (3):467-475.
    In response to my “How to Make Naturalism Safe for Supernaturalism: An Evaluation of Willem Drees's Supernaturalistic Naturalism” (Rottschaefer 2001), Willem Drees maintains that I have misunderstood his purpose and views and have failed to make the case against his view that naturalism is intrinsically limited. In this response, I comment on these concerns.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  32.  43
    Gustafson's theocentrism and scientific naturalistic philosophy: A marriage made in heaven?William A. Rottschaefer - 1995 - Zygon 30 (2):211-220.
    Examining James M. Gustafson's views on the relationships between the sciences, theology, and ethics from a scientifically based naturalistic philosophical perspective, I concur with his rejection of separatist and antagonistic interactionist positions and his adherence to a mutually supportive interactionist position with both descriptive and normative features. I next explore three aspects of this interactionism: religious empiricism, the connections between facts and values, and the centering of objective values in the divine. Here I find much accord between Gustafson's theocentrism and (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  33.  43
    Moral Agency and Moral Learning: Transforming Metaethics from a First to a Second Philosophy Enterprise.William A. Rottschaefer - 2009 - Behavior and Philosophy 37:195 - 216.
    Arguably, one of the most exciting recent advances in moral philosophy is the ongoing scientific naturalization of normative ethics and metaethics, in particular moral psychology. A relatively neglected area in these improvements that is centrally important for developing a scientifically based naturalistic metaethics concerns the nature and acquisition of successful moral agency. In this paper I lay out two examples of how empirically based findings help us to understand and explain some cases of successful moral agency. These are research in (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  34.  21
    Moral Learning and Moral Realism.William A. Rottschaefer - 1998 - The Paideia Archive: Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 12:37-43.
    Although scientific naturalistic philosophers have been concerned with the role of scientific psychology in illuminating problems in moral psychology, they have paid less attention to the contributions that it might make to issues of moral ontology. In this paper, I illustrate how findings in moral developmental psychology illuminate and advance the discussion of a long-standing issue in moral ontology, that of moral realism. To do this, I examine Gilbert Harman and Nicholas Sturgeon's discussion of that issue. I contend that their (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  35.  47
    Mythic religious naturalism.William A. Rottschaefer - 2007 - Zygon 42 (2):369-408.
  36.  17
    No Messages Without a Sender.William A. Rottschaefer - 2001 - Philo 4 (1):38-53.
    In his recent Gifford Lectures, Holmes Rolston argues that the informational character of biological phenomena is better explained by a theistic God of the process variety than by appealing to naturalistic biological explanations. In this paper, I assess Rolston’s argument by examining current biological and philosophical interpretations of the role of the theoretical concept of information in the description and explanation of biological phenomena. I find that none of these understandings of the concept allow Rolston’s conclusion. Natural selection explanations are (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  37.  91
    Naturalizing or demythologizing scientific inquiry: Kitcher’s: Science, truth and democracy.William A. Rottschaefer - 2004 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 34 (3):408-422.
    , Philip Kitcher has argued that science ought to meet both the epistemic goals of significant truth and the nonepistemic goals of serving the interests of a democratic society. He opposes this science as servant model to both the theology of science as source of salvific truth and the theology of science as anti-Christ. In a recent critical comment, Paul A. Roth argues that Kitcher remains entangled in the theology of salvific truth, not realizing that its goal is either vacuous (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  38.  23
    Naturalizing Or Demythologizing Scientific Inquiry: Kitcher’s: Science, Truth and Democracy.William A. Rottschaefer - 2004 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 34 (3):408-422.
    In Science, Truth and Democracy, Philip Kitcher has argued that science ought to meet both the epistemic goals of significant truth and the nonepistemic goals of serving the interests of a democratic society. He opposes this science as servant model to both the theology of science as source of salvific truth and the theology of science as anti-Christ. In a recent critical comment, Paul A. Roth argues that Kitcher remains entangled in the theology of salvific truth, not realizing that its (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  39.  58
    Religious cognition as interpreted experience: An examination of Ian Barbour's comparison of the epistemic structures of science and religion.William A. Rottschaefer - 1985 - Zygon 20 (3):265-282.
    . Using as a model contemporary analyses of scientific cognition, Ian Harbour has claimed that religious cognition is neither immediate nor inferential but has the structure of interpreted experience. Although I contend that Barbour has failed to establish his claim, I believe his views about the similarities between scientific and religious cognition are well founded. Thus on that basis I offer an alternative proposal that theistic religious cognition is essentially inferential and that religious experience is in fact the use of (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  40.  45
    Religion's evolutionary landscape needs pruning with ockham's razor.William A. Rottschaefer - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (6):747-748.
    Atran & Norenzayan (A&N) have not adequately supported the epistemic component of their proposal, namely, that God does not exist. A weaker, more probable hypothesis, not requiring that component – that the benefits of religious belief outweigh those of disbelief, even though we do not know whether or not God exists – is available. I counsel them to use Ockham's razor, eliminate their negative epistemic thesis, and accept the weaker hypothesis.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  41.  52
    Singer, sociobiology, and values: Pure reason versus empirical reason.William A. Rottschaefer & David L. Martinsen - 1984 - Zygon 19 (2):159-170.
    E. O. Wilson argues that we must use scientifically based reason to solve the values dilemma created by the loss of a transcendent foundation for values. Peter Singer allows that sociobiology can help us understand the evolutionary origin of ethics, but denies the claim that sociobiology or any science can furnish us with ultimate ethical principles. We argue that Singer's critique of Wilson's attempt to bridge the gap between fact and value using empirical reason is unconvincing and that Singer's own (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  42. Skinner's Science of Value.William A. Rottschaefer - 1980 - Behavior and Philosophy 8 (2):99.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  43. The ghost of the given: A case for epistemological ghostbusters or ghostlovers.William A. Rottschaefer - 1989 - Bridges 1:59-81.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  44.  38
    The limitations of ethical theory.William A. Rottschaefer - 1983 - Zygon 18 (2):185-187.
  45.  62
    The Middle Does Not Hold.William A. Rottschaefer - 2011 - Journal of Philosophical Research 36:361-369.
    This paper continues the dialogue between my right-wing-Sellars and James O’Shea’s middle-Sellars. In it, I reply to O’Shea’s middle-Sellars critique of my right-wing-Sellarsian criticism of his recent attempt (Wilfrid Sellars: Wilfrid Sellars: Naturalism with a Normative Turn) to develop an understanding of Sellars’s overall view that avoids the problems of both right and left-wing-Sellarsians. In his contribution to this issue O’Shea argues that Sellars follows a middle way between left and right-wing-Sellarsians by advocating a refined Kantian naturalist account of human (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  46.  27
    Why Wilfrid Sellars Is Right (and Right-Wing).William A. Rottschaefer - 2011 - Journal of Philosophical Research 36:291-325.
    Scholars of Wilfrid Sellars’s thought split into Right- and Left-wing Sellarsians. Right-wing Sellarsians urge Sellars’s scientific realism and the prominence of the scientific image of man in the synoptic vision. Left-wing Sellarsians emphasize the prominence of the logical space of reasons over that of causes, rejecting Sellars’s scientism. In his recent book James O’Shea attempts to reconcile these Sellarsian images, arguing that one best understands the Sellarsian synoptic image in terms of a norm/nature meta-principle that endorses the conceptual irreducibility and (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  47.  37
    Wilfred Sellars and the Demise of the Manifest Image.William A. Rottschaefer - 1976 - Modern Schoolman 53 (4):398-404.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  48.  28
    Wilfrid Sellars and the Foundations of Normativity by Peter Ole.William A. Rottschaefer - 2017 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 55 (4):745-746.
    In this very informative volume, Peter Olen addresses questions that are of interest both to philosophers generally and to students of Sellars's thought in particular. Do philosophers have a job that is distinct from the scientists'? Yes. What is the nature of normativity and how is it discerned? Roughly, normativity is connected with the extra-conceptual content that normative language adds to factual content. Do Wilfrid Sellars's career-long efforts to account for the nature of both philosophy and normativity present itself as (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  49.  41
    Why Wilfrid Sellars Is Right (and Right-Wing).William A. Rottschaefer - 2011 - Journal of Philosophical Research 36:291-325.
    Scholars of Wilfrid Sellars’s thought split into Right- and Left-wing Sellarsians. Right-wing Sellarsians urge Sellars’s scientific realism and the prominence of the scientific image of man in the synoptic vision. Left-wing Sellarsians emphasize the prominence of the logical space of reasons over that of causes, rejecting Sellars’s scientism. In his recent book James O’Shea attempts to reconcile these Sellarsian images, arguing that one best understands the Sellarsian synoptic image in terms of a norm/nature meta-principle that endorses the conceptual irreducibility and (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  50. Really taking Darwin seriously: An alternative to Michael Ruse's Darwinian metaethics. [REVIEW]William A. Rottschaefer & David Martinsen - 1990 - Biology and Philosophy 5 (2):149-173.
    Michael Ruse has proposed in his recent book Taking Darwin Seriously and elsewhere a new Darwinian ethics distinct from traditional evolutionary ethics, one that avoids the latter's inadequate accounts of the nature of morality and its failed attempts to provide a naturalistic justification of morality. Ruse argues for a sociobiologically based account of moral sentiments, and an evolutionary based casual explanation of their function, rejecting the possibility of ultimate ethical justification. We find that Ruse's proposal distorts, overextends and weakens both (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   26 citations  
1 — 50 / 60