5 found
Order:
Disambiguations
Werner S. Pluhar [5]Werner Schrutka Pluhar [1]
  1.  29
    Critique of Judgment.Immanuel Kant & Werner S. Pluhar - 1941 - Indianapolis, Indiana: Hackett Publishing Company.
    This is Werner S. Pluhar's translation of Immanuel Kant's Critique of Judgment (Kritik der Urtheilskraft) for Hackett Publications (Indianapolis, Indiana). ISBN 9780872200258 (paperback).
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   184 citations  
  2. Kritik Der Reinen Vernunft.Immanuel Kant, Jens Timmermann, Werner S. Pluhar, Paul Guyer & Allen W. Wood - 1999 - Erkenntnis 51 (2-3):357-363.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   75 citations  
  3.  78
    Abortion and Simple Consciousness.Werner S. Pluhar - 1977 - Journal of Philosophy 74 (3):159-172.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  4.  31
    Nonnaturalism Proper.Werner S. Pluhar - 1977 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 4 (1):15-30.
    In this paper the author argues that nonnaturalism, the theory which holds that ethical judgments and deliberations are, respectively, assertions of and searches for some supposed "non-natural" ethical facts accessible only to some supposed non-sensuous kind of perception ("intuition"), has been abandoned by philosophers prematurely. For, once construed properly as its rivals have been all along, the theory does not itself make these suppositions as its opponents allege; it merely attributes them by implication to the users of ethical language. The (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5.  8
    Nonnaturalism Proper.Werner S. Pluhar - 1977 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 4 (1):15-30.
    In this paper the author argues that nonnaturalism, the theory which holds that ethical judgments and deliberations are, respectively, assertions of and searches for some supposed "non-natural" ethical facts accessible only to some supposed non-sensuous kind of perception, has been abandoned by philosophers prematurely. For, once construed properly as its rivals have been all along, the theory does not itself make these suppositions as its opponents allege; it merely attributes them by implication to the users of ethical language. The author (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark