Results for 'Weakly-compact cardinals'

1000+ found
Order:
  1.  19
    Indestructible Weakly Compact Cardinals and the Necessity of Supercompactness for Certain Proof Schemata.J. D. Hamkins & A. W. Apter - 2001 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 47 (4):563-572.
    We show that if the weak compactness of a cardinal is made indestructible by means of any preparatory forcing of a certain general type, including any forcing naively resembling the Laver preparation, then the cardinal was originally supercompact. We then apply this theorem to show that the hypothesis of supercompactness is necessary for certain proof schemata.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  2.  16
    Weakly compact cardinals: A combinatorial proof.S. Shelah - 1979 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 44 (4):559-562.
  3.  49
    Weakly compact cardinals in models of set theory.Ali Enayat - 1985 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 50 (2):476-486.
  4.  35
    The least weakly compact cardinal can be unfoldable, weakly measurable and nearly $${\theta}$$ θ -supercompact.Brent Cody, Moti Gitik, Joel David Hamkins & Jason A. Schanker - 2015 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 54 (5-6):491-510.
    We prove from suitable large cardinal hypotheses that the least weakly compact cardinal can be unfoldable, weakly measurable and even nearly θ\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${\theta}$$\end{document}-supercompact, for any desired θ\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${\theta}$$\end{document}. In addition, we prove several global results showing how the entire class of weakly compactcardinals, a proper class, can be made to coincide with the class of unfoldable cardinals, with the class (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  5.  12
    A Remark on Weakly Compact Cardinals.Tapani Hyttinen - 2002 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 48 (3):397-402.
    We show that if κ is weakly compact, then κ → 3holds for treelike partitions. As an application we study model constructions.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  6.  13
    Square below a non-weakly compact cardinal.Hazel Brickhill - 2020 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 59 (3-4):409-426.
    In his seminal paper introducing the fine structure of L, Jensen proved that under \ any regular cardinal that reflects stationary sets is weakly compact. In this paper we give a new proof of Jensen’s result that is straight-forward and accessible to those without a knowledge of Jensen’s fine structure theory. The proof here instead uses hyperfine structure, a very natural and simpler alternative to fine structure theory introduced by Friedman and Koepke.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7.  17
    Chain conditions of products, and weakly compact cardinals.Assaf Rinot - 2014 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 20 (3):293-314,.
    The history of productivity of the κ-chain condition in partial orders, topological spaces, or Boolean algebras is surveyed, and its connection to the set-theoretic notion of a weakly compact cardinal is highlighted. Then, it is proved that for every regular cardinal κ > א1, the principle □ is equivalent to the existence of a certain strong coloring c : [κ]2 → κ for which the family of fibers T is a nonspecial κ-Aronszajn tree. The theorem follows from an (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  8.  98
    The Necessary Maximality Principle for c. c. c. forcing is equiconsistent with a weakly compact cardinal.Joel D. Hamkins & W. Hugh Woodin - 2005 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 51 (5):493-498.
    The Necessary Maximality Principle for c. c. c. forcing with real parameters is equiconsistent with the existence of a weakly compact cardinal. (© 2005 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim).
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  9.  20
    A Polarized Partition Relation for Weakly Compact Cardinals Using Elementary Substructures.Albin L. Jones - 2006 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 71 (4):1342 - 1352.
    We show that if κ is a weakly compact cardinal, then $\left( \matrix \kappa ^{+} \\ \kappa\endmatrix \right)\rightarrow \left(\left( \matrix \alpha \\ \kappa \endmatrix \right)_{m}\left( \matrix \kappa ^{n} \\ \kappa \endmatrix \right)_{\mu}\right)^{1,1}$ for any ordinals α < κ⁺ and µ < κ, and any finite ordinals m and n. This polarized partition relation represents the statement that for any partition $\kappa \times \kappa ^{+}=\underset i<m\to{\bigcup }K_{i}\cup \underset j<\mu \to{\bigcup }L_{j}$ of κ × κ⁺ into m + µ pieces (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  10.  41
    Successive weakly compact or singular cardinals.Ralf-Dieter Schindler - 1999 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 64 (1):139-146.
    It is shown in ZF that if $\delta are such that δ and δ + are either both weakly compact or singular cardinals and Ω is large enough for putting the core model apparatus into action then there is an inner model with a Woodin cardinal.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  11.  11
    The strength of choiceless patterns of singular and weakly compact cardinals.Daniel Busche & Ralf Schindler - 2009 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 159 (1-2):198-248.
    We extend the core model induction technique to a choiceless context, and we exploit it to show that each one of the following two hypotheses individually implies that , the Axiom of Determinacy, holds in the of a generic extension of : every uncountable cardinal is singular, and every infinite successor cardinal is weakly compact and every uncountable limit cardinal is singular.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  12. Successive Weakly Compact or Singular Cardinals.Ralf-Dieter Schindler - 1999 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 64 (1):139-146.
    It is shown in ZF that if $\delta < \delta^+ < \Omega$ are such that $\delta$ and $\delta^+$ are either both weakly compact or singular cardinals and $\Omega$ is large enough for putting the core model apparatus into action then there is an inner model with a Woodin cardinal.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  13.  54
    Generic embeddings associated to an indestructibly weakly compact cardinal.Gunter Fuchs - 2010 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 162 (1):89-105.
    I use generic embeddings induced by generic normal measures on that can be forced to exist if κ is an indestructibly weakly compact cardinal. These embeddings can be applied in order to obtain the forcing axioms in forcing extensions. This has consequences in : The Singular Cardinal Hypothesis holds above κ, and κ has a useful Jónsson-like property. This in turn implies that the countable tower works much like it does when κ is a Woodin limit of Woodin (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  14.  10
    Forcing a □(κ)-like principle to hold at a weakly compact cardinal.Brent Cody, Victoria Gitman & Chris Lambie-Hanson - 2021 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 172 (7):102960.
  15.  13
    A saturation property of ideals and weakly compact cardinals.Joji Takahashi - 1986 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 51 (3):513-525.
  16.  17
    The weakly compact reflection principle need not imply a high order of weak compactness.Brent Cody & Hiroshi Sakai - 2020 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 59 (1-2):179-196.
    The weakly compact reflection principle\\) states that \ is a weakly compact cardinal and every weakly compact subset of \ has a weakly compact proper initial segment. The weakly compact reflection principle at \ implies that \ is an \-weakly compact cardinal. In this article we show that the weakly compact reflection principle does not imply that \ is \\)-weakly compact. Moreover, we show that (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  17.  14
    Two-cardinal versions of weak compactness: Partitions of pairs.Pierre Matet & Toshimichi Usuba - 2012 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 163 (1):1-22.
  18.  22
    Weakly measurable cardinals.Jason A. Schanker - 2011 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 57 (3):266-280.
    In this article, we introduce the notion of weakly measurable cardinal, a new large cardinal concept obtained by weakening the familiar concept of a measurable cardinal. Specifically, a cardinal κ is weakly measurable if for any collection equation image containing at most κ+ many subsets of κ, there exists a nonprincipal κ-complete filter on κ measuring all sets in equation image. Every measurable cardinal is weakly measurable, but a weakly measurable cardinal need not be measurable. Moreover, (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  19.  6
    Adding a Nonreflecting Weakly Compact Set.Brent Cody - 2019 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 60 (3):503-521.
    For n<ω, we say that theΠn1-reflection principle holds at κ and write Refln if and only if κ is a Πn1-indescribable cardinal and every Πn1-indescribable subset of κ has a Πn1-indescribable proper initial segment. The Πn1-reflection principle Refln generalizes a certain stationary reflection principle and implies that κ is Πn1-indescribable of order ω. We define a forcing which shows that the converse of this implication can be false in the case n=1; that is, we show that κ being Π11-indescribable of (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  20.  43
    Weak compactness and no partial squares.John Krueger - 2011 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 76 (3):1035 - 1060.
    We present a characterization of weakly compact cardinals in terms of generalized stationarity. We apply this characterization to construct a model with no partial square sequences.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  21.  29
    Proof theory of weak compactness.Toshiyasu Arai - 2013 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 13 (1):1350003.
    We show that the existence of a weakly compact cardinal over the Zermelo–Fraenkel's set theory ZF is proof-theoretically reducible to iterations of Mostowski collapsings and Mahlo operations.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  22.  12
    Partition Complete Boolean Algebras and Almost Compact Cardinals.Peter Jipsen & Henry Rose - 1999 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 45 (2):241-255.
    For an infinite cardinal K a stronger version of K-distributivity for Boolean algebras, called k-partition completeness, is defined and investigated . It is shown that every k-partition complete Boolean algebra is K-weakly representable, and for strongly inaccessible K these concepts coincide. For regular K ≥ u, it is proved that an atomless K-partition complete Boolean algebra is an updirected union of basic K-tree algebras. Using K-partition completeness, the concept of γ-almost compactness is introduced for γ ≥ K. For strongly (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  23.  22
    Combinatorial Characterization of Supercompact Cardinals.Flipping Properties and Supercompact Cardinals.P κ λ-Generalizations of Weak Compactness.The Structure of Ineffability Properties of P κ λ.P κ λ Partition Relations.A Note on the λ-Shelah Property. [REVIEW]Julius B. Barbanel - 1991 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 56 (3):1097.
  24.  11
    Weak Covering at Large Cardinals.Ralf ‐ Dieter Schindler - 1997 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 43 (1):22-28.
    We show that weakly compact cardinals are the smallest large cardinals k where k+ < k+ is impossible provided 0# does not exist. We also show that if k+Kc < k+ for some k being weakly compact , then there is a transitive set M with M ⊨ ZFC + “there is a strong cardinal”.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  25.  11
    Weak covering at large cardinals.Ralf‐Dieter Schindler - 1997 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 43 (1):22-28.
    We show that weakly compact cardinals are the smallest large cardinals k where k+ < k+ is impossible provided 0# does not exist. We also show that if k+Kc < k+ for some k being weakly compact , then there is a transitive set M with M ⊨ ZFC + “there is a strong cardinal”.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  26.  10
    Compactness versus hugeness at successor cardinals.Sean Cox & Monroe Eskew - 2022 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 23 (1).
    If [Formula: see text] is regular and [Formula: see text], then the existence of a weakly presaturated ideal on [Formula: see text] implies [Formula: see text]. This partially answers a question of Foreman and Magidor about the approachability ideal on [Formula: see text]. As a corollary, we show that if there is a presaturated ideal [Formula: see text] on [Formula: see text] such that [Formula: see text] is semiproper, then CH holds. We also show some barriers to getting the (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  27. Square compactness and Lindelöf trees.Pedro E. Marun - forthcoming - Archive for Mathematical Logic:1-17.
    We prove that every weakly square compact cardinal is a strong limit cardinal, and therefore weakly compact. We also study Aronszajn trees with no uncountable finitely splitting subtrees, characterizing them in terms of being Lindelöf with respect to a particular topology. We prove that the class of such trees is consistently non-empty and lies between the classes of Suslin and Aronszajn trees.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  28.  15
    Structural reflection, shrewd cardinals and the size of the continuum.Philipp Lücke - 2022 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 22 (2).
    Journal of Mathematical Logic, Volume 22, Issue 02, August 2022. Motivated by results of Bagaria, Magidor and Väänänen, we study characterizations of large cardinal properties through reflection principles for classes of structures. More specifically, we aim to characterize notions from the lower end of the large cardinal hierarchy through the principle [math] introduced by Bagaria and Väänänen. Our results isolate a narrow interval in the large cardinal hierarchy that is bounded from below by total indescribability and from above by subtleness, (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  29.  28
    Tameness from large cardinal axioms.Will Boney - 2014 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 79 (4):1092-1119.
    We show that Shelah’s Eventual Categoricity Conjecture for successors follows from the existence of class many strongly compact cardinals. This is the first time the consistency of this conjecture has been proven. We do so by showing that every AEC withLS below a strongly compact cardinalκis <κ-tame and applying the categoricity transfer of Grossberg and VanDieren [11]. These techniques also apply to measurable and weakly compact cardinals and we prove similar tameness results under those (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   23 citations  
  30.  13
    Compactness and guessing principles in the Radin extensions.Omer Ben-Neria & Jing Zhang - 2023 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 23 (2).
    We investigate the interaction between compactness principles and guessing principles in the Radin forcing extensions. In particular, we show that in any Radin forcing extension with respect to a measure sequence on [Formula: see text], if [Formula: see text] is weakly compact, then [Formula: see text] holds. This provides contrast with a well-known theorem of Woodin, who showed that in a certain Radin extension over a suitably prepared ground model relative to the existence of large cardinals, the (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  31.  53
    Strongly unfoldable cardinals made indestructible.Thomas A. Johnstone - 2008 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 73 (4):1215-1248.
    I provide indestructibility results for large cardinals consistent with V = L, such as weakly compact, indescribable and strongly unfoldable cardinals. The Main Theorem shows that any strongly unfoldable cardinal κ can be made indestructible by <κ-closed. κ-proper forcing. This class of posets includes for instance all <κ-closed posets that are either κ -c.c, or ≤κ-strategically closed as well as finite iterations of such posets. Since strongly unfoldable cardinals strengthen both indescribable and weakly (...) cardinals, the Main Theorem therefore makes these two large cardinal notions similarly indestructible. Finally. I apply the Main Theorem forcing extension preserving all strongly unfoldable cardinals in which every strongly unfoldable cardinal κ is indestructible by <κ-closed. κ-proper forcing. (shrink)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  32.  35
    Ramsey-like cardinals.Victoria Gitman - 2011 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 76 (2):519 - 540.
    One of the numerous characterizations of a Ramsey cardinal κ involves the existence of certain types of elementary embeddings for transitive sets of size κ satisfying a large fragment of ZFC. We introduce new large cardinal axioms generalizing the Ramsey elementary embeddings characterization and show that they form a natural hierarchy between weakly compact cardinals and measurable cardinals. These new axioms serve to further our knowledge about the elementary embedding properties of smaller large cardinals, in (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  33.  38
    Diamonds, compactness, and measure sequences.Omer Ben-Neria - 2019 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 19 (1):1950002.
    We establish the consistency of the failure of the diamond principle on a cardinal [Formula: see text] which satisfies a strong simultaneous reflection property. The result is based on an analysis of Radin forcing, and further leads to a characterization of weak compactness of [Formula: see text] in a Radin generic extension.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  34.  43
    On successors of Jónsson cardinals.J. Vickers & P. D. Welch - 2000 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 39 (6):465-473.
    We show that, like singular cardinals, and weakly compact cardinals, Jensen's core model K for measures of order zero [4] calculates correctly the successors of Jónsson cardinals, assuming $O^{Sword}$ does not exist. Namely, if $\kappa$ is a Jónsson cardinal then $\kappa^+ = \kappa^{+K}$ , provided that there is no non-trivial elementary embedding $j:K \longrightarrow K$ . There are a number of related results in ZFC concerning $\cal{P}(\kappa)$ in V and inner models, for $\kappa$ a Jónsson (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  35.  29
    On unfoldable cardinals, ω-closed cardinals, and the beginning of the inner model hierarchy.P. D. Welch - 2004 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 43 (4):443-458.
    Let κ be a cardinal, and let H κ be the class of sets of hereditary cardinality less than κ ; let τ (κ) > κ be the height of the smallest transitive admissible set containing every element of {κ}∪H κ . We show that a ZFC-definable notion of long unfoldability, a generalisation of weak compactness, implies in the core model K, that the mouse order restricted to H κ is as long as τ. (It is known that some weak (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  36.  71
    Diamond (on the regulars) can fail at any strongly unfoldable cardinal.Mirna Džamonja & Joel David Hamkins - 2006 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 144 (1-3):83-95.
    If κ is any strongly unfoldable cardinal, then this is preserved in a forcing extension in which κ fails. This result continues the progression of the corresponding results for weakly compact cardinals, due to Woodin, and for indescribable cardinals, due to Hauser.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  37.  87
    Inner models with large cardinal features usually obtained by forcing.Arthur W. Apter, Victoria Gitman & Joel David Hamkins - 2012 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 51 (3-4):257-283.
    We construct a variety of inner models exhibiting features usually obtained by forcing over universes with large cardinals. For example, if there is a supercompact cardinal, then there is an inner model with a Laver indestructible supercompact cardinal. If there is a supercompact cardinal, then there is an inner model with a supercompact cardinal κ for which 2κ = κ+, another for which 2κ = κ++ and another in which the least strongly compact cardinal is supercompact. If there (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  38.  55
    Small forcing makes any cardinal superdestructible.Joel David Hamkins - 1998 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 63 (1):51-58.
    Small forcing always ruins the indestructibility of an indestructible supercompact cardinal. In fact, after small forcing, any cardinal κ becomes superdestructible--any further <κ--closed forcing which adds a subset to κ will destroy the measurability, even the weak compactness, of κ. Nevertheless, after small forcing indestructible cardinals remain resurrectible, but never strongly resurrectible.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  39.  59
    Weak covering and the tree property.Ralf-Dieter Schindler - 1999 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 38 (8):515-520.
    Suppose that there is no transitive model of ZFC + there is a strong cardinal, and let K denote the core model. It is shown that if $\delta$ has the tree property then $\delta^{+K} = \delta^+$ and $\delta$ is weakly compact in K.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  40.  41
    Two weak consequences of 0#. [REVIEW]M. Gitik, M. Magidor & H. Woodin - 1985 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 50 (3):597 - 603.
    It is proven that the following statement: "there exists a club $C \subseteq \kappa$ such that every α ∈ C is an inaccessible cardinal in L and, for every δ a limit point of C, C ∩ δ is almost contained in every club of δ of L" is equiconsistent with a weakly compact cardinal if κ = ℵ 1 , and with a weakly compact cardinal of order 1 if κ = ℵ 2.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  41. Small Forcing Makes any Cardinal Superdestructible.Joel Hamkins - 1998 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 63 (1):51-58.
    Small forcing always ruins the indestructibility of an indestructible supercompact cardinal. In fact, after small forcing, any cardinal $\kappa$ becomes superdestructible--any further <$\kappa$--closed forcing which adds a subset to $\kappa$ will destroy the measurability, even the weak compactness, of $\kappa$. Nevertheless, after small forcing indestructible cardinals remain resurrectible, but never strongly resurrectible.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  42.  40
    Applications of pcf for mild large cardinals to elementary embeddings.Moti Gitik & Saharon Shelah - 2013 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 164 (9):855-865.
    The following pcf results are proved:1. Assume thatκ>ℵ0κ>ℵ0is a weakly compact cardinal. Letμ>2κμ>2κbe a singular cardinal of cofinality κ. Then for every regularView the MathML sourceλ sup{suppcfσ⁎-complete|a⊆Reg∩and|a|<μ}.Turn MathJax onAs an application we show that:if κ is a measurable cardinal andj:V→Mj:V→Mis the elementary embedding by a κ-complete ultrafilter over κ, then for every τ the following holds:1. ifjjis a cardinal thenj=τj=τ;2. |j|=|j)||j|=|j)|;3. for any κ-complete ultrafilter W on κ, |j|=|jW||j|=|jW|.The first two items provide affirmative answers to questions from Gitik (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  43.  15
    Orders of Indescribable Sets.Alex Hellsten - 2006 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 45 (6):705-714.
    We extract some properties of Mahlo’s operation and show that some other very natural operations share these properties. The weakly compact sets form a similar hierarchy as the stationary sets. The height of this hierarchy is a large cardinal property connected to saturation properties of the weakly compact ideal.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  44.  46
    Weak square bracket relations for P κ (λ).Pierre Matet - 2008 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 73 (3):729-751.
    We study the partition relation $X@>{\rm w}>>[Y]_{p}^{2}$ that is a weakening of the usual partition relation $X\rightarrow [Y]_{p}^{2}$ . Our main result asserts that if κ is an uncountable strongly compact cardinal and $\germ{d}_{\kappa}\leq \lambda ^{<\kappa}$ , then $I_{\kappa,\lambda}^{+}@>{\rm w}>>[I_{\kappa,\lambda}^{+}]_{\lambda <\kappa}^{2}$ does not hold.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  45.  30
    Proper forcing extensions and Solovay models.Joan Bagaria & Roger Bosch - 2004 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 43 (6):739-750.
    We study the preservation of the property of being a Solovay model under proper projective forcing extensions. We show that every strongly-proper forcing notion preserves this property. This yields that the consistency strength of the absoluteness of under strongly-proper forcing notions is that of the existence of an inaccessible cardinal. Further, the absoluteness of under projective strongly-proper forcing notions is consistent relative to the existence of a -Mahlo cardinal. We also show that the consistency strength of the absoluteness of under (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  46.  49
    On splitting stationary subsets of large cardinals.James E. Baumgartner, Alan D. Taylor & Stanley Wagon - 1977 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 42 (2):203-214.
    Let κ denote a regular uncountable cardinal and NS the normal ideal of nonstationary subsets of κ. Our results concern the well-known open question whether NS fails to be κ + -saturated, i.e., are there κ + stationary subsets of κ with pairwise intersections nonstationary? Our first observation is: Theorem. NS is κ + -saturated iff for every normal ideal J on κ there is a stationary set $A \subseteq \kappa$ such that $J = NS \mid A = \{X \subseteq (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   20 citations  
  47.  21
    Weak partition properties on trees.Michael Hrušák, Petr Simon & Ondřej Zindulka - 2013 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 52 (5-6):543-567.
    We investigate the following weak Ramsey property of a cardinal κ: If χ is coloring of nodes of the tree κ <ω by countably many colors, call a tree ${T \subseteq \kappa^{ < \omega}}$ χ-homogeneous if the number of colors on each level of T is finite. Write ${\kappa \rightsquigarrow (\lambda)^{ < \omega}_{\omega}}$ to denote that for any such coloring there is a χ-homogeneous λ-branching tree of height ω. We prove, e.g., that if ${\kappa < \mathfrak{p}}$ or ${\kappa > \mathfrak{d}}$ (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  48.  29
    Supercompactness and measurable limits of strong cardinals II: Applications to level by level equivalence.Arthur W. Apter - 2006 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 52 (5):457-463.
    We construct models for the level by level equivalence between strong compactness and supercompactness in which for κ the least supercompact cardinal and δ ≤ κ any cardinal which is either a strong cardinal or a measurable limit of strong cardinals, 2δ > δ+ and δ is < 2δ supercompact. In these models, the structure of the class of supercompact cardinals can be arbitrary, and the size of the power set of κ can essentially be made as large (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  49.  17
    Tameness, powerful images, and large cardinals.Will Boney & Michael Lieberman - 2020 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 21 (1):2050024.
    We provide comprehensive, level-by-level characterizations of large cardinals, in the range from weakly compact to strongly compact, by closure properties of powerful images of accessible functors. In the process, we show that these properties are also equivalent to various forms of tameness for abstract elementary classes. This systematizes and extends results of [W. Boney and S. Unger, Large cardinal axioms from tameness in AECs, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.145(10) (2017) 4517–4532; A. Brooke-Taylor and J. Rosický, Accessible images (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  50.  81
    Abstract logic and set theory. II. large cardinals.Jouko Väänänen - 1982 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 47 (2):335-346.
    The following problem is studied: How large and how small can the Löwenheim and Hanf numbers of unbounded logics be in relation to the most common large cardinals? The main result is that the Löwenheim number of the logic with the Härtig-quantifier can be consistently put in between any two of the first weakly inaccessible, the first weakly Mahlo, the first weakly compact, the first Ramsey, the first measurable and the first supercompact cardinals.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
1 — 50 / 1000