Order:
  1. Monetary Intelligence and Behavioral Economics: The Enron Effect—Love of Money, Corporate Ethical Values, Corruption Perceptions Index, and Dishonesty Across 31 Geopolitical Entities.Modupe F. Adewuyi, Bolanle E. Adetoun, Ningyu Tang, Jingqiu Chen, Anna Maria Manganelli, Luigina Canova, Martina Trontelj, Caroline Urbain, Theresa Li-Na Tang, Allen F. Stembridge, Petar Skobic, Elisaveta Gjorgji Sardžoska, Marko Polic, Horia D. Pitariu, Ruja Pholsward, Francisco José Costa Pereira, Mehmet Ferhat Özbek, AAhad M. Osman-Gani, Johnsto E. Osagie, Anthony Ugochukwu Obiajulu Nnedum, Richard T. Mpoyi, Alice S. Moreira, Eva Malovics, Jian Liang, Kilsun Kim, Ali Mahdi Kazem, Chin-Kang Jen, Abdul Hamid Safwat Ibrahim, Consuelo Garcia de la Torre, Linzhi Du, Rosario Correia, Bor-Shiuan Cheng, Mark G. Borg, Abdulgawi Salim Al-Zubaidi, Michael W. Allen, Adebowale Akande, Peter Vlerick, Roberto Luna-Arocas, Brigitte Charles-Pauvers, Randy Ki-Kwan Chiu, Ilya E. Garber, Fernando Arias-Galicia, Thompson S. H. Teo, Vivien K. G. Lim, Mahfooz A. Ansari, Toto Sutarso & Thomas Li-Ping Tang - 2018 - Journal of Business Ethics 148 (4):919-937.
    Monetary intelligence theory asserts that individuals apply their money attitude to frame critical concerns in the context and strategically select certain options to achieve financial goals and ultimate happiness. This study explores the dark side of monetary Intelligence and behavioral economics—dishonesty. Dishonesty, a risky prospect, involves cost–benefit analysis of self-interest. We frame good or bad barrels in the environmental context as a proxy of high or low probability of getting caught for dishonesty, respectively. We theorize: The magnitude and intensity of (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  2.  90
    To Help or Not to Help? The Good Samaritan Effect and the Love of Money on Helping Behavior.Thomas Li-Ping Tang, Toto Sutarso, Grace Mei-Tzu Wu Davis, Dariusz Dolinski, Abdul Hamid Safwat Ibrahim & Sharon Lynn Wagner - 2008 - Journal of Business Ethics 82 (4):865-887.
    This research tests a model of employee helping behavior (a component of Organizational Citizenship Behavior, OCB) that involves a direct path (Intrinsic Motives → Helping Behavior, the Good Samaritan Effect) and an indirect path (the Love of Money → Extrinsic Motives → Helping Behavior). Results for the full sample supported the Good Samaritan Effect. Further, the love of money was positively related to extrinsic motives that were negatively related with helping behavior. We tested the model across four cultures (the USA., (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   30 citations  
  3.  50
    Falling or Not Falling into Temptation? Multiple Faces of Temptation, Monetary Intelligence, and Unethical Intentions Across Gender.Thomas Li-Ping Tang & Toto Sutarso - 2013 - Journal of Business Ethics 116 (3):529-552.
    We develop a theoretical model, explore the relationship between temptation (both reflective and formative) and unethical intentions by treating monetary intelligence (MI) as a mediator, and examine the direct (temptation to unethical intentions) and indirect (temptation to MI to unethical intentions) paths simultaneously based on multiple-wave panel data collected from 340 part-time employees and university (business) students. The positive indirect path suggested that yielding to temptation (e.g., high cognitive impairment and lack of self-control) led to poor MI (low stewardship behavior, (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   19 citations  
  4. Monetary Intelligence and Behavioral Economics Across 32 Cultures: Good Apples Enjoy Good Quality of Life in Good Barrels.Ningyu Tang, Jingqiu Chen, Martina Trontelj, Caroline Urbain, Theresa Li-Na Tang, Allen F. Stembridge, Petar Skobic, Elisaveta Gjorgji Sardžoska, Marko Polic, Horia D. Pitariu, Ruja Pholsward, Francisco José Costa Pereira, Mehmet Ferhat Özbek, AAhad M. Osman-Gani, Johnsto E. Osagie, Anthony Ugochukwu Obiajulu Nnedum, Richard T. Mpoyi, Alice S. Moreira, Anna Maria Manganelli, Eva Malovics, Jian Liang, Kilsun Kim, Ali Mahdi Kazem, Chin-Kang Jen, Abdul Hamid Safwat Ibrahim, Consuelo Garcia de la Torre, Linzhi Du, Rosario Correia, Bor-Shiuan Cheng, Luigina Canova, Mark G. Borg, Abdulgawi Salim Al-Zubaidi, Michael W. Allen, Adebowale Akande, Peter Vlerick, Roberto Luna-Arocas, Brigitte Charles-Pauvers, Randy Ki-Kwan Chiu, Ilya E. Garber, Fernando Arias-Galicia, Thompson Sian Hin Teo, Vivien Kim Geok Lim, Mahfooz A. Ansari, Toto Sutarso & Thomas Li-Ping Tang - 2018 - Journal of Business Ethics 148 (4):893-917.
    Monetary Intelligence theory asserts that individuals apply their money attitude to frame critical concerns in the context and strategically select certain options to achieve financial goals and ultimate happiness. This study explores the bright side of Monetary Intelligence and behavioral economics, frames money attitude in the context of pay and life satisfaction, and controls money at the macro-level and micro-level. We theorize: Managers with low love of money motive but high stewardship behavior will have high subjective well-being: pay satisfaction and (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations