Order:
Disambiguations
Thomas J. Regan [4]Thomas H. Regan [2]Thomas Howard Regan [1]Thomas Regan [1]
See also
Thomas Regan
Last affiliation: North Carolina State University
  1.  27
    The Problem of the Trinity in Whitehead's Philosophy of God.Thomas J. Regan - 1985 - Modern Schoolman 62 (4):317 - 335.
    THIS ARTICLE EXAMINES THREE QUESTIONS: (1) HOW CAN A TRIUNE NOTION OF GOD BE ACCOMMODATED IN WHITEHEAD’S DI-POLAR THEISM? (2) HOW CAN GOD BE THREE PERSONS AND YET ONE ACTUAL ENTITY? AND (3) HOW CAN GOD BE BOTH IMMANENT AND TRANSCENDENT? AFTER LOOKING AT THE WORK OF JOSEPH BRACKEN, S J AND LEWIS FORD ON THESE QUESTIONS, IT IS CONCLUDED THAT WHITEHEAD’S PHILOSOPHY CANNOT SERVE AS THE GROUND FOR A TRADITIONAL INTERPRETATION OF TRINITARIAN THEOLOGY WITHOUT INVOLVING MAJOR DISTORTIONS OF HIS (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2.  24
    Justice as Fittingness.Thomas J. Regan - 1998 - International Philosophical Quarterly 38 (3):332-333.
  3.  22
    Evil and the Concept of God. By Edward H. Madden and Peter H. Hare. Springfield, Illinois, Charles C. Thomas, Publisher, 1968. Pp. 142. $8.00. [REVIEW]Thomas H. Regan - 1968 - Dialogue 7 (3):507-509.
  4.  11
    The Problem of the Trinity in Whitehead's Philosophy of God.Thomas J. Regan - 1985 - Modern Schoolman 62 (4):317-329.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5.  20
    Absolutism and Relativism in Ethics. By Shia Moser. Springfield, Illinois, Charles C. Thomas. 1968. Pp. Xii, 225. $10.50. [REVIEW]Thomas H. Regan - 1969 - Dialogue 7 (4):688-689.
  6.  10
    The Matrix of Personality.Thomas J. Regan - 1990 - Process Studies 19 (3):189-198.
  7. Animal Rights: A Reply to Frey's Animal Rights.Dale Jamieson & Thomas Regan - 1978 - Analysis 38.
    In his paper, "animal rights" ("analysis" 37.4), R g frey claims to refute "the most important argument" for the view that animals have rights. We show that no prominent defender of the rights of animals has argued, Or should argue, In the way that frey suggests. Furthermore, We show that there is a plausible argument for the view that animals have rights that is left undiscussed by frey.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation