6 found
Order:
Disambiguations
Terrence Reynolds [4]Terrence Paul Reynolds [1]Terrence P. Reynolds [1]
  1.  49
    Human Longing in the Later Theology of Dietrich Bonhoeffer.J. Giles Milhaven & Terrence Reynolds - 1989 - Thought: Fordham University Quarterly 64 (4):326-343.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2.  48
    Moral absolutism and abortion: Alan Donagan on the hysterectomy and craniotomy cases.Terrence Reynolds - 1985 - Ethics 95 (4):866-873.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3. Method Divorced from Content in Theology? An Assessment of Lonergan's «Method in Theology».Terrence Reynolds - 1991 - The Thomist 55 (2):245-269.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4.  7
    The Coherence of Life Without God Before God: The Problem of Earthly Desires in the Later Theology of Dietrich Bonhoeffer.Terrence Paul Reynolds - 1988 - Upa.
    In his Letters and Papers from Prison, Dietrich Bonhoeffer urges Christians to feel their longings for earthly realities to the fullest, and argues that such yearnings strengthen faith. This issue has been overlooked by Bonhoeffer scholars, despite its central place in the Letters; this study seeks to correct that oversight. Through a selective, chronological analysis of the Ethics, this text shows Bonhoeffer progressively developing a positive view of the natural and of fallen life which undergirds his later encouragement of secular (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5.  6
    Two mcfagues: Meaning, truth, and justification in models of God.Terrence Reynolds - 1995 - Modern Theology 11 (3):289-313.
  6.  32
    A Conversation Worth Having: Hauerwas and Gustafson on Substance in Theological Ethics.Terrence P. Reynolds - 2000 - Journal of Religious Ethics 28 (3):395 - 421.
    When a debate is misplaced, new problems are cast in the distorting language of the settled problems of the past while, at the same time, the participants in the debate are assimilated into communities of thought with which they have little in common. The result is that their work, and our response to it, is distorted. This article contends that the polemical debate between James Gustafson (and his followers) and Stanley Hauerwas (and his followers) is just such a misplaced debate. (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark