9 found
Steven R. Quartz [9]Steven Richard Quartz [1]
  1. The neural basis of cognitive development: A constructivist manifesto.Steven R. Quartz & Terrence J. Sejnowski - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (4):537-556.
    How do minds emerge from developing brains? According to the representational features of cortex are built from the dynamic interaction between neural growth mechanisms and environmentally derived neural activity. Contrary to popular selectionist models that emphasize regressive mechanisms, the neurobiological evidence suggests that this growth is a progressive increase in the representational properties of cortex. The interaction between the environment and neural growth results in a flexible type of learning: minimizes the need for prespecification in accordance with recent neurobiological evidence (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   103 citations  
  2.  43
    Neural networks, nativism, and the plausibility of constructivism.Steven R. Quartz - 1993 - Cognition 48 (3):223-242.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   42 citations  
  3. Reason, emotion and decision-making: risk and reward computation with feeling.Steven R. Quartz - 2009 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 13 (5):209-215.
  4.  61
    From cognitive science to cognitive neuroscience to neuroeconomics.Steven R. Quartz - 2008 - Economics and Philosophy 24 (3):459-471.
    As an emerging discipline, neuroeconomics faces considerable methodological and practical challenges. In this paper, I suggest that these challenges can be understood by exploring the similarities and dissimilarities between the emergence of neuroeconomics and the emergence of cognitive and computational neuroscience two decades ago. From these parallels, I suggest the major challenge facing theory formation in the neural and behavioural sciences is that of being under-constrained by data, making a detailed understanding of physical implementation necessary for theory construction in neuroeconomics. (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  5.  59
    Innateness and the brain.Steven R. Quartz - 2003 - Biology and Philosophy 18 (1):13-40.
    The philosophical innateness debate has long relied onpsychological evidence. For a century, however, a parallel debate hastaken place within neuroscience. In this paper, I consider theimplications of this neuroscience debate for the philosophicalinnateness debate. By combining the tools of theoretical neurobiologyand learning theory, I introduce the ``problem of development'' that alladaptive systems must solve, and suggest how responses to this problemcan demarcate a number of innateness proposals. From this perspective, Isuggest that the majority of natural systems are in fact innate. (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  6.  31
    Beyond modularity: Neural evidence for constructivist principles in development.Steven R. Quartz & Terrence J. Sejnowski - 1994 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17 (4):725-726.
  7.  22
    Box 1. Cortical pre-specfication: evolutionary and developmental considerations.S. R. Quartz & Steven R. Quartz - 1999 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3 (2):48-57.
    Direct download  
    Export citation  
  8.  38
    Distinguishing between the computational and dynamical hypotheses: What difference makes the difference?Steven R. Quartz - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):649-650.
    Van Gelder seeks to distinguish between the computational and the dynamical hypotheses primarily on the basis of ontic criteria – the kind of systems cognitive agents really are. I suggest that this meets with mixed success. By shifting to epistemic criteria – what kind of explanations we require to understand cognitive agents – I suggest there is an easier and more intuitive way to distinguish between these two competing views of cognitive agents.
    Direct download (8 more)  
    Export citation  
  9.  25
    Controversies and issues in developmental theories of mind: Some constructive remarks.Steven R. Quartz & T. J. Sejnowski - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (4):578-588.
    As the commentaries reveal, cognitive neuroscience's first steps toward a theory of development are marked by vigorous debate, ranging from basic points of definition to the fine details of mechanism. In this Response, we present the neural constructivist position on this broad spectrum of issues, from basic questions such as what sets constructivism apart from other theories (particularly selectionism) to its relation to behavioral theories and to its underlying mechanisms. We conclude that the real value of global theories at this (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
    Export citation