9 found
Order:
  1. Parallels between perception without attention and perception without awareness.Philip M. Merikle & Steve Joordens - 1997 - Consciousness and Cognition 6 (2-3):219-36.
    Do studies of perception without awareness and studies of perception without attention address a similar underlying concept of awareness? To answer this question, we compared qualitative differences in performance across variations in stimulus quality with qualitative differences in performance across variations in the direction of attention . The qualitative differences were based on three different phenomena: Stroop priming, false recognition, and exclusion failure. In all cases, variations in stimulus quality and variations in the direction of attention led to parallel findings. (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   54 citations  
  2.  78
    Measuring the relative magnitude of unconscious influences.Philip M. Merikle, Steve Joordens & Jennifer A. Stolz - 1995 - Consciousness and Cognition 4 (4):422-39.
    As an alternative to establishing awareness thresholds, stimulus contexts in which there were either greater conscious or greater unconscious influences were defined on the basis of performance on an exclusion task. Target words were presented for brief durations and each target word was followed immediately by its three-letter stem. Subjects were instructed to complete each stem with any word other than the target word. With this task, failures to exclude target words indicate greater unconscious influences, whereas successful exclusion indicates greater (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   40 citations  
  3.  31
    The eyes know what you are thinking: Eye movements as an objective measure of mind wandering.Sarah Uzzaman & Steve Joordens - 2011 - Consciousness and Cognition 20 (4):1882-1886.
    Paralleling the recent work by Reichle, Reineberg, and Schooler , we explore the use of eye movements as an objective measure of mind wandering while participants performed a reading task. Participants were placed in a self-classified probe-caught mind wandering paradigm while their eye movements were recorded. They were randomly probed every 2–3 min and were required to indicate whether their mind had been wandering. The results show that eye movements were generally less complex when participants reported mind wandering episodes, with (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   18 citations  
  4.  76
    When timing the mind should also mind the timing: Biases in the measurement of voluntary actions.Steve Joordens, Marc van Duijn & Thomas M. Spalek - 2002 - Consciousness and Cognition 11 (2):231-40.
    Trevena and Miller provide further evidence that readiness potentials occur in the brain prior to the time that participants claim to have initiated a voluntary movement, a contention originally forwarded by Libet, Gleason, Wright, and Pearl . In their examination of this issue, though, aspects of their data lead them to question whether their measurement of the initiation of a voluntary movement was accurate. The current article addresses this concern by providing a direct analysis of biases in this task. This (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  5.  18
    Selective attention: A reevaluation of the implications of negative priming.Bruce Milliken, Steve Joordens, Philip M. Merikle & Adriane E. Seiffert - 1998 - Psychological Review 105 (2):203-229.
  6.  22
    Independence or redundancy? Two models of conscious and unconscious influences.Steve Joordens & Philip M. Merikle - 1993 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 122 (4):462-67.
  7.  38
    Turning the process-dissociation procedure inside-out: A new technique for understanding the relation between conscious and unconscious influences.Steve Joordens, Daryl E. Wilson, Thomas M. Spalek & Dwayne E. Paré - 2010 - Consciousness and Cognition 19 (1):270-280.
    While there is now general agreement that memory gives rise to both conscious and unconscious influences, there remains disagreement concerning the process architecture underlying these distinct influences. Do they arise from independent underlying systems or from systems that are interactive ? In the current paper we present a novel “inside-out” technique that can be used with the process-dissociation paradigm to arrive at more concrete conclusions concerning this central question and demonstrate this technique via a meta-analysis of currently published findings. Our (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  8. Yoked criteria shifts in decision system adaptation: Computational and behavioral investigations.Blair C. Armstrong, Steve Joordens & David C. Plaut - 2009 - In N. A. Taatgen & H. van Rijn (eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9.  27
    Everyone'sa Critic: Memory Models and Uses for an Artificial Turing Judge.W. Joseph MacInnes, Blair C. Armstrong, Dwayne Pare, George S. Cree & Steve Joordens - 2009 - In B. Goertzel, P. Hitzler & M. Hutter (eds.), Proceedings of the Second Conference on Artificial General Intelligence. Atlantis Press.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark