13 found
Order:
Disambiguations
Stephen S. Hanson [13]Stephen Scott Hanson [1]
See also
Stephen S. Hanson
Tulane University
  1.  16
    A Justice-Based Defense of a Litmus Test.Stephen S. Hanson - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics 24 (4):58-60.
    Jecker, et al., argue against rejecting a location for an international bioethics conference based on a “litmus test” for several reasons, ranging from the practical to the theoretical. However, th...
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  2.  9
    Maybe Whole-Brain Death Was Never the Point.Stephen S. Hanson - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 14 (3):277-279.
    As Nair-Collins and Joffe note, the concern that our tests for brain death do not successfully show that all brain functions have stopped is not new (Nair-Collins and Joffe 2023). As our abilities...
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  3.  11
    Reflection Requires Representation.Stephen S. Hanson - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (6):126-128.
    I agree fully that a “clearer picture of how vulnerability might manifest and how it can be accommodated, ideally without resorting to mere exclusion from research, is needed” (Friesen et al. 2023,...
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  4.  26
    The Perspective of an IRB Member.Stephen S. Hanson - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (4):25-27.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  5.  15
    ‘He didn’t want to let his team down’: the challenge of dual loyalty for team physicians.Stephen S. Hanson - 2018 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 45 (3):215-227.
    ABSTRACTTeam physicians have a complicated job that involves potentially conflicting obligations to multiple entities. Though responsible for the medical care of the athletes as individuals, they also have obligations to the team that employs them which can include returning athletes to play who are at heightened risk of re-injury. The fact that the athletes and owners have some overlapping interests only complicates this issue. Further, there are strong financial incentives to do what is necessary to obtain and keep a position (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  6. “More on respect for embryos and potentiality: Does respect for embryos entail respect for in vitro embryos?”.Stephen S. Hanson - 2006 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27 (3):215-226.
    It is commonly assumed that persons who hold abortions to be generally impermissible must, for the same reasons, be opposed to embryonic stem cell research [ESR]. Yet a settled position against abortion does not necessarily direct one to reject that research. The difference in potentiality between the embryos used in ESR and embryos discussed in the abortion debate can make ESR acceptable even if one holds that abortion is impermissible. With regard to their potentiality, in vitro embryos are here argued (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7. Ethics in the Discipline(s) of Bioethics.Stephen S. Hanson - 2011 - HEC Forum 23 (3):171-192.
    The development of a code of ethics for a profession can be an indicator of the coherence and stability of a discipline as a unique and singular entity. Since “bioethics”, as a discipline, is not one profession but many, practiced by persons with not one but many varying responsibilities and training, it has been argued that no code of ethics is possible for the discipline(s) of bioethics. I argue that a code of ethics is possible for bioethics by looking at (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8.  7
    Deference, beneficence and the good life.Stephen S. Hanson - 2023 - Journal of Medical Ethics 49 (11):744-745.
    Makins’s analysis of the philosophical justification of decision-making understates and so misinterprets the importance of patient values to ‘the deference principle.’ (Makins N,1, p1) He assesses autonomy and beneficence as two separate arguments in support of deferring to patient preferences, but they only work well considered together. Further, neither the constitutive nor the evidential view of beneficence fully recognises the importance of patient values to understanding the patient’s worldview, which in turn determines what risks and benefits matter most. Revising these (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9.  30
    Currents in Contemporary Ethics.Stephen S. Hanson - 2007 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 35 (3):486-489.
  10.  19
    Last Chance at Grandchildren:A Request for Perimortem Sperm Harvesting.Stephen S. Hanson & Annie-Laurie Auden - 2014 - Hastings Center Report 44 (1):13-14.
    An anxious resident paged ethics at 2:00 a.m. His patient, Mr. M, a twenty‐nine‐year‐old man with a history of multiple substance abuse, was in the hospital after cardiac arrest and lack of cerebral perfusion. Sadly, the young man probably met the criteria for brain death, but the final apnea test to confirm the diagnosis could not be done for another forty‐eight to seventy‐two hours because the Klonopin in his system might confound the results. The resident's concern, however, addressed a request (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11. pt. 4. The challenge of deriving an ought from an is: Moral acquaintances and natural facts in the Darwinian age.Stephen S. Hanson - 2009 - In Mark J. Cherry (ed.), The normativity of the natural: human goods, human virtues, and human flourishing. [Dordrecht]: Springer.
  12.  28
    Still on the Same Slope: Groningen Breaks No New Ethical Ground.Stephen S. Hanson - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (4):67-68.
    Jotkowitz, Glick, and Gesundheit (2008) rightly critique Manninen (2006) for an errant analysis of the Groningen protocol. However, they draw conclusions about the protocol itself that are not justified. Because of the nature of the care of infants, the Groningen protocol doesn't break new ethical ground. We already have to treat infants without direct access to their autonomous preferences or values; therefore, we are already making the decisions that Jotkowitz, Glick, and Gesundheit argue we are beginning to take once active (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  13.  46
    Moral acquaintances: Loewy, Wildes, and beyond. [REVIEW]Stephen S. Hanson - 2007 - HEC Forum 19 (3):207-225.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation