7 found
  1.  17
    Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access.Stephen D. Goldinger - 1998 - Psychological Review 105 (2):251-279.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   121 citations  
  2.  21
    A multidimensional scaling analysis of own- and cross-race face spaces.Megan H. Papesh & Stephen D. Goldinger - 2010 - Cognition 116 (2):283-288.
    Direct download (7 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  3.  27
    Blinded by magic: eye-movements reveal the misdirection of attention.Anthony S. Barnhart & Stephen D. Goldinger - 2014 - Frontiers in Psychology 5.
    Direct download (6 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  4.  24
    Lexical familiarity and processing efficiency: Individual differences in naming, lexical decision, and semantic categorization.Mary J. Lewellen, Stephen D. Goldinger, David B. Pisoni & Beth G. Greene - 1993 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 122 (3):316.
  5.  38
    Resonance within and between linguistic beings.Stephen D. Goldinger & Tamiko Azuma - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):199-200.
    Pickering & Garrod deserve appreciation for their cogent argument that dialogue merits greater scientific consideration. Current models make little contact with behaviors of dialogue, motivating the interactive alignment theory. However, the theory is not truly “mechanistic.” A full account requires both representations and processes bringing those representations into harmony. We suggest that Grossberg 's adaptive resonance theory may naturally conform to the principles of dialogue.
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Export citation  
  6.  4
    Eye movements and the label feedback effect: Speaking modulates visual search via template integrity.Katherine P. Hebert, Stephen D. Goldinger & Stephen C. Walenchok - 2021 - Cognition 210 (C):104587.
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Export citation  
  7.  14
    It's good . . . But is it ART?Paul A. Luce, Stephen D. Goldinger & Michael S. Vitevitch - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):336-336.
    We applaud Norris et al.'s critical review of the literature on lexical effects in phoneme decision making, and we sympathize with their attempt to reconcile autonomous models of word recognition with current research. However, we suggest that adaptive resonance theory (ART) may provide a coherent account of the data while preserving limited inhibitory feedback among certain lexical and sublexical representations.
    Direct download (4 more)  
    Export citation