11 found
Order:
Disambiguations
Sjoerd D. Zwart [11]Sjoerd Douwe Zwart [1]
See also
Sjoerd D. Zwart
Delft University of Technology
  1. Moral Responsibility and the Problem of Many Hands.Ibo van de Poel, Lambèr Royakkers & Sjoerd D. Zwart - 2015 - Routledge.
    When many people are involved in an activity, it is often difficult, if not impossible, to pinpoint who is morally responsible for what, a phenomenon known as the ‘problem of many hands.’ This term is increasingly used to describe problems with attributing individual responsibility in collective settings in such diverse areas as public administration, corporate management, law and regulation, technological development and innovation, healthcare, and finance. This volume provides an in-depth philosophical analysis of this problem, examining the notion of moral (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  2.  7
    Refined Verisimilitude.Sjoerd D. Zwart - 2001 - Dordrecht and Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    The subject of the present inquiry is the approach-to-the-truth research, which started with the publication of Sir Karl Popper's Conjectures and Refutations. In the decade before this publication, Popper fiercely attacked the ideas of Rudolf Carnap about confirmation and induction; and ten years later, in the famous tenth chapter of Conjectures he introduced his own ideas about scientific progress and verisimilitude. Abhorring inductivism for its apprecia tion of logical weakness rather than strength, Popper tried to show that fallibilism could serve (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  3.  48
    A Network Approach for Distinguishing Ethical Issues in Research and Development.Sjoerd D. Zwart, Ibo van de Poel, Harald van Mil & Michiel Brumsen - 2006 - Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (4):663-684.
    In this paper we report on our experiences with using network analysis to discern and analyse ethical issues in research into, and the development of, a new wastewater treatment technology. Using network analysis, we preliminarily interpreted some of our observations in a Group Decision Room session where we invited important stakeholders to think about the risks of this new technology. We show how a network approach is useful for understanding the observations, and suggests some relevant ethical issues. We argue that (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations  
  4.  7
    Reflective Equilibrium in R & D Networks.Sjoerd D. Zwart & Ibo van de Poel - 2010 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 35 (2):174-199.
    In this article, we develop an approach for the moral assessment of research and development networks on the basis of the reflective equilibrium approach proposed by Rawls and Daniels. The reflective equilibrium approach aims at coherence between moral judgments, principles, and background theories. We use this approach because it takes seriously the moral judgments of the actors involved in R & D, whereas it also leaves room for critical reflection about these judgments. It is shown that two norms, namely reflective (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  5.  31
    Transfer and Templates in Scientific Modelling.Wybo Houkes & Sjoerd D. Zwart - 2019 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 77:93-100.
    The notion of template has recently been discussed in relation to cross-disciplinary transfer of modeling efforts and in relation to the representational content of models. We further develop and disambiguate the notion of template and find that, suitably developed, it is useful in distinguishing and analyzing different types of transfer, none of which supports a non-representationalist view of models. We illustrate our main findings with the modeling of technology substitution with Lotka-Volterra Competition equations.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  6.  58
    Belief Revision and Verisimilitude Based on Preference and Truth Orderings.Gerard R. Renardel de Lavalette & Sjoerd D. Zwart - 2011 - Erkenntnis 75 (2):237-254.
    In this rather technical paper we establish a useful combination of belief revision and verisimilitude according to which better theories provide better predictions, and revising with more verisimilar data results in theories that are closer to the truth. Moreover, this paper presents two alternative definitions of refined verisimilitude, which are more perspicuous than the algebraic version used in previous publications.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  7.  14
    Editorial Introduction: Collins and Tacit Knowledge.Léna Soler & Sjoerd D. Zwart - 2013 - Philosophia Scientae 17:5-23.
  8.  15
    Collins’s Taxonomy of Tacit Knowledge: Critical Analyses and Possible Extensions.Léna Soler & Sjoerd D. Zwart - 2013 - Philosophia Scientae 17:107-134.
  9.  36
    Introduction: Values and Norms in Modeling.Martin Peterson & Sjoerd D. Zwart - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 46:1-2.
  10.  18
    Modeling for Fairness: A Rawlsian Approach.Sven Diekmann & Sjoerd D. Zwart - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 46:46-53.
    In this paper we introduce the overlapping design consensus for the construction of models in design and the related value judgments. The overlapping design consensus is inspired by Rawls’ overlapping consensus. The overlapping design consensus is a well-informed, mutual agreement among all stakeholders based on fairness. Fairness is respected if all stakeholders’ interests are given due and equal attention. For reaching such fair agreement, we apply Rawls’ original position and reflective equilibrium to modeling. We argue that by striving for the (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11. Updating Theories.Sjoerd D. Zwart - 2005 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 83 (1):375-395.
    Kuipers' choice to let logical models of a theory represent the applications or evidence of that theory leads to various problems in ICR. In this paper I elaborate on four of them. 1. In contrast to applications of a theory, logical models are mutually incompatible. 2. An increase and a decrease of a set of models both represent an increase of logical strength; I call this the ICR paradox of logical strength. 3. The evidence logically implies the strongest empirical law. (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark