8 found
Order:
  1.  74
    Defending moral precaution as a solution to the problem of other minds: A reply to Holm and Coggon.Deryck Beyleveld & Shaun D. Pattinson - 2010 - Ratio Juris 23 (2):258-273.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  2. The past, present and future of ethical rationalism.Patrick Capps & Shaun D. Pattinson - 2017 - In Patrick Capps & Shaun D. Pattinson (eds.), Ethical rationalism and the law. Portland, Oregon: Hart Publishing.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  3. Consent and informational responsibility.Shaun D. Pattinson - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (3):176-179.
    The notion of “consent” is frequently referred to as “informed consent” to emphasise the informational component of a valid consent. This article considers aspects of that informational component. One misuse of the language of informed consent is highlighted. Attention is then directed to some features of the situation in which consent would not have been offered had certain information been disclosed. It is argued that whether or not such consent is treated as sufficiently informed must, from a moral point of (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  4.  40
    (1 other version)Moral Interests, Privacy, and Medical Research.Deryck Beyleveld & Shaun D. Pattinson - 2008 - In Michael Boylan (ed.), International Public Health Policy & Ethics. Dordrecht. pp. 45--57.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5.  6
    Ethical rationalism and the law.Patrick Capps & Shaun D. Pattinson (eds.) - 2017 - Portland, Oregon: Hart Publishing.
    What role does reason play in determining what, if anything, is morally right? What role does morality play in law? Perhaps the most controversial answer to these fundamental questions is that reason supports a supreme principle of both morality and legality. The contributors to this book cast a fresh critical eye over the coherence of modern approaches to ethical rationalism within law, and reflect on the intellectual history on which it builds. The contributors then take the debate beyond the traditional (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6. Advance refusals and the personal identity objection.Shaun D. Pattinson - 2017 - In Patrick Capps & Shaun D. Pattinson (eds.), Ethical rationalism and the law. Portland, Oregon: Hart Publishing.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7.  17
    Revisiting Landmark Cases in Medical Law.Shaun D. Pattinson - 2018 - Routledge.
    Is it lawful for a doctor to give a patient life-shortening pain relief? Can treatment be lawfully provided to a child under 16 on the basis of her consent alone? Is it lawful to remove food and water provided by tube to a patient in a vegetative state? Is a woman's refusal of a caesarean section recommended for the benefit of the fetus legally decisive? These questions were central to the four focal cases revisited in this book. This book revisits (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8.  76
    (1 other version)Variations and voids: the regulation of human cloning around the world. [REVIEW]Shaun D. Pattinson & Timothy Caulfield - 2004 - BMC Medical Ethics 5 (1):1-8.
    Background No two countries have adopted identical regulatory measures on cloning. Understanding the complexity of these regulatory variations is essential. It highlights the challenges associated with the regulation of a controversial and rapidly evolving area of science and sheds light on a regulatory framework that can accommodate this reality. Methods Using the most reliable information available, we have performed a survey of the regulatory position of thirty countries around the world regarding the creation and use of cloned embryos (see Table (...)
    Direct download (12 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations