7 found
Order:
See also
Sara Van Goozen
University of York
  1.  42
    Harming Civilians and the Associative Duties of Soldiers.Sara Van Goozen - 2018 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 35 (3):584-600.
    According to International Humanitarian Law and many writing on just war theory, combatants who foresee that their actions will harm or kill innocent non-combatants are required to take some steps to reduce these merely foreseen harms. However, because often reducing merely foreseen harms place burdens on combatants – including risk to their lives – this requirement has been criticised for requiring too much of combatants. One reason why this might be the case is that combatants have duties to each other (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  2.  12
    Counting Animals in War.Josh Milburn & Sara Van Goozen - 2021 - Social Theory and Practice 47 (4):657-685.
    War is harmful to animals, but few have considered how such harm should affect assessments of the justice of military actions. In this article, we propose a way in which concern for animals can be included within the just-war framework, with a focus on necessity and proportionality. We argue that counting animals in war will not make just-war theory excessively demanding, but it will make just-war theory more humane. By showing how animals can be included in our proportionality and necessity (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3.  12
    Ethics, Security, and the War Machine: The True Cost of the Military N. Dobos, 2020 Oxford Oxford University Press Ix 184 Pp, £45. [REVIEW]Sara Van Goozen - 2021 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 38 (2):351-353.
  4.  17
    Sharing the Costs of Fighting Justly.Sara Van Goozen - 2018 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy (2):1-21.
    Combatants who attempt to obey the laws of war often have to take considerable risks in order to effectively discriminate between legitimate and illegitimate targets. Sometimes this task is made even more complicated by systemic factors which influence their ability to discriminate effectively without unduly risking their lives or the mission. If they fail to do so, civilians often pay the price. In this paper, I argue that to the extent that non-combatants benefit from the attempt to fight justly, and (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5.  6
    Sharing the Costs of Fighting Justly.Sara Van Goozen - 2020 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 23 (2):233-253.
    Combatants who attempt to obey the laws of war often have to take considerable risks in order to effectively discriminate between legitimate and illegitimate targets. Sometimes this task is made even more complicated by systemic factors which influence their ability to discriminate effectively without unduly risking their lives or the mission. If they fail to do so, civilians often pay the price. In this paper, I argue that to the extent that non-combatants benefit from the attempt to fight justly, and (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6.  1
    Distributing the Harm of Just Wars: In Defence of an Egalitarian Baseline.Sara Van Goozen - 2021 - Routledge.
    This book argues that the risk of harm in armed conflict should be divided equally between combatants and enemy non-combatants. International law requires that combatants in war take 'all feasible precautions' to minimise damage to civilian objects, injury to civilians, and incidental loss of civilian life. However, there is no clear explanation of what 'feasible precautions' means in this context, or what would count as sufficiently minimised incidental harm. As a result, it is difficult to judge whether a particular war (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7.  1
    Challenging Humanitarian Intervention? [REVIEW]Sara Van Goozen - 2019 - Global Justice : Theory Practice Rhetoric 11 (2):81-89.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark