5 found
Order:
  1.  6
    Why We Should Reject the Restrictive Isomorphic Matching Definition of Empathy.Brett A. Murphy, Scott O. Lilienfeld & Sara B. Algoe - 2022 - Emotion Review 14 (3):167-181.
    Emotion Review, Volume 14, Issue 3, Page 167-181, July 2022. A growing cadre of influential scholars has converged on a circumscribed definition of empathy as restricted only to feeling the same emotion that one perceives another is feeling. We argue that this restrictive isomorphic matching definition is deeply problematic because it deviates dramatically from traditional conceptualizations of empathy and unmoors the construct from generations of scientific research and clinical practice; insistence on an isomorphic form undercuts much of the functional value (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  2.  8
    Comment: Developing and Maintaining High-Quality Relationships Via Emotion.Sara B. Algoe - 2020 - Emotion Review 12 (4):276-278.
    This comment addresses opportunities for understanding the social functions of emotion by taking a developmental perspective. I agree that understanding emotions and their development will meaningf...
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  3. Gratitude Expressions Improve Teammates’ Cardiovascular Stress Responses.Yumeng Gu, Joseph M. Ocampo, Sara B. Algoe & Christopher Oveis - forthcoming - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4. Authors Reply: Empathy and Creativity: Dangers of the Methodological Tail Wagging the Conceptual Dog.Brett A. Murphy & Sara B. Algoe - 2022 - Emotion Review 14 (3):189-193.
    The three commentaries on “Why We Should Reject the Restrictive Isomorphic Matching Definition of Empathy” mostly concurred with our critique of that widely adopted definition of empathy. Yet, commenters also raised important questions relating to the clarity and operationalizability of our recommended alternative: returning to a classical conceptualization of empathy as a dynamic, functionally oriented, multi-faceted unfolding process. To help contextualize these issues, we provide an extended analogy between empathy research and creativity research, areas of study which are conceptually linked (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5.  1
    Empathy and Creativity: Dangers of the Methodological Tail Wagging the Conceptual Dog.Brett A. Murphy & Sara B. Algoe - forthcoming - Emotion Review.
    Emotion Review, Ahead of Print. The three commentaries on “Why We Should Reject the Restrictive Isomorphic Matching Definition of Empathy” mostly concurred with our critique of that widely adopted definition of empathy. Yet, commenters also raised important questions relating to the clarity and operationalizability of our recommended alternative: returning to a classical conceptualization of empathy as a dynamic, functionally oriented, multi-faceted unfolding process. To help contextualize these issues, we provide an extended analogy between empathy research and creativity research, areas of (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark