6 found
  1.  62
    Mentoring and Research Misconduct: An Analysis of Research Mentoring in Closed ORI Cases.David E. Wright, Sandra L. Titus & Jered B. Cornelison - 2008 - Science and Engineering Ethics 14 (3):323-336.
    We are reporting on how involved the mentor was in promoting responsible research in cases of research misconduct. We reviewed the USPHS misconduct files of the Office of Research Integrity. These files are created by Institutions who prosecute a case of possible research misconduct; ORI has oversight review of these investigations. We explored the role of the mentor in the cases of trainee research misconduct on three specific behaviors that we believe mentors should perform with their trainee: (1) review source (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   16 citations  
  2.  61
    Ensuring PhD Development of Responsible Conduct of Research Behaviors: Who’s Responsible?Sandra L. Titus & Janice M. Ballou - 2014 - Science and Engineering Ethics 20 (1):221-235.
    The importance of public confidence in scientific findings and trust in scientists cannot be overstated. Thus, it becomes critical for the scientific community to focus on enhancing the strategies used to educate future scientists on ethical research behaviors. What we are lacking is knowledge on how faculty members shape and develop ethical research standards with their students. We are presenting the results of a survey with 3,500 research faculty members. We believe this is the first report on how faculty work (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  3.  12
    Do You Understand?: An Ethical Assessment of Researchers’ Description of the Consenting Process.Sandra L. Titus & Moira A. Keane - 1996 - Journal of Clinical Ethics 7 (1):60-68.
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  4.  47
    Assessing the Preparedness of Research Integrity Officers (RIOs) to Appropriately Handle Possible Research Misconduct Cases.Arthur J. Bonito, Sandra L. Titus & David E. Wright - 2012 - Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (4):605-619.
    Institutions receiving federal funding for research from the U.S.Public Health Service need to have policies and procedures to both prevent research misconduct and to adjudicate it when it occurs. The person who is designated to handle research misconduct is typically referred to as the research integrity officer (RIO). In this interview study we report on 79 RIOs who describe how they would handle allegations of research misconduct. Their responses were compared to two expert RIOs. The responses to the allegations in (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  5.  14
    Together and apart in the family.Paul C. Rosenblatt & Sandra L. Titus - forthcoming - Humanitas.
    Direct download  
    Export citation  
  6.  25
    Faculty Members' Perceptions of Advising Versus Mentoring: Does the Name Matter? [REVIEW]Sandra L. Titus & Janice M. Ballou - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (3):1267-1281.
    The recommendations, during the past 20 years, to improve PhD scientific training and graduate school success, have focused on the significance of mentoring. It is well established that PhD students with mentors have significantly more success in graduate school as demonstrated by publishing papers before they graduate and by making presentations. Have faculty and academic institutions embraced the mentoring role? This study explores the views of 3,500 scientists who have primary responsibilities to educate PhD and MD/PhD students. Faculty members report (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   3 citations