5 found
Order:
  1.  19
    Neonatal Decision-Making: Beyond the Standard of Best Interests.Robert D. Truog & Sadath A. Sayeed - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (2):44 - 45.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  2.  9
    Assessing the Modified Youngest-First Principle and the Idea of Non-Persons at the Bedside: A Clinical Perspective.Sadath A. Sayeed - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (4):52 – 54.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  3.  15
    The Marginally Viable Newborn: Legal Challenges, Conceptual Inadequacies, and Reasonableness.Sadath A. Sayeed - 2006 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 34 (3):600-610.
    Decisions to provide life-sustaining medical care for marginally viable newborns present a unique set of morally complex challenges for providers and parents in the United States. This article examines recent legal trends that restrict discretionary decision-making, and critiques commonly employed ethical justifications offered to support permitting such discretion.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  4.  7
    The Marginally Viable Newborn: Legal Challenges, Conceptual Inadequacies, and Reasonableness.Sadath A. Sayeed - 2006 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 34 (3):600-610.
    In the past few years, medical practices surrounding the decision to resuscitate marginally viable newborns have received a fair amount of attention. Baroness Warnock, of the UK Nuffield Council on Bioethics, has recently suggested that Britain follow the recommended practice in Holland of setting a gestational age limit below which marginally viable newborns should not be routinely resuscitated, despite reported statistical probabilities of raw survival approaching twenty percent. In the US, a highly publicized case from Texas came to a controversial (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  5.  35
    Does Professional Orientation Predict Ethical Sensitivities? Attitudes of Paediatric and Obstetric Specialists Toward Fetuses, Pregnant Women and Pregnancy Termination.Stephen D. Brown, Karen Donelan, Yolanda Martins, Sadath A. Sayeed, Christine Mitchell, Terry L. Buchmiller, Kelly Burmeister & Jeffrey L. Ecker - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (2):117-122.
    Background To determine whether fetal care paediatric and maternal–fetal medicine specialists harbour differing attitudes about pregnancy termination for congenital fetal conditions, their perceived responsibilities to pregnant women and fetuses, and the fetus as a patient and whether self-perceived primary responsibilities to fetuses and women and views about the fetus as a patient are associated with attitudes about clinical care.Methods Mail survey of 434 MFM and FCP specialists .Results MFMs were more likely than FCPs to disagree with these statements : ‘the (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation