11 found
Order:
  1.  8
    On the Evidentiary Standards for Nutrition Advice.Saana Jukola - 2019 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 73:1-9.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  2.  15
    On Ideals of Objectivity, Judgments, and Bias in Medical Research – A Comment on Stegenga.Saana Jukola - 2017 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 62:35-41.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  3. New Directions in Philosophy of Medicine.Jacob Stegenga, Ashley Kennedy, Serife Tekin, Saana Jukola & Robyn Bluhm - forthcoming - In James Marcum (ed.), Bloomsbury Companion to Contemporary Philosophy of Medicine. Bloomsbury Academic. pp. 343-367.
    The purpose of this chapter is to describe what we see as several important new directions for philosophy of medicine. This recent work (i) takes existing discussions in important and promising new directions, (ii) identifies areas that have not received sufficient and deserved attention to date, and/or (iii) brings together philosophy of medicine with other areas of philosophy (including bioethics, philosophy of psychiatry, and social epistemology). To this end, the next part focuses on what we call the “epistemological turn” in (...)
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  4.  15
    On Evidence Fiascos and Judgments in COVID-19 Policy.Stefano Canali & Saana Jukola - 2021 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 43 (2):1-4.
    Calls for evidence-based approaches to COVID-19 have sparked up discussions on the use of evidence for policy. In this note, we expand these discussions: while the debate has mostly focused on the types of evidence to be used for policy, we argue that the assessment of judgments involved in data practices and evidence production should play a central role in evaluating policy.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  5. Longino’s Theory of Objectivity and Commercialized Research.Saana Jukola - 2015 - In Hanne Andersen, Nancy J. Nersessian & Susann Wagenknecht (eds.), Empirical Philosophy of Science. Springer Verlag.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  6.  34
    A Social Epistemological Inquiry Into Biases in Journal Peer Review.Saana Jukola - 2017 - Perspectives on Science 25 (1):124-148.
    Journal peer review is an essential part of academic practices.1 But how well does it serve its purpose and which factors have an influence on how close it comes to achieving its aims? Peer review has been widely discussed in empirical literature: it has been studied both qualitatively and quantitatively (e.g., by Cole, who in his 1992 book uses data on how grant applications submitted to National Science Foundation were...
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  7.  30
    Commercial Interests, Agenda Setting, and the Epistemic Trustworthiness of Nutrition Science.Saana Jukola - 2019 - Synthese 198 (Suppl 10):2629-2646.
    The trustworthiness of nutrition science has been questioned recently. According to the critics, the food industry has corrupted scientists in the field. I argue that the worries that commercialization threatens the epistemic trustworthiness of nutrition science are indeed well-founded. However, it is problematic that the discussion has revolved around how funding can threaten the integrity of researchers and the methodological quality of the studies. By extending Wilholt’s :233–253, 2013) account of epistemic trustworthiness, I argue that when assessing the epistemic trustworthiness (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  8.  21
    Casuistic Reasoning, Standards of Evidence, and Expertise on Elite Athletes’ Nutrition.Saana Jukola - 2019 - Philosophies 4 (2):19-0.
    This paper assesses the epistemic challenges of giving nutrition advice to elite athletes in light of recent philosophical discussion concerning evidence-based practice. Our trust in experts largely depends on the assumption that their advice is based on reliable evidence. In many fields, the evaluation of the reliability of evidence is made on the basis of standards that originate from evidence-based medicine. I show that at the Olympic or professional level, implementing nutritional plans in real-world competitions requires contextualization of knowledge in (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  9.  12
    Introduction to the Special Issue on Philosophy of Medicine.Saana Jukola & Anke Bueter - 2021 - European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 17 (2):(SI1)5-8.
    This article is an introduction to the special issue on philosophy of medicine. Philosophy of medicine is a field that has flourished in the last couple of decades and has become increasingly institutionalized. The introduction begins with a brief overview of some of the most central recent developments in the field. It then describes the six articles that comprise this issue.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10.  21
    On the Conditions for Objectivity : How to Avoid Bias in Socially Relevant Research.Saana Jukola - unknown
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  11.  19
    Medical Nihilism.Saana Jukola - 2020 - Philosophical Psychology 33 (3):474-477.
    Volume 33, Issue 3, April 2020, Page 474-477.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark