Shang. Liang Shuming, Xiong Shili, Ma Yifu de jiao yi ji shi -- Xia. Liang Shuming, Xiong Shili, Ma Yifu lun Song Ming ru xue.

本书系统论述了与人的优死有关的生理学、哲学、心理学、伦理学及社会学等问题,同时系统地探讨了死亡标准、临终关怀、安乐死及死亡教育等优死实践问题。.

本书内容包括王玖兴先生生前发表的哲学文章、王玖兴所译著作的导言部分以及王玖兴所作未曾发表的哲学文章,在附录里介绍了王玖兴先生的简历、访谈录和他的纪念文章。.

本书按文章的相关相近性质分为三卷:第一卷的主要内容是专著美感教育研究和有关美学美育,现实美,自然美诸问题的文章;第二卷既有论述马克思主义经典作家关于悲剧,艺术的不朽魅力和美的规律等方面的思想的文章,又 有探讨我国古代美学思想,特别是音乐美学思想的文章,还有评述马克思主义美学家蔡仪美学思想的一组文章;第三卷的主要部分是探讨体育与美育的关系以及体育运动美的特点,种类和欣赏等问题的论著,还有关于社会主义文 学与人道主义,与人情,与意识形态性等的关系的文章.

本文集收录了作者有关文艺,文化美学研究方面的论文,文艺评论等,共分四卷,第一卷为"文艺审美学研究",第二卷为"艺术文化审美学研究",第三卷为"文艺审美评论",第四卷为"审美回忆录".

作者是中央党校副校长。书中收入作者的文章27篇,内容分为关于马克思主义哲学理论,关于马克思主义中国化,关于重大现实问题等三个部分。从一个侧面反映了我国改革开放以来科研成果学社会主义理论研究的历程;反映 了中国特色社会主义理论与实践的发展。.

本书用浅易、生动的语言描述了王阳明的言论与事迹。其主要内容包括:“贵族”不是一天养成的、天才和他的土壤、一门心思学马援、圣人必可学而至等。.

王玉玺先生用隶、行两体书写“墨经”,内容包括:世界观;认识论;逻辑学;方法论;历史观;经济学等。.

本书共由八讲组成, 分别是圣人必可学而至、王阳明的心学体系、事功与兵学、文学思想与诗文创作、教育思想与实践、阳明后学、阳明学在近现代的影响, 阳明文化与贵州旅游. 每个论题论述集中, 深度适中, 叙述性语言通俗流畅, 故事性强, 很适合大众读者阅读. 为启发读者思考, 增强阅读效果, 在每一讲之后适量设置了一些名词解释、简答讨论题. 另配合相关文字, 设置了一些图片、碑刻和阳明书法作品等, 具有极佳的观赏性.

1. Xin yi shu chuang zuo lun, Xin yi shu lun ji -- 2. Mian xiang sheng huo, Lun yi shu de ji qiao -- 3. Yi yi dang shi -- 4. Xi wen le jian -- 5. Ge er bu ge -- 6. Lun Feng jie -- 7. Kai xin yue shi -- 8. Bu dao ding dian, Shen mei de min gan -- 9. Zai zai tan suo -- 10. Liao ran yu xin -- 11. Shen mei tan (...) -- 12. Si zeng xiang shi, Yi shen er ren -- 13. Shen mei xin tai -- 14. Hui jian zi ji -- 15. Diao su diao su -- 16. "Fu huo" de fu huo -- 17. Dong fang ji bai -- 18. Shen yu wu you -- 19. Tu na ying hua -- 20. Qu yu wu xie -- 21. Shu xin, ti ci xuan -- 22. Duan jian can pian. (shrink)

In (2011) McLeod suggested that the first century Chinese philosopher Wang Chong 王充 may have been a pluralist about truth. In this reply I contest McLeod's interpretation of Wang Chong, and suggest "quasi-pluralism" (albeit more as an alternative to pluralism than as an interpretation of Wang Chong), which combines primitivism about the concept of truth with pluralism about justification.

A fundamental way in which human thought has developed has been constantly to explain the earliest "classics" that are the source of that thought. All in all, the number of such classics is not very high, their explanations are past counting. Moreover, they are constantly increasing, giving rise to an explanatory chain deriving from the classics. In the development of Chinese philosophy, this aspect is particularly noticeable, so that one can describe Chinese philosophy as a continual explanation of the classics. (...) This holds for both Confucianism and Daoism. The main classics of Daoism are the Laozi and the Zhuangzi. These two works have been constantly reread and reinterpreted throughout history. From the late nineteenth century onward, Chinese philosophy came into closer contact with Western philosophy. Foreign concepts were brought in to provide philosophers with new "insight." Some thinkers applied this new insight or these foreign concepts to the Daoist classics. In this way, they brought a new explanation of the Daoist classics and enriched the ways of interpreting the texts.1 Paving the way in this direction were Yan Fu. Zhang Taiyan, Liang Qichao, Wang Guowei, and Hu Shi. (shrink)

Within various contexts, such as politics and parenting, Confucianism has been criticized on the basis that it endorses ‘unquestioning obedience’ to authorities. In recent years, several philosophers have argued against this view by appealing to textual evidence from Classical Confucian philosophers. In this essay, I examine Wang Yangming’s views on this subject, arguing that Wang teaches that criticism of those who stand in a socially superior role relation is not only permitted, but encouraged. From this, I consider the (...) implications that Wang’s analysis has for contemporary discussions of disagreement between epistemic superiors and inferiors and epistemic peerhood. I will argue that Wang’s position is much closer to the total evidence view than the preemptive view. Relatedly, I will suggest that Wang provides a novel proposal about how to recognise or disregard epistemic ‘superiors’, especially in the context of moral knowledge. (shrink)

In this paper we analyses the work of the first century Chinese philosopher Wang Chong as in part grappling with epistemology of testimony. Often portrayed as a curmudgeonly skeptic, Wang Chong actually best seen as a demanding piecemeal non-reductionist, which is to say he believed that testimony was a basic source of evidence unless subject to a defeater (non-reductionism), but also that we should evaluate testimony on a claim-by-claim basis (piecemeal) rather than accepting a whole source on the (...) strength of its reputation or authority, and finally he thought one has a strong duty to search for defeaters (demanding). We defend each of these claims as well as the fruitfulness of applying such anachronistic terminology to an ancient thinker. We end with a discussion of how Wang Chong's epistemology relates to his rhetorical method and then consider some problems he faces because of his epistemic commitments. (shrink)